Tag Archives: Jobs

Sean Shiplet: Tech Companies and Software Developers: Think Beyond Silicon Valley for Great Jobs

Being in the software business for 27 years, we’ve seen it all: up and down economies, the evolution from clamshells and PDAs to today’s smartphones and tablets, and more. But one thing that hasn’t changed much in software development is the perception that all the good tech companies are in the “big cities,” especially within California.

With our headquarters in Naples, Florida and offices in Oklahoma City and Salt Lake City, we have been able to recruit top talent — especially software developers — which enables us to build great products while helping reduce unemployment. In fact, we find that our team enjoys living in cities with lower costs of living, while receiving comparable salaries and benefits.

Oklahoma City and Salt Lake City, for example, are great places to raise families with strong school systems, lower mortgages, and growing downtown areas. In fact, Oklahoma City-suburb Edmond is frequently rated one of the best places to live.

Attracting talent and developing innovative products has never been hindered by our location, a phenomenon experienced by the wider tech community. Austin, Texas and Bozeman, Montana are just two of the many non-coastal U.S. cities where tech startups are finding a home, and where jobs are being created to battle unemployment. Companies like ours face the same talent pool competition issues as Google and Facebook. Fortunately, we’re in a position where we can attract those wanting not only the startup feel, but also tremendous stability.

Technology companies based in Oklahoma, Kansas or Missouri aren’t necessarily filled with TPS reports, monotonous paperwork, and melatonin-producing meetings. In fact, some of America’s greatest tech organizations with enjoyable company cultures can be found outside of traditional tech hubs: Dell is located in Round Rock, Texas; Amazon is in Seattle, Washington; Citrix’s headquarters are in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and so on.

Take, for example, a la mode. We keep it fresh, like the Oklahoma weather, ever-changing. One month our employees may work on the latest iteration of a 30-year-old flagship product; the next, they may be assigned to a new product, service, feature, or market. We’re extremely self-critical, and it brings a lot of pressure, but we’re a team. We challenge people — you may be asked to take on a project requiring skills you’ve yet to learn. At first, few resources are allocated to these projects and everyone wears many hats. But to offset the occasional difficulties of the tech lifestyle, we have a fully-stocked café, soda fountain, and often cater.

I remember the startup feel we had when I started almost 20 years ago. We were ready to take on the world and had dreams of changing it, and we did just that. We’re a pioneer in workflow technology, solving digital supply chain and data gathering problems in one of the broadest sectors of the financial services industry for over a quarter century. If you’ve bought a home, sold one, or taken out a mortgage recently, odds are one of our products facilitated it. In the last decade, our technology has powered tens of millions of appraisals. Yep, a company primarily located in the Midwest is mission critical to the mortgage industry — and we are following in the footsteps of other companies being located where they are most needed, rather than in a brand-name location. The phenomenon of important technology companies in unexpected cities repeats itself again and again, from San Antonio to Chicago and others throughout the country.

So the next time you’re considering where to put your headquarters, consider that tech companies are created to help people think outside the box and forge new paths. You too can accomplish this goal by forgoing Silicon Valley and instead choosing a location that best suits your company — namely, your employees and your bottom line.

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

10 Highest-Paying Companies For Millennials

Fiscal Times:

For the most part, members of Gen Y, born between 1982 and 1993, have not lucked out in this economy. Many of them spent a fortune on college degrees that they’re barely using: They’re either fighting to land their first job or are stuck in low-paying jobs such as in retail, where a degree may not even be required. Though the national unemployment rate was 8.3 percent in July, 13.5 percent of people between the ages of 20 and 24 are currently out of work, while 9.3 percent of those 25 to 29 are unemployed. Not to mention the countless number who are underemployed.

RELATED: The 10 Best Cities For Young People To Find Jobs

Once they do find a job, many Gen Yers look for employment in companies that allow for flexible schedules and embrace their entrepreneurial spirit, but the average salaries for this age group are low. In 2011, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average weekly earnings for those 20-24 was $457 (or $23,764 annually) and $649 ($33,748 annually) for those 25-29.

RELATED: Why Good People Can’t Find Jobs

Yet at a handful of companies, Gen Y employees are raking it in. According to a new report by research firm Millennial Branding and from PayScale, Inc., which provides compensation data and software – the companies offering the best salaries to Gen Y employees are in technology. The research included information on millennials working at Fortune 500 companies, and in addition to median pay, it looked at the percentage of Gen Yers among employees, job satisfaction, job stress, meaningfulness of job, schedule flexibility and green score (the company’s environmental footprint as well as its management policies, programs and initiatives, and reporting practices connected to eco issues).

RELATED: Got A Degree? Get Ready To Settle For A Retail Job

Here’s a look at the 10 top-paying companies for millennials, according to the survey.

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Odd Jobs That Pay Big Bucks

LearnVest:

It’s time for a raise.

How about a new job?

How about a job that pays a lot more than you’d expect?

We headed to our favorite salary-searching websites (like Glassdoor.com) in search of unusual jobs with fat paychecks. Yep, they exist. And there are many more than you may think.

We found high-stress positions, like those of air-traffic controllers (they can make as much as $140,000 per year!), and jobs abroad, like submarine cook jobs (submarine cooks in Australia make $187,000 per year!). And we found jobs that you can do from your very own home.

Before we give away any spoilers on these surprising jobs, click into the slideshow to check ‘em out on your own.

