Tag Archives: June

LOOK: Man Appears To Point Gun At Google Street View Car

The Detroit Police Department told The Huffington Post that it’s not investigating Google Street View images that appear to show a young man pointing a gun at the camera-equipped Street View car, even though the images show the same house where Zyia Turner, a 17-month-old girl, was found dead in June.

The connection between the Street View image and the house where Zyia died appears to have first been made on July 1, days after the toddler’s death, when a user posted about it in a forum on Detroit Yes.

SCROLL DOWN FOR PHOTOS

But the image went viral after being posted to Reddit on Wednesday. In the thread, several Redditors linked to news stories about Zyia’s death and indicated the house in the Street View images looked similar to the one where Zyia was found.

CBS Detroit confirmed on Thursday that the house, which according to police is on the 18800 block of Brinker Street, is the same house where the girl’s body was recovered.

Police told The Huffington Post that it was unclear when the picture was taken, or if a crime was committed. A watermark at the bottom of the image, however, says that the photo was taken in September 2009.

A police spokesperson added that “aiming a gun at someone is considered a felonius assault,” but they “would have to have a complainant.”

Zyia was found under a pile of clothes at her grandmother’s house in June. Her grandmother had left Zyia and the girl’s two siblings in the care of an uncle while she ran errands.

According to CBS Detroit, no charges have been filed in her death.

Google had no official comment about the images.

CBS Detroit spoke to a Wayne Country Prosecutor about why this may not be a crime. Click over to find out more.

detroit street view gun 2

detroit google street view

street view gun porch

street view gun pointing

John Lundberg: A Poetry App Worth a Look (and a Listen)

I’ve been enjoying exploring The Poetry App this week — an app with a good story, which deserves the attention of any poetry fan. The app was the brainchild of Josephine Hart, who passed away in June of last year. Hart is probably best known as the author of the novel Damage (which became a major motion picture), but is perhaps best remembered as an ambassador for poetry.

Hart believed strongly in the power of the word. In her book, Catching Life By the Throat, she wrote, “Poetry has never let me down. Without poetry, I would have found life less comprehensible, less bearable and infinitely less enjoyable.” She also believed that poetry is best understood when read aloud, particularly by a skilled reader.

Acting on her beliefs, Hart founded two popular public poetry reading series — the Gallery Poets and the Josephine Hart Poetry Hour — that, for years, attracted a slew of the UK’s best-known actors. Before she passed away, Hart also laid the groundwork for the app, which she hoped would serve as an online version of those poetry readings.

Hart’s app features 115 poems by 16 poets (with plans to expand), including works by W.H. Auden, Elizabeth Bishop, Robert Browning, Lord Byron, Emily Dickinson, T.S. Eliot, Robert Frost, Rudyard Kipling, Philip Larkin, Robert Lowell, John Milton, Marianne Moore, Sylvia Plath, Christina Rossetti, Percy Bysshe Shelley and William Butler Yeats.

True to Hart’s vision, readers can study all of the app’s offerings quietly, or can call on the voice of a skilled reader. The app features a star-studded lineup, including Ralph Fiennes, Jeremy Irons, former James Bond actor Roger Moore and playwright Harold Pinter.

Readers can sift through poems by poet or by actor, and can even save their favorite poems in an in-app library. The app also includes a brief introduction to each poet written by Hart herself. In her introduction to T.S. Eliot, she quoted the Nobel academy:

“Tradition is not a dead load which we drag along with us… it is the soil in which the seeds of coming harvests are to be sown, and from which future harvests will be garnered.”

Hart hoped that the tradition she cultivated so carefully in the app would prove a fertile soil for growing future lovers of poetry.

You can download the app for free (for both the iPhone and the iPad) at the app store. If you’d like a taste of what it has to offer, the Irish Times has a link to The Wire star Dominic West reading Shelley’s “Ozymandias” here.

Joel Klein Touts News Corp. Tablet Computer Ed Venture

NEW YORK — Former New York City schools chief Joel Klein left to run News Corp.’s education division but spent much of the past year defending boss Rupert Murdoch in the phone-hacking scandal that has rocked the British media.

