Author Archives: Peter Diamandis

Peter Diamandis: Steve Forbes’ Advice on Innovation and Corporate Mindset

This is the first part of my two-part blog about my conversation with Steve Forbes, chairman and CEO of Forbes Media, speaking about free markets, bold innovations and how he embraces change.

Steve Forbes is a friend who helped me launch my book, Abundance, holding my first-ever launch party at the Forbes headquarters in New York. He’s a man whose mindset and brand shouts abundance.

One of my objectives in this BOLD blog is to interview some of today’s most successful CEOs and billionaires, and to share with you how they think and how they make critical decisions. This is one of those interviews with the man who knows more successful CEOs and billionaires than almost anyone else, and he shared with me some of what he learned in his encounters with them. The “Forbes List of Billionaires” is most definitely the who’s-who of today’s most successful entrepreneurs.

During our conversation, I asked Steve to share his thoughts on entrepreneurship, the future of large corporations and his own experience with transforming Forbes.

1. Steve on the “explosion of an entrepreneurial class around the world”: “I think characteristics among entrepreneurs around the world are pretty much the same. You have the vision, you have the drive and the desire and obliviousness to the clock, you work till you get it done. That doesn’t change. What has changed is that, thanks to the fall of the Berlin Wall, thanks to the success of the U.S. coming out of the malaise in the 1980s, suddenly, what you might call the entrepreneurial class has exploded around the world — India, China, central and eastern Europe, the Baltic States.”

“I mean, who ever thought Skype would be developed in Estonia? So, it’s not so much the characteristics of entrepreneurship as much as the opportunity to practice entrepreneurship that has grown exponentially,” Steve added.

2. Steve on the “bloated large-size corporations”: “It is human nature that organizations inevitably become inward-looking,” Steve said. “You lose sight of the reason the organization was created, and you become all about the organization. British historian C. Northcote Parkinson did a history of the British navy, and wrote about this phenomenon. After World War I, when Britain won the war, it didn’t need a big navy anymore, so it sharply downsized the number of ships, sailors, dockworkers and the like during the 1920s. Even though the Navy was drastically shrinking in the ’20s, the bureaucracy called the Admiralty, which ran the Navy, actually was getting bigger. Parkinson observed that the amount of work or size of an organization has nothing to do with the work really at hand.”

“Every organization eventually becomes inward looking, bloated and loses sight and becomes pretty much useless,” Steve explained. “The virtue of free markets is if you do that, you get tossed aside. One of the dangers in free markets is if you focus on trying to do what you’re doing better, sometimes that may be obsolete. IBM got into personal computers but still had the mainframe mindset, so even though it started to make drastic changes in the 80s, by the early 90s it nearly went down for the count. You saw it in the steel industry, too. The idea of making steel out of scrap was something that traditional steel mills said no to. So they all fell by the wayside or drastically shrank, while new companies like Nucor came in and for a while did very well,” he said.

“This gets us to our business today: media. We have the mindset of 150 years ago,” Steve said. “You create content, you hope to attract an audience with that content, and then you deliver that audience to an advertiser. That’s the mindset you see today — one based mostly on advertising revenue.”

“We have to find new sources of revenue,” he explained. “The web is knocking out what we call middlemen. What this means for journalists is that you don’t make your living as a pure journalist anymore. You have to have a portfolio of jobs as a consultant doing a variety of things. But trying to get traditional media people to wrap their minds around this change is very, very tough.”

“So, when you focus on being the best at what you have traditionally done, you might lose sight of the fact that what you still doing may not be in demand in the marketplace anymore,” he said. “That’s what is so humbling. You’re trying to do your best and the market may just pass you by. What you’re doing just isn’t needed anymore.”

3. Steve on “transforming Forbes.com”: “You may do something right but it doesn’t mean it’s always going to be the right thing to do,” Steve said, speaking about his business. “In the mid-’90s, like everyone else we went into the electronic world. We started Forbes.com. Most publishers made the mistake of thinking that if you took the printed page and threw it on the screen, voila! You’re in a brand-new world, sort of the equivalent of when Edison and others invented movies over 120 years ago. Initially,” he explained, “it was thought that feature films would be like filming a stage play. But no: It’s an entirely different medium, film.”

“So, we did that,” said Steve. “We went through the horrors of the early part of the last decade when everyone was telling us we’re pouring tens of millions of dollars in information on the website, we’re idiots. The bubble burst all of that kind of thing, and then it all came together. And from 2002 to about 2006 or 2007, by golly, our website was booming.”

“What we didn’t notice was that even though we caught the first wave right, the Web was relentlessly commoditizing marketing. So the market no longer took for granted that because you had a great audience and a great brand name you should be paid a premium for reaching that audience. Ultimately we ended up having to do a mad scramble and make drastic changes,” he said.

“I think we did it well,” said Steve. “Today we get over 30 million unique visitors a month to our website and it’s been doubling over the last year or so. That doesn’t mean we’re going to be doing that tomorrow. Again, the Web is drastically changing things, and even if you get one part of it right, our traditional competition is no longer the same, it’s a whole new world. So, while we got the first wave of change right, we didn’t see the other wave as quickly. No one did, but we should have and didn’t.”

In my next blog, Steve Forbes will share his top 10 recommendations for success. Great stuff.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Peter Diamandis: Visioneering the Future

This week at XPRIZE’s Visioneering 2013, 120 of the world’s visionary thinkers will gather for three days to discuss the world’s grand challenges, and how we might solve them using incentive competitions. The event itself is extremely inspiring and a lot of fun, attracting an incredible ‘who’s who’ from the philanthropic, corporate and entrepreneurial world. Past attendees range from Larry Page and Sir Richard Branson to James Cameron, Quincy Jones, and Paul Allen.

2013-04-23-Visioneering.jpg

Visioneering is a standard format. We typically pick five to ten “themed grand challenge areas,” and our group of attending philanthropists, CEOs and government leaders focus on discussing the associated problems and market failures and then design Prizes to try and address them. Over the three-day Visioneering weekend the participants will develop dozens of Prize concepts, and then in a competitive head-to-head showdown that resembles a cross between TED and American Idol, the prize concepts are winnowed down to five finalists. In 2012, these are the five ideas that made it to the finals:

Empowering the Unpowered (affordable, on-demand rural energy)
Sydney By Lunch (high-speed, low-carbon travel from New York to Sydney in less than two hours)
Brain Dashboard (non-invasive, affordable brain health monitor)
Ed-U-Phone (achieving literacy on a mass scale, sustainably, by tapping into the universal desire for mobile technology)
Motion of the Ocean (portable, affordable desalination device powered by wave and tidal energy)

Eric Hirshberg, CEO of Activision, and his team received the top honors for “Ed-U-Phone.” That prize idea ultimately led to the creation of the Global Literacy XPRIZE, which is currently in development, and which we hope will revolutionize global literacy and change what people think is possible regarding the means and methods used to learn.

A number of today’s funded and launched XPRIZEs were born from past Visioneering sessions. Two concepts, AI Physician and Lab-on-a-Chip, conceived during a session in 2010, led to the funding and launch of the $10 million Qualcomm Tricorder XPRIZE.