Related Stories:
LearnVest’s Build Your Career Bootcamp
Old-Fashioned Homesteading is the New Feminist Career
Generation “Why Bother”: What It’s Really Like to Be a 20-Something

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Jessica Miller-Merrell: Facebook Jobs Will Positively Impact the U.S. Economy and Job Marketplace

Having spent more than some time in the HR and recruiting industry, I’ve seen the fall of traditional news media ‘help wanted’ ads, the growth of the job board industry, the decline of the job board and now the rise social media. While many have claimed each of these news and media distribution channels are the answer to our recruiting salvation, I disagree. I completely disagree.

Each one of these platforms offers the ability to reach a group of job seekers that is different and diverse. Because the American public is more diverse and different than ever before, this is why Facebook’s play in the job board marketplace is so appealing.

June’s Department of Labor numbers lists that 12.7 million Americans are out of work, and yet if you ask recruiters and organizational senior leaders, they say that hiring qualified candidates is more challenging than ever.  It is not the free and fluid job market that one might expect given our economy.  In fact, it’s down right difficult to fill a single position. Hiring managers sift through the hundreds of resumes with a growing percentage of these candidates not being qualified for the position.

The job market right now is just like the supermarket during an impending snowstorm here in the Midwest, but in reverse. Customers out of fear rush to their nearest grocery or local market clearing the shelves. It’s a frenzy as people fight for bottled water, canned goods, and batteries many not even needing the additional supplies. Weather, like the hiring process and the economy is not a science and not 100 percent predictable. Companies advertise their opening using what I call the “spray and pray.” They send out their message to every job seeker hoping for a response, thereby creating a feeding frenzy of under-qualified, non-qualified, and desperate candidates. Qualified candidates are overlooked. Companies do nothing to explain the reason why the job seeker was turned down for the offer, and the frenzied cycle repeats again and again.

Facebook’s entry into the job board market could change all that. They offer the largest collective group of users throughout the globe, over one billion strong with Americans spending nearly 400 minutes a month on the world’s largest social network. Their platform offers companies and human resource managers up to the minute insights into their user base from photos to interests, and conversations not to mention killer trends and analytics. LinkedIn use is at just 17 minutes a month — see a push from Facebook in the coming months to suggest that users fully complete their profiles including their work history and experience as they prepare to launch their job board as part of the Social Jobs Partnership. ”Jobs” will be a collaborative effort which is what makes them very different from their soon to be social recruiting rival, LinkedIn.

Inside sources say Facebook won’t be launching the traditional job board we are familiar with.  Facebook will partner with non-profit organizations like Direct Employers and the National Association for Careers and Employers, government entities in addition to HR technology vendors like BranchOut and Work4Us. This is a solid strategy for Facebook as there are a number of technology companies and job boards who are ‘all in’ having established platforms, services, and apps for job seekers, recruiting, and hiring contained within Facebook. LinkedIn, however, has partners parting ways with Twitter saying ado to LinkedIn last month.

Facebook is right to be cautious in establishing their key relationships. They are not an expert when it comes to the employment market or the human resources tech space. Otherwise, they would have leveraged their site’s marketplace section in 2008 during the recession when companies first turned to social recruiting as a legitimate option in which to hunt, recruit, and fill open positions. Ninety-three percent of recruiters say they used LinkedIn or plan to in 2012 for recruiting versus Facebook which stands at 66 percent use in a 2012 Jobvite Study.

Facebook provides employers a real opportunity to leverage the entire job seeker as an individual customers, candidate, employee and consumer. Employers can and should build a long-term relationship built on trust, brand, and conversations. This combined with their potential analytics offerings can provide companies the whole story when it comes to job seeker and employee patterns, trends, likes, and dislikes and beyond.

Why Do Women Tend To Get Tapped For Top Jobs During A Crisis?

When it was announced Monday that Marissa Mayer, Google’s wonky-yet-glamorous top female executive, would take over as CEO of Yahoo, there was much rejoicing throughout the land. At least throughout the land of those who see Mayer’s new gig as a step toward gender equity.

But others wonder if, instead, Mayer, 37, who was famously “employee number 20” at Google, is headed toward a savage plunge off the “glass cliff.” That’s the term coined in 2008 by two British researchers at England’s University of Exeter for the tendency of troubled organizations to choose female leaders in times of acute crisis.

Peter Diamandis: An X PRIZE for Jobs: Can We Radically Reinvent How We Create, Finance and Find Jobs in America?

We are living in extraordinary times, where technology is allowing small teams of individuals to accomplish what were once only the province of governments. Empowered by smart phones, the internet, artificial intelligence, ubiquitous networks, cloud computing, robotics and digital manufacturing, small teams are building platforms and companies that are touching the lives of billions, and solving problems once solely the domain of the public sector.

Burt Rutan and a small team of 30 engineers built a spaceship able to fly twice into space within two weeks; the winners of the Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup X PRIZE quadrupled the rate of cleaning up oil spills on the ocean surface; an area where a trillion dollar industry had failed to make improvements in 20 years. Three co-founders of Kickstarter built a crowd funding platform that will raise $150 million by the end of 2012, providing more funding than the National Endowment for the Arts. The two co-founders of Kiva created a global lending platform that has made more than $330 million dollars in loans to 817,000 borrowers with little or no collateral and achieved a 99 percent repayment rate.