The investigation into the use of information taken from stolen phones is continuing, but Klein is back in New York to launch Amplify, News Corp.’s entry into the burgeoning field of digital learning.

Amplify and AT&T will fund a pilot project that will put tablet computers in students’ hands in the coming school year.

None of the schools selected to participate will have to pay for the program; profits will come down the road. Students will use the tablets at school and home, and the system will track their progress and tailor lessons to each student’s level.

“What we’re trying to do is really become a hub for serious thinking and trying to make sure that technology is a positive force,” Klein said in an interview. “Because I’ve long said that just giving a kid a computer isn’t going to change the game.”

As chancellor of New York City’s 1.1 million-pupil public school system from 2002 through the end of 2010, Klein championed policies like increasing the number of charter schools and closing schools deemed to be failing. He earlier served as assistant U.S. attorney general in charge of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division in the Clinton administration.

Klein said he has been working full-time at Amplify since mid-June after News Corp. hired general counsel Gerson Zweifach to focus on continuing fallout from the hacking scandal, which broke about six months after Klein started working at Amplify.

He would not discuss the scandal other than to say, “The company hired a world-class general counsel. I can go back full-time to something that I’m passionate about.”

Klein, 65, is from a textbook generation. He pointed to bookshelves lining his office in News Corp.’s midtown headquarters but said today’s students are less attached to the printed page.

“These kids are so used to a world of social networks and data aggregation,” Klein said.

He said digital materials can engage students in history, science and other subjects. He envisions students reading the Gettysburg Address and clicking on the words “Four score and seven years ago” to learn why Abraham Lincoln traced the nation’s birth to the Declaration of Independence. Then they might fight the Battle of Gettysburg themselves.

“If games will get them engaged in the work and excited about it, isn’t that great? If they’re educational games,” Klein said. “I don’t want them to sit there and play Minesweeper.”

Amplify will incorporate the student assessment software business Wireless Generation, which News Corp. acquired in 2010.

New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli rejected a $27 million contract with Wireless Generation to build a data system for tracking student performance last year, in part because of the phone-hacking scandal. But Klein said Wireless Generation now provides services to 3 million students in all 50 states.

Amplify joins a growing educational technology field that includes startups as well as traditional publishers like McGraw-Hill. According to investment fund GSV Capital, the number of companies that received funding to develop K-12 educational technology doubled from 2010 to 2011.

News Corp. announced Wednesday during its fourth-quarter earnings call that it will boost investment in Amplify by another $100 million from a year ago to $180 million in the coming fiscal year through next June.

The National Venture Capital Association says investment in education technology companies nationwide shot up to $429 million in 2011 from $146 million in 2002.

Betsy Corcoran, the CEO of EdSurge, which publishes a newsletter and website on educational technology, said school districts are sorting through the available products to find what works.

It may take a few years, she said. “Even though there are promising hints, we lack compelling evidence of sure-fire successes in education technology.”

Nabeel Ahmad, who teaches an educational technology course at Columbia University’s Teachers College, said Amplify’s push for tablets in the classroom seems promising, but schools may not be ready to embrace the technology.

“A good bet now is to find ways to slowly introduce it,” he said. “To go fully digital for the entire school in the way that they’re envisioning is still several years out.”

Companies selling classroom materials in the coming years will strive to align them with the Common Core, a new set of academic standards that have been adopted by 46 states and the District of Columbia.

Ann Flynn, director of educational technology for the National School Boards Association, said the Common Core makes developing new educational products much easier than if a company had to meet 50 sets of standards in 50 states. She added that News Corp.’s experience owning the social networking site Myspace could help it to develop digital learning products.

Flynn also said she didn’t expect any fallout from the hacking scandal to affect Amplify.

“The success of Wireless Generation, and its reputation with the larger education community, may have a far greater (and positive) impact on how this new endeavor is viewed than the News Corp. scandal,” Flynn said.

Some critics distrust the rush to profit from public education. “I don’t approve of for-profit ventures in education other than companies selling books and school supplies,” Diane Ravitch, New York University professor and author of “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education,” said in an email.

United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew, whose union representing 75,000 teachers often clashed with Klein when he was chancellor, said the phone-hacking scandal makes News Corp. a poor choice for the classroom.