For Visioneering 2013 we have chosen eight topics that go beyond the XPRIZE’s established interests in space, oceans and health. The critically-important new subjects we will tackle are:

Aging: How do we prepare for an expanding older population?
Behavior: How can we incentivize people to stop doing things that are bad for them or for society?
Happiness: How can we live happier, safer lives?
Infrastructure: How can we rebuild strong, innovative, resilient public and private infrastructure, physical and virtual?
Learning: How can we educate and train students of all ages to prepare them for 21st century jobs?
Mobility: How will we move ourselves and our information in the future?
Security: How can we protect our communities, our businesses, and our nations?
Women: How do we engage the power of women and girls in communities around the world?

What idea will win this year? Be sure to follow the action on Twitter at #Visioneering starting around April 25 on through the weekend, and visit xprize.org/visioneering to learn the results of the competition. Together with a clear vision of the future, we can solve the world’s grand challenges and create a world of abundance.

Visit XPRIZE at xprize.org, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Google+, and get our Newsletter to stay informed.

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Peter Diamandis: The 5 Ways Local Motors Built an Online Community

In this blog, I’m continuing my conversation with Jay Rogers, CEO and co-founder of Local Motors, the open-source automotive design company. Here, Jay shares how he builds and engages his 30,000-person crowd.

As I’ve conducted my interviews with crowdsourcing entrepreneurs and experts, it’s constantly hit me that your ability to do something big and bold is really a function of the size and quality of your crowd. The questions I’m always fascinated to ask successful crowd-related CEOs are: “How did you do it? How did you recruit, build and engage your crowd?”

In this blog I’ll share five specific ways that Local Motors CEO Jay Rogers found to build and engage his crowd of innovative automotive designers.

To recap, Local Motors is a crowdsourced car-design platform that also allows the micro-manufacturing of cars by its members. Local Motors built a community of people who are versed in every critical aspect of engineering: the interior design, the exterior design, the suspension system, and so on. Here are the five ways in which Jay Rogers and his team built their online community.

Create a bold dream that allows for creativity, with a measure of supervision: “Management of open source is definitely a guided endeavor,” Jay said. In its early days, Local Motors very closely managed its forum of roughly 1,000 people who were contributing designs.
“Basically, whatever was being discussed on our forums was being communicated to the entire membership,” Jay said. “However, for it to work, we had to run it as a benevolent tyranny, or benign dictatorship. The reason I say that is that we ultimately had to make a decision about which car we were going to design and produce,” he said. Ultimately Jay couldn’t allow the discussion to go on forever or diverge in a multitude of directions. As the benign dictator he had to step in and “make the decision that we would take the most-liked designs from the community and produce that car.”
Embrace failure. Use it to improve your process: According to Jay, “Failure is as important, or perhaps even more important, than success. Small-scale manufacturing means fail early, fail often. Crowdsourcing means fail early, fail often,” he continued. “The important thing is to get something created, see where it breaks, and then fix it. I tell people to build it for manufacture, see if people like it and then if they don’t, we can change it.”
“We’ve even had failure in how we created our competitions,” Jay reflected. “At first Local Motors thought it would attract its teams by approaching design schools. It failed miserably. We had a lot of legal wrangling over design ownership and licensing. So we backed off from that, and found another way.”
Use evangelism to create interest in the site. Evangelism is creating enthusiasm among your crowd so that they are eager not only to work with you, but also to tell others about what you do to help build your community. To help create early interest in its platform, Local Motors staff visited sites frequented by designers. “We’d simply say, ‘We’re going to make a car that you guys design. What do you think?’ The important thing is to plant the flag,” Jay said, “and tell people what you’re going to do. Give a vision and say, ‘You’re going to make a vehicle on Local Motors and it’s going to be awesome, you’re going to love it and we’re going to be honored to make it.’ That was the first community evangelism that we did.”
Move people through passion: Passion gets an entrepreneur through the startup days and the enormous efforts it takes to build a business. “If you start with passion, all of the hard days are easier to deal with,” Jay said. “You don’t know if your idea is going to work, but you just have to stay true to what you wanted to do at the beginning. Getting through the hard times is what you need the passion for and organizing your community is what you need passion for. You have to foster and develop the community and you need passion in order to be able to do that,” he said.
Leadership, Organization, Respect and Engagement — the 4 Key Parameters: Jay told me, “When I’m building a community, I focus on four key organizing principles: Leadership, Organization, Respect and Engagement or LORE.” He outlined them:

Leadership. This is a bold vision for the community. “Creating a vision is a form of leadership,” Jay said. “To lead means to have a vision,” which can encompass everything from what your cars should look like to the way the factories are going to be run.
Organizing. This means creating a very defined, constrained box within which the community can operate and design. “Most people create better in a box,” Jay said. “We had to set the box for the right conditions for successful micro-manufacturing.” The Local Motors team learned the importance of creating parameters for engineers and designers. Early on, Jay remembered, “We learned two things: First, every engineer we interviewed said, ‘Tell me the parameters of what I’m designing.’ Second, everybody in a design school never asked those questions, but said, ‘I’ve some great ideas.’ They were more free-flowing with their great ideas and willing to share them under the right conditions.”
Respect. Respect is about managing that community and keeping people’s name on their ideas and on what they create. “You’re respecting their work,” Jay said. “Your ability to be able to post your work and keep it as your own is critical to the fostering of such a community. Respect is also managing that community actively through the process.”
Engagement. This is about speaking honestly and openly to the community. “We don’t pay money to make people come to do what we do,” Jay recounted. “Yes, we need money, such as competition prizes, in order to be able to make them do things. But the most important thing is to actually talk with them. That’s what engagement means: Instead of paying you, I’m going to pay you with my time and I’m going to pay you with my building of what you design.”

In my next blog, I’m going to continue my conversation with Jay Rogers, and how he manages the competition and design initiatives at Local Motors, plus what’s ahead for the site.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Peter Diamandis: Can You Even Crowdsource the Design of a Car?

In this blog, I’m introducing you to Jay Rogers, CEO and co-founder of Local Motors, an open-source automotive design company that uses the power of the crowd to innovate a 100-year-old industry.

My personal fascination with the power of the crowd has been growing: Exactly what can a “crowd” accomplish? We know crowds can raise billions of dollars, create Wikipedia, and even design and build small autonomous drones. But how about something large and complex like designing a new car, and maybe someday even a spaceship?

You can imagine my enthusiasm when I met and interviewed Local Motors CEO Jay Rogers at Singularity University, where he filled me in on the remarkable ability of the crowd to reinvent the design and manufacture of cars.

Local Motors currently engages a crowd of more than 30,000 members who are passionate, knowledgeable and capable of automotive design. This could not have existed before the exponential tools and technologies that allow virtual communities to come together to share, manipulate and visualize large data files. Local Motors takes something traditional — old-fashioned craftsmanship — and brings it into the new millennium.

In Local Motors, Jay Rogers has drawn on the creative power of a global community of car lovers, designers and innovators to revolutionize automotive design (and product design in general). The company co-creates autos, as well as automotive parts and other products such as sneakers. It is best known for its Rally Fighter off-road race vehicle, which also happens to be street legal.

Jay has a fascinating and rich background. He served for six years in the United States Marine Corps, where he was an Infantry Company Commander. Next he worked as a consultant for McKinsey & Co., then at a startup medical device company in the People’s Republic of China. He is a graduate of Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and holds an MBA from Harvard Business School.

To begin our interview, I asked Jay about the origin of Local Motors. “I always thought I would be building cars,” he said. “But unfortunately I found that there was no place in the traditional university system for building cars and my dream, early on, never materialized. Then, while I was at Harvard for business school I met two professors who opened my eyes to what was possible: Karim Lakhani and Eric Von Hippel.” Lakhami taught Jay about open-source innovation and Von Hippel taught him about the democratization of innovation. Von Hippel taught Jay that end-users, rather than manufacturers, drive innovation. Jay became fascinated with the notion of taking consumer-derived ideas and putting those things forward as future products.