How we solve today’s problems and who solves them are both changing in a dramatic fashion and this is a very good thing. We have a lot of challenges and one of them (the topic of this blog) is job creation in America. You know the stats: Over 20 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed; More than 50 percent of our recent college and high school grads fall into this category. At the same time we have 3 million jobs that aren’t being filled because applicants don’t have the proper training.

Who is going to solve this problem? Government? Perhaps, but frankly, I’d also like the smartest most passionate thinkers and entrepreneurs across our great nation all competing to beat this problem into submission. I’d love to have a lot of ideas tried in parallel with the hope of some true breakthroughs.

The challenge is that the day before something is truly a breakthrough it’s a crazy idea. And crazy ideas are very risky to attempt. If governments try and fail, there’s a congressional investigation. If a company fails, its stock price can take a hit and executive compensation follows next. One answer to this conundrum is incentive competitions. Put up a prize with an audacious goal, have lots of teams (large and small) attempt to solve it and only pay the winner in success.

Recently, an extraordinary organization called the Robin Hood Foundation raised $19 million to develop, launch and operate a series of Robin Hood X PRIZEs to combat poverty in New York, with the hope that what we learn in New York might be replicated in cities throughout the U.S. What prizes we develop and launch is yet to be determined. The goal is to aim at the root causes of poverty. Issues like education and literacy, reducing high school and college dropout rates, job skills training, and many others.

This blog is a request to crowd-source ideas for a series of Jobs X PRIZEs. My question to you is the following: What should the competition look like? What are the rules?

A great incentive competition (what we call an X PRIZE) has rules that are clear, measurable and objective.

In 1919 to promote aviation, Raymond Orteig offered up25,000 (now worth about5M) for the first person to fly from New York to Paris (won by Charles Lindberg). The Orteig Prize inspired nine teams to spend400,000 in their efforts and launched today’s500 billion aviation industry. Any person could enter, and the only thing being measured was where they took off and where they landed.

In 1996 to stimulate a vibrant commercial spaceflight industry, the X PRIZE announced the10 million Ansari X PRIZE offered to the first team to build a private spaceship able to launch 3 adults to 100 kilometers (62.5 miles) altitude twice in two weeks. This competition attracted 26 teams from 7 countries who spent100 million pursuing the goal. The winning spaceship, built by Burt Rutan and funded by Paul Allen, won the competition on October 4th, 2004 and lead to the creation of Virgin Galactic which is now selling seats on sub-orbital flights into space. Any non-government team could enter, and what was measured was the altitude reached, the days between flights and the number of people the ship could carry.

Given these as examples, what would your rules be for an X PRIZE intended to incentivize new ways to create, finance and find Jobs in America?

Here’s a quick primer in prize creation: In designing an X PRIZE, you’ll need to answer the following seven questions.

How much is the prize purse?

What’s the name of your proposed prize?

Who can compete? Who are the teams? (Individuals, companies, high schools, church groups, anyone?)

What specifically (in a clear, measurable and objective fashion) does the winning team need to achieve?

What exactly are you measuring? How do you measure it in a way that is easy and in which results can’t be falsified (i.e. no cheating!).

How long would the competition run for? Is the first to achieve this? Or the team that achieves the highest score in a set amount of time?

Can you imagine a telegenic finish that generates publicity as teams demonstrate their winning solution?

If you have ideas for the rules around a Jobs X PRIZE, we would LOVE to have you submit them here. This is a special Prize Submission form created jointly by the Huffington Post and X PRIZE to get your ideas. The best ideas may be used for a future set of Jobs X PRIZEs.

To read more from the X PRIZE Foundation on The Huffington Post, visit their blog archive here.

Best Buy To Cut 2,400 Jobs

NEW YORK — Electronics retailer Best Buy Co. is laying off 600 staffers in its Geek Squad technical support division and 1,800 other store workers as it seeks to restructure operations and improve results, the company said Friday.

The cuts amount to about 1.4 percent of the company’s total staff of 167,000.

Best Buy is trying to combat the “showrooming” of its stores, as consumers test out products at its stores but go home and buy them cheaper online or at discounters. Interim CEO Mike Mikan has vowed the company is committed to fundamentally changing operations to improve results

Best Buy spokesman Bruce Hight says the layoffs are part of the company’s “ongoing turnaround plan.”

In March, the company announced a restructuring aimed at improving results. At the time, the company said it would close 50 of its U.S. big box stores, cut 400 corporate jobs and trim $800 million in costs. Meanwhile, the company, which has about 1,400 U.S. locations, planned to open 100 smaller and more profitable Best Buy Mobile stores throughout the country.

But shortly after that plan was announced, Best Buy’s then-CEO Brain Dunn abruptly left the company and Best Buy said it was investigating his relationship with a female employee. The investigation found he had had an inappropriate relationship with the staffer, and it also led to the departure of founder and chairman Richard Schulze, who knew about the relationship and didn’t alert the proper channels.

Since then, Mikan, who is in the running for permanent CEO, has vowed there will be “no sacred cows” as the company reviews its business.

Shares ended Friday trading down 15 cents at $21.59. The stock has fallen 8 percent this year.

Nokia Plans To Cut 10,000 Jobs

By Tarmo Virki

PARIS (Reuters) – Nokia plans to cut one in five jobs at its global cellphone business as it loses market share to rivals Apple and Samsung and burns through cash, raising new fears over its future.

In a second profit warning in nine weeks, Nokia said on Thursday that its phone business would post a deeper-than-expected loss in the second quarter due to tougher competition.