“I don’t know how anyone with any sort of common sense would say, `Oh, yeah, let’s buy thousands of these devices and give them access to information,’” Mulgrew said.

Joel Klein Touts News Corp. Tablet Computer Ed Venture

NEW YORK — Former New York City schools chief Joel Klein left to run News Corp.’s education division but spent much of the past year defending boss Rupert Murdoch in the phone-hacking scandal that has rocked the British media.

The investigation into the use of information taken from stolen phones is continuing, but Klein is back in New York to launch Amplify, News Corp.’s entry into the burgeoning field of digital learning.

Amplify and AT&T will fund a pilot project that will put tablet computers in students’ hands in the coming school year.

None of the schools selected to participate will have to pay for the program; profits will come down the road. Students will use the tablets at school and home, and the system will track their progress and tailor lessons to each student’s level.

“What we’re trying to do is really become a hub for serious thinking and trying to make sure that technology is a positive force,” Klein said in an interview. “Because I’ve long said that just giving a kid a computer isn’t going to change the game.”

As chancellor of New York City’s 1.1 million-pupil public school system from 2002 through the end of 2010, Klein championed policies like increasing the number of charter schools and closing schools deemed to be failing. He earlier served as assistant U.S. attorney general in charge of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division in the Clinton administration.

Klein said he has been working full-time at Amplify since mid-June after News Corp. hired general counsel Gerson Zweifach to focus on continuing fallout from the hacking scandal, which broke about six months after Klein started working at Amplify.

He would not discuss the scandal other than to say, “The company hired a world-class general counsel. I can go back full-time to something that I’m passionate about.”

Klein, 65, is from a textbook generation. He pointed to bookshelves lining his office in News Corp.’s midtown headquarters but said today’s students are less attached to the printed page.

“These kids are so used to a world of social networks and data aggregation,” Klein said.

He said digital materials can engage students in history, science and other subjects. He envisions students reading the Gettysburg Address and clicking on the words “Four score and seven years ago” to learn why Abraham Lincoln traced the nation’s birth to the Declaration of Independence. Then they might fight the Battle of Gettysburg themselves.

“If games will get them engaged in the work and excited about it, isn’t that great? If they’re educational games,” Klein said. “I don’t want them to sit there and play Minesweeper.”

Amplify will incorporate the student assessment software business Wireless Generation, which News Corp. acquired in 2010.

New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli rejected a $27 million contract with Wireless Generation to build a data system for tracking student performance last year, in part because of the phone-hacking scandal. But Klein said Wireless Generation now provides services to 3 million students in all 50 states.

Amplify joins a growing educational technology field that includes startups as well as traditional publishers like McGraw-Hill. According to investment fund GSV Capital, the number of companies that received funding to develop K-12 educational technology doubled from 2010 to 2011.

News Corp. announced Wednesday during its fourth-quarter earnings call that it will boost investment in Amplify by another $100 million from a year ago to $180 million in the coming fiscal year through next June.

The National Venture Capital Association says investment in education technology companies nationwide shot up to $429 million in 2011 from $146 million in 2002.

Betsy Corcoran, the CEO of EdSurge, which publishes a newsletter and website on educational technology, said school districts are sorting through the available products to find what works.

It may take a few years, she said. “Even though there are promising hints, we lack compelling evidence of sure-fire successes in education technology.”

Nabeel Ahmad, who teaches an educational technology course at Columbia University’s Teachers College, said Amplify’s push for tablets in the classroom seems promising, but schools may not be ready to embrace the technology.

“A good bet now is to find ways to slowly introduce it,” he said. “To go fully digital for the entire school in the way that they’re envisioning is still several years out.”

Companies selling classroom materials in the coming years will strive to align them with the Common Core, a new set of academic standards that have been adopted by 46 states and the District of Columbia.

Ann Flynn, director of educational technology for the National School Boards Association, said the Common Core makes developing new educational products much easier than if a company had to meet 50 sets of standards in 50 states. She added that News Corp.’s experience owning the social networking site Myspace could help it to develop digital learning products.

Flynn also said she didn’t expect any fallout from the hacking scandal to affect Amplify.