The next pivotal moment in Jay’s road to Local Motors was the day that he was introduced to the Threadless co-founders. “When I met Jake Nickell and Jacob DeHart, their model of creating an online community to design and market T-shirts completely inspired me,” he said. “These guys set out with the goal of figuring out a better way to make people want to buy an individual shirt. They figured out that if the shirt is attractive enough, it’s not about how little it costs, it’s more about how unique it is, and can I own a part of that scarcity.”

Effectively, Threadless is a site for crowdsourcing the design, marketing, production and purchase of T-shirts. “Modeled much on Threadless, Local Motors is a marriage of two concepts. It’s about the personalized, crowd-powered design of automotive ideas, as well as the local, small-scale manufacturing of those unique concepts,” Jay continued.

When I asked Jay what made Local Motors succeed, he provide three key touchstones that have driven him:

1. Don’t be hampered by antiquated production models: “It’s incredible,” began Jay, “how hampered the traditional auto manufacturers are by antiquated approaches. Many of America’s most advanced plants still using approaches that would be familiar to Henry Ford. For example, I went on tour of a Dearborn truck plant, part of a new Ford complex. It was completely empty. I asked, ‘What’s going on?’ It turned out to be the year-end changeover,” which can last between a day and a month — during which time the union workers cannot do anything. By contrast, the electronics and the software in cars can be changed in a day.” Jay lamented how certain union regulations and physical production cycles can cause such inefficiencies.
2. Learn how to be profitable even for small-production runs of unique “kit cars”: “One of the keys to Local Motors’ success was figuring out how make things at a low tooling cost, and making money even for low production runs. I was first inspired by this approach when I visited Factory Five Racing, an automobile company that designs and manufactures assembly kits for cars,” remembered Jay. “Factory Five had sold 2,000 cars a year and was profitable even with small-batch, homemade cars.”
3. Help people live their dream: More than 80 percent of the people who study automotive design do not work in the field. “The administrator of a famous design school astonished me with the stats,” said Jay. “The dirty secret is that only 17 percent of the design students who dream about designing cars will get a job in the automotive industry. My favorite story involves a graduate from one of the better design schools in France who was unable to find work with a car company and ended up playing Santa Claus at a mall in France, and then got a job at a slaughterhouse. This man kept in touch with automotive design through the Local Motors site, and eventually, a Local Motors community evangelist got in touch with him and offered him the opportunity to design a car. We help people live their dreams.”

Local Motors, through its online global network, represents the chance of fulfilled dreams for designers who would otherwise not have this opportunity. “My message has always been that if you think you can build a complex cyber-mechanical system, you can probably do it better with a large group of people who you plant a flag, give them a vision, organize them, respect them and engage them and then together you’ll chase your dreams. That’s what we do.”

In my next blog, I’m going to look at how Jay was able to build this remarkable community at Local Motors, the crowd’s involvement in design, and the use of competitions to drive innovation and foster fellowship.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: TopCoder’s 5 Steps to Building a Global Workforce Community

In this blog, I’m continuing my conversation with TopCoder founder Jack Hughes, who gives us the steps that TopCoder took to build its community.

In my previous two posts about the open-innovation platform TopCoder, I introduced you to its methods. Now I want to explore how TopCoder engages with its vast network across the globe.

“It’s phenomenal what you get out of the community: how smart they are, how dedicated they are, how interested they are in either a client success or TopCoder success or each other’s success,” founder Jack Hughes told me. “They will be competing one minute and sharing notes about who won, then what’s the next step. It’s and incredible environment.”

To recap briefly, TopCoder is the world’s largest platform for digital open innovation, whose 445,000-plus members around the world compete to develop lines of code in return for prizes and recognition, resulting in great efficiencies of time and cost.

“Competition just happens to be the thing that first engaged our community,” Jack said. “There are many other aspects to TopCoder in terms of collaboration, in terms of how we go about business models, in terms of what our future is and what we think is many social aspects to TopCoder. TopCoder is a big deal with our community not because of the money in it or even because of the sponsors that are out there, or the fact that they can find a job out of it. But because they want to get together, because of the physical place where they can get together,” he said.

“The primary reason people hire us is not so much the money-saving, although it’s important,” Jack said. “What they’re trying to do is shorten that cycle to get innovative processes done.”

For TopCoder’s community, the project is the attractive thing: solving something people can be proud of before their peers. “TopCoder takes a big thing, breaks into many pieces and then aligns all of the aspects that have to be designed – construction, analytics, quality assurance, review. That all happens through the community,” Jack said.

“Some folks are really good at finding bugs and they’ll come in and they’ll just do that. Some folks are really good at fixing bugs; they’ll come in and just do that. Some people are really good at software design and will do that. Some people want to learn how to do software design, so they’ll come in. They might have been fixing bugs yesterday and today they want to learn software design, so they’ll come in and start competing in that. Not so much for the money – they don’t think they can win at first – but what they’re going to get is tremendous amount of feedback about how well they do it,” he said.

“Most of TopCoder’s productive capability is not from people doing it full-time,” Jack said, although a small segment works that way. “There is always a large segment that does it part-time. They’re entrepreneurs in their own way. They’re creating things for other people. They have a huge affinity for helping a startup or helping small business that are trying to figure out a way to connect better with customers and bring some ability to it. And now, they can do it at a price point that’s reachable.”

Jack outlined five steps that TopCoder used to build and engage its community:

Actively design and build the community, and start small. “The advice I would give,” Jack said, “is that anyone who thinks that community is just going to find them and come to them is just wrong. You have to find and engage them.”
2. Go out to universities and spread the word. “In the beginning we were literally stuffing posters into round tubes, mailing them to schools and saying that we were running competitions,” Jack said. “Those went to MIT, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon, all the usual. We then followed that up with actual visits to schools, where we would go into the school and hold the competition. The prizes would be beer and pizza. Doing that brought together cores of people who said, ‘This is really cool and I want to keep doing it.’ Then it went very viral, very quickly. We found that the university system was where people were most likely to talk about new things, new ideas, try new things, new ideas and it certainly worked in our case.”
3. Work with a partner to broaden your reach. Sun Microsystems sponsored TopCoder at one point and helped promote it. “Sun was looking at how we were attracting the community, and these were very highly skilled developers, the sort of everybody was looking for,” Jack said. “Sun showed a way to get its product line into these folks’ heads very early in their careers, whether they were going to go into a bank and do the analytics work or they were going to go and work for NASA and do engineering, whatever. Sun wanted to have that exposure to that group of people, even though it was relatively smaller at that time. I give Sun a lot of credit for doing that, for sort of going after that community as we had started the format.”
4. Encourage sharing, references and further participation. TopCoder created a member referral program, especially in large tournaments. “We would deviate the prize money so that if you referred a member who won, then you would get some sort of a tip for referring that member,” Jack said. “For a time we had incentives, and TopCoder is all about incentive systems and motivation systems. But the referral system was one of the ones to make it even more viral then already it was.”
5. Be authentic to your vision, and always involve the community. “Communities are good in everything,” Jack said. “They’re good at solving a particular problem. They’re also really good at sniffing out authenticity. So if you’re unauthentic, you figure that out fast. Authenticity was one of the first things that we put up when we started the community. We set out saying that we intend to make money. We found just by saying that rather than being sly about it made a huge difference,” Jack said.