Once the world’s dominant mobile phone provider, Nokia was wrongfooted by the rise of smartphones and is struggling to keep up with Apple, Samsumg and Google. It is also losing market share in cheaper, more basic phones.

Chief Executive Stephen Elop is placing hopes of a turnaround on a new range of smartphones called Lumia, which use largely untried Microsoft Corp software. But Lumia sales have so far been slow, disappointing investors.

“The job cuts and profit warning underline the seriousness of the challenges Nokia is facing, particularly in light of the eye-watering competition from Apple and Samsung,” said Ben Wood, head of research at CCS Insight.

Nokia, whose cash position is increasingly scrutinized by investors, also said restructuring-related cash outflows would be around 650 million euros in the remaining three quarters of 2012 and around 600 million in 2013.

Shares in Finland-based Nokia were down 10.5 percent to 1.99 euros, below the psychologically important 2 euros mark last, not seen since 1996. The stock has crashed more than 70 percent since it announced the switch to Microsoft’s software in February 2011.

Analysts have said that even with the dramatic fall in the share price, the worsening outlook made it hard to judge how much lower the shares could go.

“I won’t comment on the stock price anymore, since it’s been seen over and over, that there is no definitive bottom,” said Evli analyst Mikko Ervasti.

“People are worried over Lumia sales. I think expectations for the third quarter will be cut,” said Nordea analyst Sami Sarkamies.

The job cuts, which include the closure of Nokia’s only plant in Finland, bring total planned cuts at the group since Elop took over as chief executive in 2010 to more than 40,000.

The move will result in additional restructuring charges of around 1 billion euros ($1.3 billion) by the end of 2013.

The company said it expects its operating margin in the second quarter to be below the negative 3 percent level reported in the first quarter. It previously forecast it would be similar to or below that level.

Nokia also said it would sell luxury phone business Vertu to venture firm EQT and revamp its management team.

(Editing by Erica Billingham)

Anav Silverman: Israeli Startup Helping Americans Find Jobs

As the U.S. economy suffers from a stagnant unemployment rate, an Israeli startup company is using innovative technology to change the way Americans search for and find jobs.

Utilizing social networking as its base, Jobsminer.com is the only job search engine that aggregates jobs in real time from social networks including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Plus and more. While such social networks are generally limited to family, friends or followers, JobsMiner offers a groundbreaking means to access job opportunities hidden within the vast and relatively untamed social networking frontier.

In unlocking these hidden jobs, JobsMiner presents potential employment opportunities that otherwise would have been missed by the job seeker.

If someone, for example, wants to search for potential jobs in Maine, a simple click on the website’s map of the state yields a list of jobs, ranging from office manager in Portland to registered nurse in Bangor, all drawn from various social networking sites. The job seeker can always tailor the search by specifying the job field he or she is interested in and the geographical area.

According to the company’s CEO, Ran Enoch, over 22 million Americans have used social networks to find their most recent job in 2011.

“The majority of jobseekers today use social networking,” Enoch told me in an exclusive interview.

“Ours is the first and only online tool that searches all social media websites for relevant jobs,” he added.

2012-05-29-JobsMiner.JPG

Photo Courtesy: JobsMiner.com / Description: The team behind JobsMiner.com in the company’s headquarters in Kiryat Ono, Israel.

JobMiner’s social media search engine is based upon the unique technology of Makam, a leading Israeli company which has been monitoring and analyzing social media for seven years, providing services in the fields of government, security, and healthcare to thousands of users in organizations both in Israel and internationally, including the U.S.

“The reason that we chose to launch JobsMiner in the United States is due to the current economic climate of the country and because of our familiarity with the market there,” explained Enoch.

“Our search engine crawls through social networks, blogs and forums, filtering out the clutter and presenting those job opportunities that are relevant to the job seeker. What we realized is that company employees many times will post about a job opening on their social networks before it even appears on the company’s website or job board. JobsMiner gets this information out to a much wider circle of people in the quickest possible way.”

Launched in February 2012, JobsMiner has already helped countless Americans locate jobs, according to Enoch.

Joyce Lain Kennedy, a Los Angeles Times syndicated careers columnist predicts that JobsMiner “holds the potential to play a major role in the 21st century job search revolution.” She described JobsMiner in her column as “an impressive burst of creative energy to refresh your job search.”

With ten Israeli employees who oversee one million job postings per month, JobsMiner is a small startup company located in Kiryat Ono near Tel Aviv, and is looking to expand its services.

“Following our success in the American market, we are looking at the job market in Spain right now,” said Enoch. The company is also looking elsewhere in Europe and plans to make its job service technology available in its own home country in the coming months, with the Hebrew-language system already set.

“Even with our plans to continue expanding, one thing will not change and that is that we plan to always keep our services free of charge,” Enoch told me. JobsMiner provides its services for free as it generates revenue through clicks on Google advertisements on its site.

“In general, our company’s vision is to continue to help people find work across the globe,” concludes Enoch.

Terry Connelly: Top 10 Reasons Why Facebook’s IPO Went Badly

10. It came to market too late to begin with! The last private equity round Facebook raised valued the company at about $50 billion. And the current market is taking the public shares back toward that level, which is 50 percent below the initial IPO pricing.

9. Bad news travels fast, but not far. The bad news about Facebook’s declining earnings profile, traced to the fairly recent shift of more users to mobile access, which is less conducive to Facebook’s advertising revenue. By the way, this transition had not yet become significant at the time of Facebook’s last private equity round.