“The success of Wireless Generation, and its reputation with the larger education community, may have a far greater (and positive) impact on how this new endeavor is viewed than the News Corp. scandal,” Flynn said.

Some critics distrust the rush to profit from public education. “I don’t approve of for-profit ventures in education other than companies selling books and school supplies,” Diane Ravitch, New York University professor and author of “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education,” said in an email.

United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew, whose union representing 75,000 teachers often clashed with Klein when he was chancellor, said the phone-hacking scandal makes News Corp. a poor choice for the classroom.

“I don’t know how anyone with any sort of common sense would say, `Oh, yeah, let’s buy thousands of these devices and give them access to information,’” Mulgrew said.

Samsung Galaxy S III Android 4.1 update rumored to occur in Q3

Samsung Galaxy S III Android 4.1 update rumored to occur in Q3

After Android 4.1 Jelly Bean was announced during Google I/O in June, one question lingered in the thoughts of Samsung Galaxy device owners: when would my device get Android 4.1? Fortunately, we have some new information regarding the Samsung Galaxy S III, Galaxy S II, Galaxy Note, and Galaxy Note II. At this point in time, the information is simply a rumor, but SamMobile claims its tipster has genuine information.

To begin, the testing for the Galaxy S III has gone the best since it is the newest device on the market with excellent hardware.  A public test version is reportedly ready to go, but awaits Google approval before it can be pushed to carriers.  The Jelly Bean update for the Galaxy S III is rumored to begin in late Q3 spilling into Q4.

The Samsung Galaxy S II is still a great phone and represents an affordable smartphone option on AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile.  With most of those devices only recently receiving Android 4.0, many are left wondering whether their device would live to see another software upgrade.  Fortunately, the Jelly Bean testing for the Galaxy S II has reportedly gone well.  There is a chance Samsung will forgo the update and provide a value pack of apps, but there is no reason to suspect this is the case.  The rumored time frame is Q4 for the Galaxy S II.

The Samsung Galaxy Note is performing well with the test build of Android 4.1 and is in the same boat as the Galaxy S II in terms of receiving Android 4.1.

The Galaxy Note II, expected to debut at Samsung’s Unpacked event later this month, is reportedly going to launch with ICS at this time, but could instead launch with Android 4.1.  However, if it launches with ICS, Samsung will update it to Android 4.1 in Q4, since it definitely will be able to handle Jelly Bean.

If we hear any official word from Samsung, we will keep you updated!  Feel free to let us know in the comment if you own a Samsung Galaxy device and if you are excited for the prospect of Jelly Bean.

[SamMobile]

China Arrests Over 10,000 In Cybercrime Crackdown

More than 10,000 suspects have been arrested and 600 criminal gangs “busted” in China’s latest cybercrime crackdown, the authorities say.

As of June, 3.2 million “harmful” messages had been deleted and 30 internet service providers punished for granting access to unlicensed sites, the Ministry of Public Security said.

Facebook Share Prices Hit Lowest Level Ever

Facebook’s stock fell 8.5 percent during the regular session Thursday, then dropped further in extended trading after the company reported quarterly earnings for the first time as a public company.

The stock has been up on 20 trading days and down on 28 since its initial public offering.

Facebook began trading publicly in mid-May following one of the most anticipated stock offerings in history. The IPO priced at $38, at the top of a projected range that Facebook had already boosted just days earlier.

Although many investors had hoped for a big first-day pop, Facebook’s stock opened on May 18 at $42.05 and fluctuated between $45 and $38 throughout the day. It closed barely above its IPO price, at $38.23.

The stock had fallen sharply in the weeks following the IPO, going as low as $25.52.

Investors have been concerned about its ability to keep increasing revenue and make money from its growing mobile audience, though many analysts hold positive long-term opinions.

The company, along with the investment banks that led the IPO, is the subject of dozens of shareholder lawsuits. They allege that analysts at the large underwriting investment banks cut their financial forecasts for Facebook just before the IPO and told only a handful of clients. Facebook and the banks overseeing the IPO insist that nothing about its IPO process was illegal or even out of the ordinary.