“We’re moving much more to a knowledge-based economy globally. We’re moving to where the value content of the product or service is in its innovation capabilities, in its ability to help make its customer more competitive, faster, more efficient,” Jack said. “That takes knowledge and knowledge is never going to be owned by anybody. You build knowledge not by direct financial capital as you did in appointment. It’s by education, it’s by teaching, it’s by learning, it’s by constantly moving yourself forward. Because of the Internet, people have access to those resources much more quickly. It starts to shift the weight back to individuals.”

In my next blog, I’m going to continue exploring how Local Motors has revolutionized automotive design, through relying on the inspiration of the crowd.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: Crowd Control: TopCoder’s 3 Steps to Building Community

In this blog, I’m talking with entrepreneur Jack Hughes, founder of the open-innovation platform TopCoder, which brings together specialists from around the world to work on projects that end up costing far less than if these projects were done in-house.

TopCoder is a remarkable platform that connects corporations, organizations and government agencies with a worldwide talent pool to create digital products. It hosts online contests to design, and even to build, these solutions. I and my colleagues at X PRIZE Foundation have used TopCoder, and have found, like everyone else, that TopCoder’s global community of more than 450,000 technology and design specialists can find solutions to a wide range of problems at a fraction of the cost and time.

TopCoder is basically the world’s biggest talent pool. It breaks projects down into atomized pieces of work, each of which is turned into a competition. Specialists within the TopCoder community deliver solutions for each piece. In effect, people who individually excel in everything from concepts to data analysis, design work on aspects of a bigger project. It’s a great crowdsourcing model.

I spoke with founder Jack Hughes, who filled me in on TopCoder’s humble beginnings at a picnic table, and the way the company approaches its innovative contest-driven, gamified, crowdsourcing solutions.

The impetus behind TopCoder was, as often is the case with drivers of innovation, Jack and his colleagues’ inability to hire qualified people. “A great developer, a great creative person is a difficult thing to find,” he said. “So we were sort of just iterating through different ideas on how to make the reach better in terms of identifying folks, and one of the concepts we came up with was if we start, we were doing a lot of ad hoc contests internally, because great developers love to compete.”

This was back in 2000. Having sold their software development company, Jack and his partners, who included his brother Rob Hughes, “started to think about what to do next,” he explained. “We started to think about building a community of developers online. That was the inception.”

The early contests the team created offered a little bit of money, “just to make it interesting,” Jack said, “but mostly they were for pride. Developers are very closely related to other intellectual disciplines, such as chess. So we fashioned a rating system around developers and to measure skill in a particular discipline. That drove a lot of the interest — being able to get rated.” This branded rating actually drove the community to TopCoder.

At first, these were predominantly problems created for non-commercial purposes. “We want whoever can optimize and schedule an algorithm, network an algorithm to pick up notes and pick up the fastest path, in a particular network of notes, edges, so things that would be applied to graphics would be applied to anything that’s a complex math problem.

“It was basically a massive multiplayer game of coding. So they would all see the problem statement at the same time, they could open it, when they opened it a clock would start to ticking down, so they would get points associated with how quickly they submit it and then how accurate their code was.”

The initial community was a few hundred developers. Then Sun Microsystems came on as a sponsor in 2002-2003, and TopCoder got a big spike in membership from that and began to branch out into commercial work.

Here are three things TopCoder did to build its community:

1. Make it clear up front what the aim of the company is. Stay true to your authentic vision. “Whatever you’re doing it for and why you want a particular group or sets of groups of people around you, stay true to that and it will work out for you,” Jack said. “I wouldn’t say we had a formalized mission statement at the beginning of TopCoder, but we did have a founder’s letter that every member saw. To this day I think we adhere to it and we’ve since expanded the definition of it,” he said. “We felt that developers, people who create, are the center of everything. So how we connect those folks, how we facilitate their creativity, is what the business is always about,” Jack said.

“There are plenty of mistakes we made. But a mistake we haven’t made yet is to ignore the community. If you look at our early communications with community, they look very similar to today. Some of them literally say, ‘Without our community we don’t exist.’ [I deleted this last bit because it didn't feel essential to his message, and we restate it at the end]

“It is very difficult to live by that,” Jack explained. “It’s very easy to start thinking that there are other ways you can get things done, that there are mechanisms by which you sort of use the community. We would say that this isn’t about using the community. It’s about being part of one. If we lose that focus, I would say that’s when we lose it,” he said.

“I think communities may be harder to do now. We predated Facebook; we predated a lot of social networking, a lot of community-based business models. There’s money in it now. You’re going to have people chasing the money. I don’t think there is anything wrong with people making money. But at TopCoder we hold true to that and everything else will get sorted out. I think that’s little bit harder to do nowadays because building the community is going to be ramping it up to whatever size, doing whatever. The advice I would give is don’t do that.”

2. Competition drives commitment to the community — it’s competitive as well as collaborative. “Competition just happens to be the thing that first engaged our community,” Jack said. “There are many other aspects to TopCoder in terms of collaboration, in terms of how we go about business models, in terms of what our future is and what we think is many social aspects to TopCoder,” he added. “TopCoder opens the big deal with our community, not because of the money they win in it, or even because of the sponsors that are out there or the fact that they can find a job out of it. No, it’s because they want to get together, because of the physical place where they can get together.”

3. Validation points are important. Sun Microsystems came in as a sponsor that helped take TopCoder to the next level. “Sponsorship in our case was a validation point.” Jack said. “Making sure that you’re engaging the community and listening to the community and letting them help you form your business model is important. When we went to commercialize TopCoder, we didn’t do it for a number of years after we had started it. We started to think about very different models in different ways to do that. We could have done a matching service, we could have done a matching developer to a customer; we didn’t do that. We decided to use the competitive/collaborative regime to engage members in actually building the product,” he said.

“We felt that was the right thing for this particular community. At that point the community was probably 25,000 people. So there were a lot of people to be able to talk to. What we have found, and what we live by is this: We look at TopCoder as an inverted pyramid. The company exists to support the community. The community exists to support our customers and to support each other.”

In my next blog, I’m going to continue exploring the remarkable processes of TopCoder, how it works with its customers, how its process evolved and how it’s able to achieve such exponential economies of time and scale for its clients.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: Silicon Valley’s Secrets Disclosed

In this blog, I’m continuing my talk with entrepreneur Philip Rosedale, who explains the “secret sauce” of Silicon Valley — unveiling why Silicon Valley is such a hotbed of entrepreneurship.

I was interviewing Philip Rosedale, creator of the platforms Second Life and Coffee and Power, at Singularity University when he asked such a powerful and provocative question, that it launched me into a brand-new conversation with him. It is so important that I’m dedicating this entire blog to his answers.

His question: “Why does Silicon Valley have more successful software startups than anywhere else in the world? Are people just smarter here?”

After a short pause, Rosedale continued: “I don’t really believe that entrepreneurs are smarter in Silicon Valley, that we were genetically different or anything. San Francisco’s a tremendous melting pot of people from different areas. But I have been struck by the observation that in other countries the rate of success is much lower and that there’s a very low degree of sharing of ideas.”

“In Silicon Valley, you might think that people’s willingness and desire to exchange little pieces of information about what they’re doing carries more risk than benefit,” Rosedale said. “But if you added up their interactions overall, you’d see that there is a huge benefit to exchanging ideas. Ultimately it fuels more innovation and productivity here in Silicon Valley, in San Francisco, than anywhere else in the world,” he said.