8. Large brand ad pulls.
General Motors’ decision to pull its Facebook advertising (but, notably, not its Facebook page) because GM is said to have judged those ads ineffective in driving car sales. This conclusion is particularly suspect, however, because the main complaint in integrated marketing circles about social media ad campaigns in general is that the tools for measuring their effectiveness are at a very primitive stage. Any judgment regarding effectiveness is currently based on pretty flimsy evidence either way.

7. Downtrends and downdrafts. Morgan Stanley’s and other underwriters’ stock analysts expanded upon Facebook’s own public announcement of a downtrend in earnings trend per #9 above by telling institutional clients that they were lowering their unpublished earnings estimates for Facebook in the quarters ahead. This created a downdraft in previously indicated institutional pre-IPO “buy on open” order that retail investors were unaware of. It is probable that the actions of these analysts were within the letter of the law, but will lead to calls for reform in the IPO regulatory structure that actually forbids analysts from publishing such conclusions before and for several weeks after their firms underwrite an IPO. But it does allow them to have private conversations with institutional customers that disclose such changes of opinion. As Shakespeare knew, the law can sometimes be an ass.

6. No good deed goes unpunished. Facebook’s own pre-announcement that a mismatch was developing between its subscriber base and its most effective advertising platforms: honest, yes, but no good deed goes unpunished. This was the equivalent of an already-public company giving very conservative ‘forward earnings guidance” when it announces quarterly earnings — even if the actual reported quarterly earning “beat the Street” estimate. Negative guidance very frequently brings the stock price down hard.

5. Greedy secrets, perhaps? In the face of negative news and predictably shrinking institutional buying appetite, Facebook and Morgan Stanley agreed to up the projected offering price range and expand the number of shares on offer: Hello? Were they listening to their own stock analysts and sales forces? Or, were they just getting greedy knowing that retail investors did not know what they knew?

4. Greed plus hubris equals disaster. On top of that, they allowed a raft of insiders to sell their shares as part of the IPO. Usually most all insiders wait until the first “follow-on” offering post-IPO — a long standing tradition to protect the success of IPO’s lest they be seen just as a chance for insiders to unload their shares. Facebook and Morgan Stanley doubled-down against this tradition.

3. Push Wall Street, it may push back. Facebook and Morgan Stanley structured the public shares as having essentially no voting power to effect management; Mark Zuckerberg’s leading but minority shareholdings as a result leave him in majority control of the company. Much like Rupert Murdoch’s control of News Corp. Fully disclosed, nothing illegal, but why emulate Murdoch and expect major potential shareholders like CalPERS to willingly go along. Sticking your finger in Wall Street’s eye is not a gesture of respect.

2. Boy in the hood. The hoodie incident at Facebook’s first “roadshow” with investors in New York. Trying to look like you’re being like Steve Jobs in terms of haberdashery before you’ve proven to public shareholders that you are Steve Jobs in terms of performance is just a bit forward. It was predictably perceived as a send-up to the folks in suits (men and women) who actually buy shares that give Facebook the means to not care about profits but only about making us a more connected universe. ALL successful businesses start by meeting an unmet consumer need — Facebook is not holier than thou, it just seems to think it invented customer-focused strategy — like those who view “network effects” as something invented by some brilliant 20-somethings in the 21st century, forgetting for example three centuries of history of businesses like stock exchanges!

1. NASDAQ strikes out with the bases loaded. NASDAQ’s unforgivable incompetence in not stress-testing in advance its confirmation delivery systems in the face of projected demand, and then going forward with trading when they knew the system wasn’t working well at all. This disaster led to a “no confidence” vote by first-day traders in the truth of moment-to-moment pricing, which is the world’s loudest “sell signal.”

All this being said, a lot of nonsense is being said about Facebook by today’s market commentators — some downplay or even deny that the company makes any money — this is not dot-com time — Facebook does have earnings, $4 billion annually at last count. It does have customers, 900 million at last count. It does know what a smart phone is.

Rest assured, there is a lot of smart money out there that is delighted that Facebook is off to such a rocky public-company start — because they know in a few days or weeks, they can pick up a stock in the 20′s that will most likely be worth a lot more than that in a couple of years: see the history of Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, etc. Welcome back from your honeymoon, Mark!

Switching To Green Economy Would Create Millions Of Jobs: UN

GENEVA (AP) — The U.N. agencies for labour and environment say nations can achieve a net gain of 15 million to 60 million jobs over the next two decades by taking better care of the planet.

A study released Thursday by the U.N.’s International Labor Organization and Environment Program says some jobs would inevitably be lost by switching to a “greener” economy, but net gains of 0.5 per cent to 2 per cent of total global employment are possible mainly through more renewable and efficient energy use, particularly in construction.

Most of the net employment gains are expected in agriculture, forestry, fishing, energy, manufacturing, recycling, building and transportation.

ILO Director-General Juan Somavia said the study — meant to influence international policy-makers — shows “we don’t have to choose between protecting the environment and creating jobs.”

GREEN JOBS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM

Switching To Green Economy Would Create Millions Of Jobs: UN

GENEVA (AP) — The U.N. agencies for labour and environment say nations can achieve a net gain of 15 million to 60 million jobs over the next two decades by taking better care of the planet.

A study released Thursday by the U.N.’s International Labor Organization and Environment Program says some jobs would inevitably be lost by switching to a “greener” economy, but net gains of 0.5 per cent to 2 per cent of total global employment are possible mainly through more renewable and efficient energy use, particularly in construction.