Here’s how Facebook’s stock has traded since the IPO:

— Friday, May 18: Closed at $38.23, up 0.6 percent from IPO price

— Monday, May 21: Closed at $34.03, down 11 percent for the day, down 10 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, May 22: Closed at $31, down 8.9 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, May 23: Closed at $32, up 3.2 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, May 24: Closed at $33.03, up 3.2 percent for the day, down 13 percent from IPO price

— Friday, May 25: Closed at $31.91, down 3.4 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, May 29: Closed at $28.84, down 9.6 percent for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, May 30: Closed at $28.19, down 2.3 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, May 31: Closed at $29.60, up 5 percent for the day, down 22 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 1: Closed at $27.72, down 6.4 percent for the day, down 27 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 4: Closed at $26.90, down 3 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 5: Closed at $25.87, down 3.8 percent for the day, down 32 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 6: Closed at $26.81, up 3.6 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 7: Closed at $26.31, down 1.9 percent for the day, down 31 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 8: Closed at $27.10, up 3 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 11: Closed at $27, down 0.4 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 12: Closed at $27.40, up 1.5 percent for the day, down 28 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 13: Closed at $27.27, down 0.5 percent for the day, down 28 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 14: Closed at $28.29, up 3.7 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 15: Closed at $30.01, up 6.1 percent for the day, down 21 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 18: Closed at $31.41, up 4.7 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 19: Closed at $31.91, up 1.6 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 20: Closed at $31.60, down 1 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 21: Closed at $31.84, up 1 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 22: Closed at $33.05, up 3.8 percent for the day, down 14 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 25: Closed at $32.06, down 3 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 26: Closed at $33.10, up 3.2 percent for the day, down 13 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 27: Closed at $32.23, down 2.6 percent for the day, down 15 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 28: Closed at $31.36, down 2.7 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 29: Closed at $31.09, down 0.9 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 2: Closed at $30.77, down 1 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 3: Closed at $31.20, up 1.4 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 5: Closed at $31.47, up 0.9 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Friday, July 6: Closed at $31.73, up 0.8 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 9: Closed at $32.17, up 1.4 percent for the day, down 15 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 10: Closed at $31.47, down 2.2 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, July 11: Closed at $30.97, down 1.6 percent for the day, down 19 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 12: Closed at $30.81, down 0.5 percent for the day, down 19 percent from IPO price

— Friday, July 13: Closed at $30.72, down 0.3 percent for the day, down 19 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 16: Closed at $28.25, down 8.1 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 17: Closed at $28.09, down 0.6 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, July 18: Closed at $29.11, up 3.6 percent for the day, down 23 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 19: Closed at $29, down 0.4 percent for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Friday, July 20: Closed at $28.76, down 0.8 percent for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 23: Closed at $28.75, down a penny for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 24: Closed at $28.45, down 1 percent for the day, down 25 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, July 25: Closed at $29.34, up 3.1 percent for the day, down 23 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 26: Closed at 26.84, down 8.5 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

Facebook Share Prices Hit Lowest Level Ever

Facebook’s stock fell 8.5 percent during the regular session Thursday, then dropped further in extended trading after the company reported quarterly earnings for the first time as a public company.

The stock has been up on 20 trading days and down on 28 since its initial public offering.

Facebook began trading publicly in mid-May following one of the most anticipated stock offerings in history. The IPO priced at $38, at the top of a projected range that Facebook had already boosted just days earlier.

Although many investors had hoped for a big first-day pop, Facebook’s stock opened on May 18 at $42.05 and fluctuated between $45 and $38 throughout the day. It closed barely above its IPO price, at $38.23.

The stock had fallen sharply in the weeks following the IPO, going as low as $25.52.

Investors have been concerned about its ability to keep increasing revenue and make money from its growing mobile audience, though many analysts hold positive long-term opinions.

The company, along with the investment banks that led the IPO, is the subject of dozens of shareholder lawsuits. They allege that analysts at the large underwriting investment banks cut their financial forecasts for Facebook just before the IPO and told only a handful of clients. Facebook and the banks overseeing the IPO insist that nothing about its IPO process was illegal or even out of the ordinary.