In other parts of the world, Rosedale believes, “this lack of sharing might be driven simply by the fact that there aren’t enough people of the same ilk. There aren’t enough technical people running into each other in coffee shops colliding, if you will,” he said. “But culturally, just about everywhere other than in Northern California, people are very unwilling to share information with each other.”

“I’ve thought about that a lot,” Rosedale said. “As Second Life became famous, I got to travel around the world. Being an entrepreneur and an engineering person I was really interested in that fundamental question, which always struck me as a kind of funny cocktail-party conversation, since I don’t mind not pissing people off. When I was bored at cocktail parties, if I was in Europe, I’d bring out the question, ‘Why is it that you Europeans basically make no software and you’re all smarter than us?’ In Europe people are incredibly smart. They’re super effective. They can do all kinds of cool stuff. Why is that happening? And same thing in Asia,” he said.

“And then, moreover, in the United States, it’s not the whole United States that makes software — it’s just right here in Silicon Valley,” Rosedale said. “There’s really a lot more software that’s made here than anywhere else in the world. Why is that?”

Rosedale went on. “I had to give a talk at a great conference, called Big Omaha, which is a big get-together of entrepreneurs and mostly software tech people in Omaha, Nebraska. It gathers together people from that part of the country — Omaha, Des Moines — and I did this graph where I took Google Maps and I drew these circles, which were the area where 100,000 people lived superimposed on a map of each of these areas,” Rosedale said.

“I did Des Moines and I did Omaha and I did New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and other places. On the map was a random scatter chart of red dots, and each red dot was a technical co-founder,” he said. “We got that data from LinkedIn. Now, LinkedIn has searches where you can basically ask how many people in an area say something on their résumé like ‘technical founder,’ ‘co-founder.’ So you can count how many technical founders are in that area per 100,000 residents. And guess what? In Omaha and in most cities in the United States, that number is somewhere between 20 and 30 per 100,000 people,” he said.

“In New York the number is 51, but in San Francisco the number is about 340. It’s the classic thing we all look forward together here: It’s an order of magnitude higher. And the scatter chart looks like a shotgun shell loaded onto a map of San Francisco,” Rosedale said. “The point I was trying to make with the map was that if you’re going to work on a software project, it’s going to fail. The probability of startups succeeding is 10 percent, unless pigs fly and some statistics are radically changed,” he said.

“Your project is going to fail with a 90 percent change of probability,” Rosedale said. “It’s going to fail in about one year. So now the question is: what happens next? The graph pretty well illustrates it visually. As I said, out there in Omaha you’re not going to live through the winter. You’re 24 years old. You saved up a little bit of money. You’re not going to make it. You’re going to have to go back and live at home or something, which is pretty depressing. In San Francisco, you’re going to get another job in two weeks because it’s an order of magnitude difference,” Rosedale said. “You’re going to walk into a bar in the Mission in San Francisco and you’re going to run into the person who’s either going to hire you, co-found something with you next, or fund you.”

Because of this density of founders in Silicon Valley, people feel safe to try all sorts of projects, because if they fail they can move on to the next project. In fact, in Silicon Valley, people value failure as having trained them in that experience. “We’re culturally tolerant of it,” Rosedale said. “We have an amazing tolerance of it. It’s not so much that the Bay Area breeds or attracts people who are uniquely insane, who are willing to take on this level of risk. It’s actually that, for the most part, for even the craziest among us, even if these really crazy ideas fail, you know you’re not going to starve to death. You’re not going to be completely desolate.”

Rosedale put it another way: “We huddle. We’re herd animals. We come here and we seek each other’s warmth and that works. We’re also, I believe, safe here. When you’re safe, it makes your more open and friendly. When you’re open and friendly, you share things with each other, like how to set up a server or how to get somebody who knows a lot of social media marketing stuff or how to find a developer. You share that information freely with each other,” he said.

“Even if you don’t share very much — and my hypothesis from studying this behaviorally is that actually we don’t do that much here — but that little bit that we do share in Silicon Valley adds up to a lot,” Rosedale said. “If you have a good idea in Lisbon, Portugal, if you have a good idea in Paris, France, you hide it from everyone else, right? You hide it from everyone else because it’s a precious gem and if that idea works, you’ll be successful. So what’s happening in San Francisco is, you have these strange confluences of people driven by the fact that people are both engaging in lot of projects and then willing to share and talk about them,” he said.

The implications of that have powered his new business.

“One of the things I’m fascinated by is the question of whether with Coffee and Power ([the name of Philip's newest company] we could build an app that will get you to do that anywhere.” Rosedale said. “Could we get people to connect at this level even in Omaha?” In other words, due to the density, or lack of it, in places such as Omaha, you’re looking to connect but not only with 20 people within its population of 100,000 — with Coffee and Power you’re connected to thousands of people around the world. “On top of that,” Rosedale said, “what if I can make it so that the 50 people at a time who are looking for team members in Omaha can find them? You can kind of see them if they’re near you. You can shrink the geography,” he said.

“I think the most important thing is not just finding them or talking to them. It’s not enough actually to break the ice, but what if you could see a bunch of little short statements about what they were doing yesterday and what they’re doing right now?”

In my next blog, I’ll talk to the CEO of TopCoder — the newest way to write software fast and cheap.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: Second Life: How a Virtual World Became a Reality

In this blog, I’m introducing you to the work of Philip Rosedale, who set out on a very bold mission to create a virtual world accessible to the masses. How does one even think about doing something on this scale? What are the lessons learned? Enjoy!

I caught up with Philip Rosedale, the creator of Second Life, a brilliant entrepreneur and a close friend, at Singularity University. Philip is one of the most expansive thinkers I know, with a passion for creating communities and motivating people to be effective and powerful entrepreneurs.

As a reader of this blog you already know my passion for “origin stories” for people’s companies, so finding out how and why Rosedale started one of the most ambitious Internet companies of the last decade was a real treat for me.

“I started doing electronics when I was a little kid, in the 5th or 6th grade, buying computer parts at a swap meet and writing my first programs,” Philip told me. “Simple things just blew my mind with respect to the sort of infinite simulation or combinatorial possibility inside the computer. My personal obsession from my childhood was that I just wanted to recreate reality inside the computer and then go in there,” Rosedale said.

Rosedale had studied physics at college and after graduation set out as an entrepreneur. “I had started a small company doing database inventory control, and decided to move the business up to San Francisco,” he said. “My timing for landing in Silicon Valley, at the center of the Internet, was perfect.”

“At that time I told my friends that I was eventually going to build a virtual world, but the systems weren’t up to speed,” continued Rosedale. “There was insufficient bandwidth and no 3D, even on desktop computers,” Rosedale said. “So I decided that I was going to have to lay low and work on something else entrepreneurial with this Internet ‘thing’ while I waited for the future to catch up,” Rosedale said.

Like anyone inspired by a bold idea, Rosedale had the confidence that he could eventually make it happen: “I was just so insanely motivated to build that place that I could see in my head.” He remained on high alert waiting for the signal that would allow him to take action and move ahead.

That signal came while Rosedale was working at Real Networks in Seattle — the Internet software company behind such companies as RealAudio, RealVideo, RealPlayer and RealDownloader. (Rosedale actually created Real Video.) While there he met Mitch Kapor, the founder of Lotus 1-2-3 and Lotus Notes who later went on to become kind of a benefactor behind Second Life.