Most of the net employment gains are expected in agriculture, forestry, fishing, energy, manufacturing, recycling, building and transportation.

ILO Director-General Juan Somavia said the study — meant to influence international policy-makers — shows “we don’t have to choose between protecting the environment and creating jobs.”

GREEN JOBS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM

Aaron Sorkin Shares Early Details About Upcoming Steve Jobs Biopic

Acclaimed screenwriter Aaron Sorkin earned himself an Academy Award in 2011 for “The Social Network,” a feature film that dramatized the founding of Facebook. Now, Sorkin is once again re-immersing himself in the tech world as he tackles the life of venerable Apple co-Founder Steve Jobs for an upcoming biopic.

Taking the stage at AllThingsD’s D10 Conference on May 30, Sorkin offered a few early details about the state of the Steve Jobs project.

Sorkin admitted that he hasn’t yet written very much of the screenplay, which doesn’t yet have a title or a star and will be based on Walter Isaacson’s popular biography of Jobs. (Another film about Jobs, currently titled “Jobs,” is also in production; the film stars Ashton Kutcher.)

“It’s a process of procrastination, where you’re trying to figure out where the movie is going,” he said, according to TechCrunch.

While he may have a long way to go on the script, the former “West Wing” writer has obviously given the Steve Jobs movie and its main character a lot of thought.

“I can’t judge the character,” Sorkin told All Things D’s Walt Mossberg. “He has to, for me, be a hero. I have to find the parts of him that are like me. I have to be able to defend this character….To put it as simply as possible, you want to make a character as if they are making their case to God why they should be let into heaven.”

He also spoke about early hesitations he had about signing on for the project. From Engadget’s live blog:

[T]this was a little like writing about The Beatles. There are so many people out there that know him and revere him; I saw a minefield of disappointment. [...] [A]ll I can say at this early stage is that you should think of this as a painting, not a photograph. There could probably be many movies about Jobs [...] Steve Jobs is a big enough person and led a big enough life to make multiple movies.

Sorkin also discussed his soon-to-premier HBO show “The Newsroom,” which, in the same vein as the Steve Jobs movie and “The Social Network,” highlights the importance of tech in digital media.

“Obviously, digital media plays a huge role in the show,” said Sorkin, as reported by Engadget. “There’s a character that’s extremely into the Internet and the power it has — there’s a clip where he looks at the uprising an Cairo, and how the people that report the news first get it themselves, which is almost always digital.”

Check out the rest of Aaron Sorkin’s interview with Walt Mossberg on All Things D.

What would you most like to see from Sorkin’s Steve Jobs biopic? Share your thoughts with us in the comments.

7 Fascinating Things You Never Knew About Tim Cook

At AllThingsD’s D10 conference, Apple CEO Tim Cook was as mum on upcoming products as he usually is on his private life, which he actually did shed a little light on in his interview with ATD’s Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg.

Cook sat down on stage with the pair on May 29 at the site’s D: All Things Digital event to kick off the rest of the D10 conference, which runs from May 29 to May 31.

Over the course of his more than two-hour-long interview, he managed to drop a few facts about himself, including who he looks up to, how he feels in relation to the late Steve Jobs and more.

Flip through the slideshow below to see what he said at the D10 conference and to learn several more fascinating facts about Cook from other recent interviews he’s given. Which fact surprised you most? Let us know in the comments.

‘I Am Not Steve Jobs’

Apple CEO Tim Cook has said his goal is not to replace founder Steve Jobs.

Speaking at the All Things Digital D10 conference in his first live media interview, Cook said: “Steve was a visionary. My role was never to replace him.”

Cook gave a wide ranging interview, although as is traditional for Apple he gave few hints about its future products.

Apple’s CEO, who took over after the death of founder Jobs last year from cancer, said that it was an exciting time to be the head of the company, joking he wished he could describe the things he’d seen but was not allowed to talk about.

But when pressed about his style of leadership by interviewers Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher, Cook said he did not want to emulate the company’s co-founder.

“I’ve never felt the weight of trying to be Steve. It’s not who I am and it’s not my goal in life,” he said.

“I am who I am, and I’m focused on that, and being a great CEO of Apple.”

Cook said it took him a few months to refocus after Jobs’ death.

“I think he taught all of us that life is fragile,” he said.

Among his more interesting comments, Cook said that Apple was not interested in being in the “console business” but that gaming was increasingly important to its bottom line.

Cook said:

Gaming has kind of evolved a bit. More people play on portable devices. Where we might go in the future, we’ll see. Customers love games. I’m not interested in being in the console business in what is thought of as traditional gaming. But Apple is a big player today and things in the future will only make that bigger.

He added that Apple was “doubling down” on its voice assistant feature Siri, first seen in the iPhone 4S released last October.

“I think you’ll be really pleased with some of the things coming over the coming months,” he said.

Cook added that Apple TV remained “an area of intense interest” for the company:

I think most people, maybe not all, but many people would say this is an area in their life they’re not really pleased with. You know, they might not be pleased with many things about it. The whole TV experience. So, it’s an interesting area, so we’ll have to see what we do.

He also hinted at a closer collaboration with Facebook, which is so far not as integrated into its mobile operating system iOS as Twitter or email.

“Stay tuned,” he said.

Tim Cook Offers Cryptic Clues To Huge Apple Secret

Gather ’round, Apple enthusiasts. It’s time for some iTV talk.