Here’s how Facebook’s stock has traded since the IPO:

— Friday, May 18: Closed at $38.23, up 0.6 percent from IPO price

— Monday, May 21: Closed at $34.03, down 11 percent for the day, down 10 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, May 22: Closed at $31, down 8.9 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, May 23: Closed at $32, up 3.2 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, May 24: Closed at $33.03, up 3.2 percent for the day, down 13 percent from IPO price

— Friday, May 25: Closed at $31.91, down 3.4 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, May 29: Closed at $28.84, down 9.6 percent for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, May 30: Closed at $28.19, down 2.3 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, May 31: Closed at $29.60, up 5 percent for the day, down 22 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 1: Closed at $27.72, down 6.4 percent for the day, down 27 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 4: Closed at $26.90, down 3 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 5: Closed at $25.87, down 3.8 percent for the day, down 32 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 6: Closed at $26.81, up 3.6 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 7: Closed at $26.31, down 1.9 percent for the day, down 31 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 8: Closed at $27.10, up 3 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 11: Closed at $27, down 0.4 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 12: Closed at $27.40, up 1.5 percent for the day, down 28 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 13: Closed at $27.27, down 0.5 percent for the day, down 28 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 14: Closed at $28.29, up 3.7 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 15: Closed at $30.01, up 6.1 percent for the day, down 21 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 18: Closed at $31.41, up 4.7 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 19: Closed at $31.91, up 1.6 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 20: Closed at $31.60, down 1 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 21: Closed at $31.84, up 1 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 22: Closed at $33.05, up 3.8 percent for the day, down 14 percent from IPO price

— Monday, June 25: Closed at $32.06, down 3 percent for the day, down 16 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, June 26: Closed at $33.10, up 3.2 percent for the day, down 13 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, June 27: Closed at $32.23, down 2.6 percent for the day, down 15 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, June 28: Closed at $31.36, down 2.7 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Friday, June 29: Closed at $31.09, down 0.9 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 2: Closed at $30.77, down 1 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 3: Closed at $31.20, up 1.4 percent for the day, down 18 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 5: Closed at $31.47, up 0.9 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Friday, July 6: Closed at $31.73, up 0.8 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 9: Closed at $32.17, up 1.4 percent for the day, down 15 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 10: Closed at $31.47, down 2.2 percent for the day, down 17 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, July 11: Closed at $30.97, down 1.6 percent for the day, down 19 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 12: Closed at $30.81, down 0.5 percent for the day, down 19 percent from IPO price

— Friday, July 13: Closed at $30.72, down 0.3 percent for the day, down 19 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 16: Closed at $28.25, down 8.1 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 17: Closed at $28.09, down 0.6 percent for the day, down 26 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, July 18: Closed at $29.11, up 3.6 percent for the day, down 23 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 19: Closed at $29, down 0.4 percent for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Friday, July 20: Closed at $28.76, down 0.8 percent for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Monday, July 23: Closed at $28.75, down a penny for the day, down 24 percent from IPO price

— Tuesday, July 24: Closed at $28.45, down 1 percent for the day, down 25 percent from IPO price

— Wednesday, July 25: Closed at $29.34, up 3.1 percent for the day, down 23 percent from IPO price

— Thursday, July 26: Closed at 26.84, down 8.5 percent for the day, down 29 percent from IPO price

WATCH: Sally Ride Remembered on TYT

Sally Ride was the first American woman to go to space, blasting off on the Space Shuttle Challenger on June 18, 1983, mere months before I was born. She has been an inspiration my entire life, both as a woman and a scientist. I am terribly saddened by her passing on July 23, 2012, but I hope her family and friends are comforted to know that her 17 month battle with pancreatic cancer ended peacefully.

Sally is survived by her mother, sister, niece, nephew, and her partner of 27 years, Tam O’Shaughnessy. Although friends and family knew she was gay, Sally kept her sexual orientation out of the public eye.

This week, I’ve been co-hosting the second hour of The Young Turks online with Cenk Uygur, and I wanted to take a moment to pay tribute to Sally. We also discussed the rights her partner may be refused since they were not allowed to be legally married. Please watch the video above to learn more.

Thank you, Sally. You will be missed.