“It was the availability of broadband over DSL that re-launched my quest for creating my 3D virtual world,” said Rosedale. “When that bandwidth became available to the home, I was like, ‘Oh my God, I can do it — I can build Second Life!’ You get that moment when you just feel like it can be done or, at least, it’s not too crazy to try and do it. In the next couple of weeks I packed up from Seattle and came back to San Francisco and started Second Life,” Rosedale said.

I asked Rosedale how he had raised money for such a crazy idea. His answer: “I didn’t.” Rosedale had made enough money when Real Networks went public that he was able to invest about $1 million of his own money in getting Second Life started.

“Unfortunately, even with my $1 million it wasn’t fundable,” he said. “If you have an idea as crazy and bold as Second Life I can guarantee you one thing: those traditional venture capitalists that are loaded with billions of dollars are not waiting to fund ideas like this,” he said.

Still, he convinced a few forward-thinkers (Mitch Kapor among them) to help fund Second Life, and now, some dozen years later, Second Life has more than 20 million registered users and remains a success. “The company’s about 175 employees in size today,” Philip said, “and it’s very profitable because those users on Second Life are able to do really cool things with it and they’re able to get value out of it. In turn, Second Life as a company is able to share in some of that as revenue. The GDP of Second Life today is somewhere between $600 million and $700 million a year in transactions between people. Most of those transactions are things like users building and selling clothing, furniture design, to other users — essentially people building a virtual world and then selling that virtual world to themselves.”

I asked Rosedale to summarize his lessons learned from creating Second Life. If you were advising an entrepreneur who wanted to do something as big and bold as Second Life, what are your top five pieces of advice — what to do and what not to do? Here are his answers:

1. Have real passion. “If a crystal ball told you that this was going to be huge and have a big impact on the world, but that in the end you would not make much money, would you still want to work on it? If no, stop,” said Rosedale.

2. Don’t raise very much money. “If your idea is really big, too much money will probably increase the risk of failure,” continued Rosedale. “Because there are many more ways to spend money to fail than win.”

3. Encourage people other than yourself to take genuine risk by your side. “Don’t shoulder the burden of proof alone.”

4. If the idea is really new and unique and big, other people will all think it is bad and is going to fail. “You will have to do it against the best advice of others — see point #1.”

5. Be good to people, both inside and outside the company. “Being bad is stressful and will occupy your mind. If you are working on something really amazing,” Rosedale reflected, “you will need that focus for the product and the company, not for worrying about people you’ve screwed.”

In my next blog, I’m going to continue my talk with Philip Rosedale, and detail his beliefs regarding the future of entrepreneurship and the workforce.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: 5 Steps to Cutting Costs Through Open Source: DIY Drones

In this blog, I’m continuing my exploration of what Chris Anderson’s company DIY Drones has done in using open-source methods to create products that are exponentially less expensive to make.

After more than a decade as the editor of Wired magazine, Chris Anderson started the company of his dreams — a robotics manufacturing company called 3D Robotics, to produce the autonomous flying vehicles coming out of DIY Drones. When it came time to choose a co-founder and the CEO for his company, Chris didn’t go with an MIT Ph.D. or a Stanford professor. Instead, Anderson chose Jordi Muñoz, a 19-year-old high school student living in Tijuana, Mexico. How and why Anderson choose Muñoz is the opening theme of this blog. A subject I find fascinating and one that’s important for you to understand.

“If I had used the traditional construct for hiring when looking for someone to be co-founder and CEO of 3D Robotics,” Chris Anderson told me, “I probably would have gone to Stanford or MIT to look for people who had on their résumés the words ‘drone’ or maybe ‘company’ or possibly ‘college degree,’ maybe even ‘graduate degree.’ Instead, I ended up with a teenage high school student from Mexico. Now, it turns out that this teen, Jordi Muñoz, was the perfect person for the job. This job didn’t require a Ph.D.-quality drone engineer. The job involved creating an open-source robotics company in an unexplored space using low-cost resources and built on community participation. The people who went to MIT and Stanford are probably genius, but they probably didn’t know all those things.”

Today Jordi is a 26-year-old high school graduate living in San Diego, serving as CEO of a multimillion-dollar company. How he was hired, and the success of his role as CEO, reinforces the notion that the community brings the right person to the company. The community also brings a network of people who want to work for the company during their spare time, evening and weekends. These individuals aren’t motivated by the money; instead, they are doing it out of interest for the product being developed. These are people Chris could never afford to pay.

“Today, we have people who work for Apple, who are designing the iPhone by day and drones by night,” Chris said. “We have people who work for Google. We have people who work for NASA by day. By night they put in often as many hours working on our projects. We could not afford to hire them. They told me they’re unhireable. It’s weird: ‘You can’t pay us to work for you. However, we’ll work for you for free.’ That is a great concept. So, why do they do it? Is it generosity? No. Is it altruism? No. It’s enlightened self-interest — because they have a passion that for whatever reason isn’t tapped by their day job. And they’ve always wanted to do this.”

When Anderson started 3D Robotics, he looked at the Raven, a small military UAV made by AeroVironment, and wondered how he could take out at least 90 percent of the cost of creating it (or something very like it).

“I’m not sure we were even smart enough to know that such economies were possible,” Chris said. “We hadn’t actually seen a Raven or known its capabilities until a bit later. But at the end of the day, we took two to three orders of magnitude out of the price in military technology. Undercutting military procurement economics turns out to be not so hard.”

The military-grade UAV purchased by the Defense Department cost it between $300,000 to $400,000 for the full system. Chris’ company ended up building what’s known as a Quadcopter, similar to a Raven in overall capabilities, that costs about $300, or basically 1 percent of the cost of a similar UAV such as the Raven.

The secret was the community, and the use of open-sourcing.

During a recent trip to the EAA’s (Experimental Aircraft Association) Oshkosh AirVenture air show in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, Anderson found a whole host of eager hobbyists and enthusiasts interested in working on fun and innovative aerospace-related projects. “The world’s garages are full of people with lot of energy and passion, working on great ideas. What they need most is a better mechanism for collaboration,” he said.

“The real magic happens when you combine the kind of collaboration we enable at DIY Drones with what’s going on in electronics,” Anderson said, “with super-powerful chips and processors available for the hobbyist at a fraction of the cost of only a few years ago. The recognition that we have infinite processing, infinite sensing, wireless imaging at consumer electronics economies of scale — which is to say, cheap and available and easy to use — that’s the big breakthrough here. We’ve got a hammer that combines open-source innovation plus smartphone integration. So let’s start hitting things with a hammer.” Anderson plans to take on a number of other aerospace hardware projects where his approach can “demonetize” the cost, reducing it by 99 percent or more.

I asked Anderson to outline how a community can reduce the cost of product development by one or two orders of magnitude — what are the advantages and pitfalls. Here’s Anderson’s list of five areas to keep in mind.