Apple CEO Tim Cook took the stage on Tuesday night at AllThingsD’s D10 conference in San Francisco to discuss patent wars, controversies in the company’s supply chain and plans for upcoming products. One topic that interviewers Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg were particularly keen to dissect: the long-rumored but never confirmed Apple-branded HDTV set.

Cook at D10 firmly refused to mention explicitly any plans the company might have to manufacture what is already referred to as an “iTV. ” He did say, however, that television is “an area of intense interest for [Apple].”

Many believe Apple has already secured or is working to secure partnerships for streaming and syndicated content that would be available on such a device. Other rumors claim a potential Apple television set will feature Siri-like voice control and may even accept touchless gesture input.

Currently, Apple offers a product called the Apple TV, a set-top box that the user connects to a separate television to watch streaming media from sites like YouTube and Netflix, as well as content purchased from iTunes. While the device hasn’t enjoyed the success of the MacBook, iPhone or iPad, the Apple TV may provided clues to the company’s plans for new products and strategies.

Cook noted for Mossberg and Swisher that customers bought 2.8 million Apple TV devices last year, and that Apple sold nearly as many set top boxes in the early months of 2012. According to Business Insider’s Henry Blodget, this puts Apple on track to sell as many as 8 million Apple TV devices before the year is out. Comparing those figures to Apple’s sales of iPhones (35.1 million), iPads (11.8 million) and Macs (4 million) during the first three months of 2012 reinforce Steve Jobs’ assertion that the Apple TV is merely a “hobby” device, an assertion Jobs made at the 2007 D conference. Nevertheless, Tim Cook stressed on Tuesday night, “[Apple is] not a hobby kind of company.”

“Our tendency is to do very few things,” said Cook, according to a live blog provided by The Verge. “And, if something creeps in and isn’t a big success, we get it out of the way and put our energies on something else. Apple TV though, you see what we’ve done. We’ve stuck in this.”

The question is, why would Apple hold on to a product that would never be the runaway success that some of its larger product lines have become?

At the Goldman Sachs Technology Confernece in February, Cook spoke of the Apple TV’s potential to lead Apple into greater success elsewhere: “If we kept following our intuition and kept pulling the string, we might find something that was larger.”

Apple seems to have merely dipped its toes into this market and doesn’t appear to be shrinking back from the relative chill. Will the company’s next move be to take a running leap and pull off the cannonball it seems poised for? Will we see a major shakeup in TV hardware and content distribution? Cook’s sort-of answer, per Engadget’s D10 live blog:

Here’s the way we’d look at that. Not just at this area, but other areas. ‘Can we control the key technology? Can we make a significant contribution beyond what others have done in this area? Will this product be one that we want?’ That’s what we’d ask about any new product category. That’s what we ask about products within families that we’ve already announced.

In a word: maybe.

Anything’s possible, Cook teased again and again during the rest of the interview. When pressed more broadly about future products, Cook vowed that Apple will “double down on secrecy” and coyly talked around “incredible” things the company has in store. (Closest at hand is Apple’s yearly Worldwide Developers Conference, which kicks off on June 11, when Apple is expected to announce new MacBooks, the next version of iOS, though most likely not the next iPhone or an HDTV.)

Check out All things D’s official live blog to read more insights from Tim Cook about Apple’s patent wars with rival device makers, its “tumultuous” relationship with Facebook, Steve Jobs’ legacy and much, much more.

BlackBerry Maker To Cut Thousands More Jobs

Embattled BlackBerry maker Research In Motion is planning to slash thousands of jobs worldwide as it seeks to restructure in the wake of losses and shrinking market share, several news sources report.

According to a report in the Globe and Mail, RIM is planning to slash at least 2,000 jobs. But an unnamed source close to the company told Reuters that number could be as high as 6,000.

That’s on top of a round of layoffs last summer that saw 2,000 people lose their jobs, and it doesn’t take into account “stealth” layoffs that have reportedly been taking place at the company for some time. Junior staff have been receiving layoff notices in what has become known internally as “Goodbye Thursdays,” because the layoffs typically take place on that day, Reuters reports.

If the worst-case number is correct, RIM’s staff could be reduced to around 10,000 worldwide, down from around 18,500 as recently as last year.

The layoffs are likely to hit southwestern Ontario the hardest, as RIM’s employment is most intensely concentrated near its headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario.

The company has seen its market share slide dramatically over the past two years, as Apple’s iPhone and smartphones running the Android operating system have come to dominate the market.

The company’s troubles, which included posting a loss of 24 cents per share in the latest quarter, prompted the departure of the company’s co-CEOS, Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis. The new CEO, Thorsten Heins, said in a conference call earlier this year that he is looking to eliminate $1 billion of spending, which many took to mean more layoffs would be coming.

Although RIM remains strong in some developing countries, such as India, the company has been steadily losing market share around the world. Recent research cited by the Globe and Mail indicate the company now accounts for fewer than 7 per cent of global smartphone shipments, down from a market-leading position just a few years ago.

The company recently released details about its new BlackBerry 10, which is expected to hit the market later this year. But many analysts say it’s too late for the company to bounce back. Pipe Jaffray analyst Gene Munster told CNBC in April that RIM is going “out of business.”

Buyout rumours have swirled around the company, most recently a bizarre rumour about a $3.5-billion bid from Microsoft. Analysts, however, are increasingly saying that RIM is becoming an unattractive takeover target.