See all Talk Nerdy to Me posts.
Like Cara Santa Maria on Facebook.
Follow Cara Santa Maria on Twitter.

Nintendo Lost Another $132m Last Quarter

Nintendo has announced it lost money in the second quarter of 2012 as sales of its Wii home console continued to collapse.

The games company lost about $132m (10.3bn Yen) in the quarter ending 30 June.

Its performance improved over the second quarter of 2011, when it lost a massive 37.7bn Yen.

Nintendo said it had reduced administative and general expenses following the announcement of its first-ever annual operating loss at the end of 2011.

More: Read The Full Financial Report

The company was buoyed by the news that sales of its 3DS handheld had risen from 710,000 in the second quarter of 2011 to 1.86m in 2012 – up 162% – while 3DS software sales rose 63%.

In total 19m 3DS consoles have been sold.

It added that the profitability of the 3DS has improved. It said Wii sales fell to 540,000, but that was widely expected given the consoles age and the imminent launch of the new Wii U console at the end of the year.

Google’s Still Making A Ton Of Money Despite Drop In Ad Prices

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google is getting even better at showing online ads to the right people at the right time. That enabled the Internet search leader to hit analysts’ earnings target for the second quarter and reassure investors about the company’s moneymaking prowess.

The results announced Thursday were muddled by Google’s recently completed $12.5 billion acquisition of cellphone maker Motorola Mobility Holdings and a dramatic swing in currency exchange rates that resulted in European sales converting into fewer U.S. dollars than at the same time last year.

This much is clear though: Google Inc. has refined its selection and presentation of its Internet ads in a way that is more appealing to its users.

The company, based in Mountain View, California, has accomplished it by analyzing the data that its search engine gathers about people’s interests to determine how and when to present an ad. Ideally, Google wants to show more ads when a user’s request appears driven by a desire to buy a product, book a vacation or engage in some other kind of commercial transaction.

“We’re serious about providing more intelligent results,” Susan Wojcicki, Google’s senior vice president of advertising, said Thursday during a conference call to discuss the second-quarter earnings. “We’re moving beyond a search engine that just matches strings of words to one that understands people, the world, the way people do.”

As expected, Google CEO Larry Page skipped the conference call while he recovered from an unspecified throat problem that the company revealed at its annual stockholders’ meeting last month.

Google’s search improvements appeared to pay off during the three months ending in June as the total number of clicks on Google’s ads surged 42 percent from the same time last year. That’s the highest increase since Google began to report the clicking volume on its ads four years ago.

The clicks are crucial to Google because they trigger the advertising payments that account for most of its revenue.

Google’s gains in the quarter were offset by a deepening decline in the prices that it is fetching for ads. The average price per click plunged 16 percent from last year. It marked the third consecutive quarter of year-over-year erosion in Google’s ad prices.

The trend, in part, reflects that more Web surfing is happening on smartphones and tablet computers, where the ad rates are lower than on desktop computers. The smaller screens on mobile devices also leave less space to show ads.

Google believes mobile ad rates will steadily rise as the nascent market matures and the company develops new ways to connect marketers with prospective customers, including on Internet-connected glasses that the company is testing.

Investors evidently liked what they saw in the second-quarter numbers. Google shares gained $15.94, or 2.7 percent, to $609 in Thursday’s extended trading. The stock closed Thursday’s regular session at $593.06, leaving the shares down by 8 percent so far this year. In contrast, the Dow Jones Industrial average has risen by 6 percent and the technology-driven Nasdaq composite index has climbed by 13 percent.

Some of the doubts weighing on Google’s stock center on Motorola Mobility, a troubled company whose products are less profitable than Internet advertising.

Motorola suffered an operating loss of $233 million on revenue of $1.25 billion during the final 39 days of the second quarter that Google owned the company.

As a whole, Google earned $2.8 billion, or $8.42 per share, during the three months ending in June. That compared with net income of $2.5 billion, or $7.68 per share, last year.

The earnings would have been $10.12 per share, if not for Google’s accounting costs for employee stock compensation and the Motorola deal. That figure was slightly better than the average estimate of $10.10 per share among analysts polled by FactSet.