Don’t charge for intellectual property. Making things open-source brings the cost down. Effectively the participants contribute their ideas and labor for free, and what you pay for is the hardware. “In electronics there’s what is called the bill of materials, which is the fundamental cost of the components,” Anderson explained. “Then there’s the final cost of the product. For something like military electronics for military autopilot, the bill of materials might be $100 and the autopilot, essentially the software, might cost $10,000.” Anderson continued, “There is a huge difference between the cost and the price. That difference is mostly labor in the form of R&D and intellectual property, plus the cost of doing business in the form of legal costs, sales cost and profit. The alternative, what we use with our open-source approach of DIY Drones and 3D Robotics, is to price the final products at 2.6 times the bill of materials. That 2.6 number is a 140 percent margin for the wholesaler — that’s the people who make it — and another 40 percent margin for the retailer. That’s the distributors who ultimately sell. That’s fair. You can build a business on a 40 percent margin.”
Be prepared to be ripped off. “The Chinese cloned us in seven days, Chris said. “We put in tens of thousands of dollars of our own R&D cost (R&D cost is not zero, but is still a lot lower than the military invests in it). We did all the work and then they just took our files and cloned us.”
Despite theft from some quarters, the crowd will make your product better. “Along with cloning, though, what’s going to happen is someone else is going to take your files and say, ‘I could have done that better,’” Chris said. “And they’re going to modify it and they’re going to do a derivative design and then they’re going to either sell that or send it back and say, ‘You should do this instead.’ That’s what’s great.”
Open-source leads to regulatory breaks. Many people who try to do big bold things in the world find out it’s not about the money or the technology: It’s about the regulatory hurdles that will try and stop you. “If you are Lockheed Martin or Boeing or anybody else and you want to create an autopilot, first of all you have to get it certified, you have to go through this long approval process, through the military procurement chain,” Chris said. “You’re not allowed to test it in the air unless you have an approval from the FAA — which governs unmanned vehicle use in the national aerospace. If, on the other hand, you’re a kid, an amateur, there’s an exemption for you and you can fly it in the park all day. Amateur use, i.e., non-commercial use, is a kind of safe zone. By and large, open-source qualifies as public domain, so the active technology being created free by the Internet and shared by the Internet means it’s exempted.” Chris Anderson went on to explain how this is also true for State Department ITAR regulations and even FCC regulations.
By giving it away for free, liability issues evaporate. “It turns out if you’re shipping to end users, to consumers, you have to get FCC certification,” Chris said. “If you’re shipping to developers, you don’t. It’s the last person who touches the product before it ends up in a blister pack that has to get it certified. As long as you’re shipping to other DIYers, you’re exempt from that. Open-source is a get-out-of-jail-free card for the gnarly barriers to entry that have slowed innovation so far,” Chris said. “By the way, big military industrial companies love regulation. The more rules, the better, because they’ve got an army of lawyers.”

Basically, Chris said, open-source hardware is the “hammer” to break open innovation of all sorts. “Right now the technology is available. You can do it. With this hammer called open-source hardware, people are going to reverse engineer things. What’s going to happen is that the first one is going to suck. But it was open and DIY, and that’s cool enough. The next one’s going to suck less. They’re going to find a way to do something totally cool and cheap.”

In my next blog, I’m going to introduce you to my friend Philip Rosedale, a brilliant entrepreneur and the creator of Second Life, who has come up with ways for entrepreneurs to change the way people think about barriers and to change the they think about work.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: The DIY Revolution — How to Remove 99 Percent of the Cost from Your Product

In this blog, I’m introducing you to one of the premier do-it-yourself sites out there, Chris Anderson’s DIY Drones, and how his kind of open-source innovation is changing the way products are created.

I’m a huge fan of Chris Anderson’s DIY Drones, and how his model of creating a Do-It-Yourself (DIY) community allows him (and YOU) to be surrounded by the smartest people around the world to help implement a dream.

Anderson has been the editor-in-chief of Wired magazine and, not surprisingly, something of a geek dad (Note: He stepped down at the end of 2012 to concentrate on his new business and to write his next book). In 2008, he decided to spend the weekend with his kids building a LEGO Mindstorms robot and a remote-control airplane. But nothing went as planned. The robots bored the kids — “Dad, where are the lasers?” — and the airplane crashed into a tree right out of the gate. While Anderson was cleaning up the wreckage, he began wondering what would happen if he used the LEGO autopilot to fly the plane. His kids thought the idea was cool — for about four hours — but Anderson was hooked. “I didn’t know anything about the subject,” he says, “but I recognized that I could buy a gyro from LEGO for $20 and turn it into an autopilot that my nine-year-old could program. That was mind-blowing. Equally amazing was the fact that an autonomous flying aircraft is on the Department of Commerce’s export-control restrictions list — so my nine-year-old had just weaponized LEGO.”

Curious to learn more, Anderson started a nonprofit online community called DIY Drones. In the beginning, the projects were simple, but as his community grew (quickly surpassing 10,000 members), so did its ambition. The cheapest military-grade unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on the market is the Raven. Built by AeroVironment, this drone retails for $35,000, with the full system for $250,000. One of DIY Drones’ first major projects was an attempt to build an autonomous flying platform with 90 percent of Raven’s functionality at a radically reduced price. The members wrote and tested software, designed and tested hardware, and ended up with the QuadCopter. It was an impressive feat. In less than a year, and with almost no development costs, they created a homebrew drone with 90 percent of the Raven’s functionality for just $300 — literally 1 percent of the military’s price. Nor was this a one-off demonstration. The DIY Drones community has developed 100 different products in the same way, each in under a year, for essentially zero out-of-pocket development cost.

I invited Chris Anderson to Singularity University to deliver a lecture and be interviewed for this blog. First and foremost on my mind was the question about how one goes about creating a community and securing the talent to do something as incredible as DIY Drones.

“Bill Joy’s famous quote, ‘Whoever you are, the smartest people in the world don’t work for you’ is as valid as ever,” Anderson said. “This was a paradox of 20th-century management. The reason companies were created in the first place was to minimize transaction costs through a shared vision and shared responsibility. You hire people and you put them under one roof and you give them roles and responsibilities so that you can get things done. The consequences of this approach, of course, means that you needed to first find the people, hire them, use some filter to determine whether they were sufficiently qualified. We end up focused on people’s ‘credentials.’ The reality is that most of the world’s smartest people don’t have the right credentials,” he said.

“They don’t speak the right language. They didn’t grow up in the right country. They didn’t go to the right university. They don’t know about you and you don’t know about them. They’re not available, they already have a job. All of these issues are barriers to putting them under one roof to solve the employment equation of 20th-century management,” he said. “We now have an alternative to this approach. The alternative is building a team in public: If you build communities first and open source them, you don’t have to find the right people. They find you.”

Anderson started the DIY Drones community fueled by his enthusiasm around what he had discovered and what he hoped to do. Chief among his learning on making the community work was his willingness to be open, authentic and intimate. “I created a social network,” he said, “this simple act of chronicling my journey of discovery in this field I knew nothing about, doing it in public on a site that invited other people to participate. The simple act of choosing to share my ignorance, my discoveries and be willing to be stupid in public invited other people to say, ‘I’ve been wondering that too, and here’s an answer.’ If you’re stupid, then people will help you, but if you act super-smart, people will be scared to help you.”

This openness invites openness. “It’s intimacy, it’s authenticity, it’s willingness to ask dumb questions in public,” Anderson said. “That simple lowering of the barrier to entry along with things like Arduino [the open-source electronics prototyping platform], which was the platform we ended up choosing, allowed people to see that it was really easy to get started.”

DIY Drones now has 30,000 members, with 1.5 million pageviews a month. Not large by media standards, “but big by robotic standards,” Anderson said. The site offers kits for UAV copters, planes and more.

Chris built the site not by emphasizing its high-tech credentials, but by opening it up to innovation from the crowd. By choosing to work with Arduino, which offers accessibility but not the highest-tech products, Anderson was mocked at first. But in the end, he said, that accessibility was what was important. “It’s easy to pick up, hard to master — and we bet on social rather than technology,” allowing the community to come back with better ideas for using it.