“There are not that many buyers left” for RIM, Recon Analytics analyst Roger Entner said, as quoted at the Toronto Star. “BlackBerry is running out of sugar daddies.”

Shares of RIM are hovering around $11, down from a peak of $140 in 2008.

Jason Gilbert: SIRI-OUS ACTING: Can Siri Really Do Everything In The John Malkovich Ad?

Siri, the spritely iPhone 4S assistant, has won herself a lot of celebrity friends, if Apple’s new television advertisements are any indication. Aerial snake wrangler (and noted gazpacho chef) Samuel L. Jackson appeared in a commercial with Siri, followed shortly thereafter by a spot featuring actress and human-embodiment-of-cake-frosting Zooey Deschanel. Now, actor, director and fashion designer(!) John Malkovich has become the latest famous person to hang with Siri, firing off one-word commands at his iPhone whilst lounging in a spacious room that has many leather-bound books and that, by all appearances, would seem to smell of rich, rich mahogany.

As we have with previous Siri commercials, we thought we’d put Siri to the test and try to recreate the advertisement for ourselves, just to see how well Siri works in real life. The process is simple: Everything John Malkovich says to Siri, I say to Siri on my own iPhone 4S here at The Huffington Post offices. Every take you see is a first take, because what’s the point of a voice assistant if you have to say something twice?

In our tests, we’re looking at how fast Siri goes, how accurately Siri performs, and how well Siri can understand me. Because here’s the thing: Not only are the Siri commercials the subject of two class action suits — both of which claim that Apple over-promises on Siri’s capabilities in its advertisements — now we have an article in Fortune quoting a former Apple employee saying that Steve Jobs “would have lost his mind” over Siri and that current Apple execs are “embarrassed” by the little assistant’s performance.

Aw, Apple execs! Stop being so hard on yourselves! Siri is a pretty good start, and it’s really talented at setting alarms! Also, even though people aren’t really using it that often, its very existence does seem to make people happy.

Seriously, though, Siri has indeed successfully entered the zeitgeist, and most people don’t seem to mind Siri’s so-called shortcomings: In a December survey by ChangeWave, a full 50 percent of iPhone 4S buyers said their favorite thing about their new smartphones was Siri.

But back to the ad, and the supposedly “embarrassing” Siri. Below, I test out Siri (and my John Malkovich “impression”). The result: Siri does well with the one-word commands. The voice assistant makes one mistake — it hears “true” when I say “joke” — but otherwise performance is fast and accurate.

Granted, I’m only saying one word at a time, so it’s harder for voice recognition to mess up. Siri definitely had much more trouble with the more sophisticated commands from the infamous “Rock God” commercial when we tried that out a couple of months ago.

Overall, however, Siri passes this test. See the full play-by-play below, with a special Malkovich-ian treat at the end of the video:

var src_url=”http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=577&width=570&height=351&playList=517379112&sequential=1&shuffle=0″; if (typeof(commercial_video) == “object”) { src_url += “&siteSection=”+commercial_video.site_and_category; if (commercial_video.package) { src_url += “&sponsorship=”+commercial_video.package; } } document.write(”);

How ‘Brave’ Remembers Steve Jobs

“Brave,” the upcoming animated film from Pixar, will include a special tribute to Steve Jobs in its closing credits.

According to the Wall Street Journal blog Speakeasy, an early cut of “Brave” featured a title card at the end dedicating the film to Jobs. The Apple co-founder, who was also CEO of Pixar Studios, died on Oct. 5, 2011 after a long bout with pancreatic cancer.

The Jobs tribute isn’t the only notable aspect of “Brave”: it’s the first animated film from Pixar to features a female main character — Princess Merida, a strong-willed heroine in the vein of Katniss Everdeen. It’s also the first Pixar feature with a credited female co-director: Brenda Chapman. Unfortunately, Chapman was fired from the film due to “creative differences” with the studio, this despite spending nearly eight years on the project. (Chapman used her own relationship with her daughter as inspiration for “Brave.”)

“Brave” is the first film to acknowledge Jobs’ untimely death, but the Apple mastermind’s legacy won’t fade from the cinema anytime soon. Ashton Kutcher is set to play Jobs in an upcoming film, and “Social Network” scribe Aaron Sorkin is said to be writing the script for another biopic.

For more on the Jobs tribute in “Brave,” including how it actually looks in the film, head over to WSJ.com.

“Brave” is out on June 22.

[via WSJ/Speakeasy]

Apple CEO Gives Up Whopping Dividend Income Worth Tens Of Millions

By Poornima Gupta

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Apple Inc Chief Executive Tim Cook will not be earning dividend income on the more than 1 million shares to which he is entitled, which will cost him about $75 million.

Apple said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday that Cook had asked to be excluded from a recently instituted company program through which employees can accumulate dividends on their restricted stock units that are still vesting.

Asked why Cook was doing this, Apple declined to comment beyond the filing.

Cook, who took over as chief executive from late co-founder Steve Jobs in August, has 1.125 million outstanding restricted Apple shares that are vesting over the next 10 years.

In January, Apple’s board granted Cook 1 million restricted stock units (RSUs) for running the company during Jobs’ medical leaves and as a retention tool. Half of those units are due to vest in 2016 and the remainder are due to vest in 2021.

Apple said in March that it would pay a cash dividend of $2.65 per share to its shareholders.

(Reporting By Poornima Gupta)