“We bet that the community-accessibility aspects of Arduino would ultimately overwhelm any of the kind of technical specs,” he said. “That proved out to be right. Today we have one of the highest-performing autopilots out there with one of the lowest-performing hardware platforms. What does that tell you? It tells you that smart people and great algorithms at the end of the day are the most important things. It’s not about your clock speed. It’s about the brains and the vision and the talents that went into the crowd.”

So how do you use a community to drive innovation in a new product? Here are Chris Anderson’s top three lessons learned:

Be open in everything. “There was so much to learn, and everything I learned I’d share because I didn’t have any particular pride in what I was supposed to know,” Anderson said. “Everybody had permission to post, and we had guidelines. Over time, others started following the guide, the same style and format, and then people started working on projects together and posting videos of those. They shared.”
Use version control. In other words, make it understandable. “The first thing we realized is that the secret to open source is two words: version control,” Anderson said. “Sharing is necessary but not sufficient. You need to share in a way that invites other people to participate. Until you commit something to a version-control system (i.e., a format where people understand how you’re documenting it, where changes can be made, tracked and reverted to if they’re wrong), it never takes off.”
Encourage participation. “We call it architecture participation,” Anderson said. “Architecture participation is like a great videogame: easy to start, hard to master. Architecture participation means that everybody sees this project and says there’s something for me to do, and whether that something is simple as correcting a typo in the documentation or submitting an incredible algorithm they’ve been working on for five years, you just find a way to plug it right into the existing architecture. It’s hard,” Anderson added. “It requires things that engineers don’t like to do, such as documentation, clear comments, being transparent about the plan, sharing stuff before it’s ready. That’s the hardest thing: getting people to share stuff before it’s done. Nothing good has ever happened by waiting until it’s done. It happens by putting it out there when you’re embarrassed about it and having people help you finish it.”

In my next blog, I’m going to continue exploring Chris Anderson’s DIY Drones. We’ll discuss how his model of creating a DIY community has also developed into new ways of hiring talented people, and of getting super-talented people to work for free.

NOTE: Over the next year, I’m embarking on a BOLD mission — to speak to top CEOs and entrepreneurs to find out their secrets to success. My last book Abundance, which hit No. 1 on Amazon, No. 2 on the New York Times and was at the top of Bill Gates’ personal reading list, shows us the technologies that empower us to create a world of Abundance over the next 20 to 30 years. BOLD, my next book, will provide you with tools you can use to make your dreams come true and help you solve the world’s grand challenges to create a world of Abundance. I’m going to write this book and share it with you every week through a series of blog posts. Each step of the way, I’ll ask for your input and feedback. Top contributors will be credited within the book as a special “thank you,” and all contributors will be recognized on the forthcoming BOLD book website. To ensure you never miss a message, sign up for my newsletter here.

Peter Diamandis: An X PRIZE for Jobs: Can We Radically Reinvent How We Create, Finance and Find Jobs in America?

We are living in extraordinary times, where technology is allowing small teams of individuals to accomplish what were once only the province of governments. Empowered by smart phones, the internet, artificial intelligence, ubiquitous networks, cloud computing, robotics and digital manufacturing, small teams are building platforms and companies that are touching the lives of billions, and solving problems once solely the domain of the public sector.

Burt Rutan and a small team of 30 engineers built a spaceship able to fly twice into space within two weeks; the winners of the Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup X PRIZE quadrupled the rate of cleaning up oil spills on the ocean surface; an area where a trillion dollar industry had failed to make improvements in 20 years. Three co-founders of Kickstarter built a crowd funding platform that will raise $150 million by the end of 2012, providing more funding than the National Endowment for the Arts. The two co-founders of Kiva created a global lending platform that has made more than $330 million dollars in loans to 817,000 borrowers with little or no collateral and achieved a 99 percent repayment rate.

How we solve today’s problems and who solves them are both changing in a dramatic fashion and this is a very good thing. We have a lot of challenges and one of them (the topic of this blog) is job creation in America. You know the stats: Over 20 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed; More than 50 percent of our recent college and high school grads fall into this category. At the same time we have 3 million jobs that aren’t being filled because applicants don’t have the proper training.

Who is going to solve this problem? Government? Perhaps, but frankly, I’d also like the smartest most passionate thinkers and entrepreneurs across our great nation all competing to beat this problem into submission. I’d love to have a lot of ideas tried in parallel with the hope of some true breakthroughs.

The challenge is that the day before something is truly a breakthrough it’s a crazy idea. And crazy ideas are very risky to attempt. If governments try and fail, there’s a congressional investigation. If a company fails, its stock price can take a hit and executive compensation follows next. One answer to this conundrum is incentive competitions. Put up a prize with an audacious goal, have lots of teams (large and small) attempt to solve it and only pay the winner in success.

Recently, an extraordinary organization called the Robin Hood Foundation raised $19 million to develop, launch and operate a series of Robin Hood X PRIZEs to combat poverty in New York, with the hope that what we learn in New York might be replicated in cities throughout the U.S. What prizes we develop and launch is yet to be determined. The goal is to aim at the root causes of poverty. Issues like education and literacy, reducing high school and college dropout rates, job skills training, and many others.

This blog is a request to crowd-source ideas for a series of Jobs X PRIZEs. My question to you is the following: What should the competition look like? What are the rules?

A great incentive competition (what we call an X PRIZE) has rules that are clear, measurable and objective.

In 1919 to promote aviation, Raymond Orteig offered up25,000 (now worth about5M) for the first person to fly from New York to Paris (won by Charles Lindberg). The Orteig Prize inspired nine teams to spend400,000 in their efforts and launched today’s500 billion aviation industry. Any person could enter, and the only thing being measured was where they took off and where they landed.

In 1996 to stimulate a vibrant commercial spaceflight industry, the X PRIZE announced the10 million Ansari X PRIZE offered to the first team to build a private spaceship able to launch 3 adults to 100 kilometers (62.5 miles) altitude twice in two weeks. This competition attracted 26 teams from 7 countries who spent100 million pursuing the goal. The winning spaceship, built by Burt Rutan and funded by Paul Allen, won the competition on October 4th, 2004 and lead to the creation of Virgin Galactic which is now selling seats on sub-orbital flights into space. Any non-government team could enter, and what was measured was the altitude reached, the days between flights and the number of people the ship could carry.

Given these as examples, what would your rules be for an X PRIZE intended to incentivize new ways to create, finance and find Jobs in America?

Here’s a quick primer in prize creation: In designing an X PRIZE, you’ll need to answer the following seven questions.

How much is the prize purse?

What’s the name of your proposed prize?

Who can compete? Who are the teams? (Individuals, companies, high schools, church groups, anyone?)

What specifically (in a clear, measurable and objective fashion) does the winning team need to achieve?

What exactly are you measuring? How do you measure it in a way that is easy and in which results can’t be falsified (i.e. no cheating!).

How long would the competition run for? Is the first to achieve this? Or the team that achieves the highest score in a set amount of time?

Can you imagine a telegenic finish that generates publicity as teams demonstrate their winning solution?

If you have ideas for the rules around a Jobs X PRIZE, we would LOVE to have you submit them here. This is a special Prize Submission form created jointly by the Huffington Post and X PRIZE to get your ideas. The best ideas may be used for a future set of Jobs X PRIZEs.

To read more from the X PRIZE Foundation on The Huffington Post, visit their blog archive here.