Revenue climbed 35 percent from last year to $12.2 billion. If not for Motorola, revenue would have increased 21 percent. That would have been Google’s slowest rate of revenue growth since the fourth quarter of 2009, when the company was just starting to recover from the Great Recession.

Google’s revenue, excluding Motorola, stood at $8.36 billion after subtracting the ad commissions paid to is advertising partners. That was about $70 million below analyst projections.

The company’s slowing revenue growth stemmed primarily from the economic turmoil in Europe that has weakened currencies overseas.

Sprint 4G LTE live in a few cities – how’s it treating you?

Sprint 4G LTE live in a few cities – how’s it treating you?

Sprint fans, welcome to world of 4G. Sure, you may have been representing hard for WiMax for a while, but that’s a dead end that has peaked in many regards. Sprint is moving forward with LTE for its 4G plans, and the network has just launched in a few cities.

The 4G LTE era at Sprint officially started on July 15, though users in some cities have been reporting seeing 4G since mid June. The cities that have official support at the moment are: Atlanta, Georgia; Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio, Texas; and Kansas City, Missouri. Customers on the outskirts and surrounding areas of these markets may see coverage as well.

It’s been a little over 24 hours since the network became official, but there are reports on a few forums of people pulling down anywhere from 5 to 18 Mbps download speeds. Keep in mind that’s to be expected as the network is very young and not taxed as heavily as more mature, populated networks. We won’t know how fast – and more important, how consistent, stable, and ubiquitous – Sprint’s 4G LTE will be for quite some time. For now, it’s just good to see that the Now Network is finally underway with its LTE availability.

An LTE-compatible device is necessary to access Sprint’s new network, so only people with the HTC EVO 4G LTE, LG Viper, Samsung Galaxy Nexus, or Samsung Galaxy S III can experience LTE. Sprint will be rolling out in more markets before the close of the year, so we’ll be sure to update you as things progress.

UPDATE

Here’s the complete list of other cities that launched today

Atlanta
Athens, Ga.
Calhoun, Ga.
Carrollton, Ga.
Newnan, Ga.
Rome, Ga.
Dallas
Fort Worth, Texas
Granbury-Hood County, Texas
Houston
Huntsville, Texas
San Antonio, Texas
Waco, Texas
Kansas City, Mo.-Kan.
St. Joseph, Mo.

More Downsizing At Microsoft

Microsoft on Wednesday cut an undisclosed number of advertising jobs but tried to put a positive spin on the move.

“I can assure you we’re thinking about the exciting new opportunities that Windows 8, Xbox and Skype present for our advertising and marketing partners,” a spokeswoman told the Wall Street Journal.

The software giant’s announcement wasn’t exactly a shocker. Microsoft slashed an estimated 200 jobs last winter to streamline its marketing operations. And a report surfaced in early June that the Redmond, Wash., company was closing down its Microsoft Advertising TV Network, an ad-selling vehicle for some of NBCUniversal and Viacom’s cable networks. AdWeek reported at the time that the company had already offered severance packages to workers in that operation and was considering layoffs of 15 to 30 percent of its sales force.

In another sign of its recent struggles, Microsoft last week declared a $6.2 billion accounting charge that basically reduced the value of an online ad agency it had purchased in 2007 to nothing.

Thousands Of Wildfire Warnings Were Undelivered

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — More than 20,000 evacuation calls were never delivered to residents in the path of a wildfire that destroyed about 350 homes around Colorado Springs last month, records show.

It was the second time in five months that Colorado residents said they didn’t get calls to pack up and run as flames raced toward their homes.

Officials in El Paso and Teller counties were trying to determine why two-thirds of the 32,000 impacted residents did not receive calls during the Waldo Canyon fire that began on June 23.

Cassidian Communications, the reverse notification provider, said some calls were not completed because of heavy volume. Phone company officials said their phones were working fine at the time.

Ben Bills, spokesman for El Paso/Teller County E911, said his agency wants to know why some calls went through and others did not, and he plans meetings to discuss the problem.

Bill Simmons, who lives in Colorado Springs, said Tuesday he never got a warning call because he hasn’t registered with the city for such notifications.

Simmons said he left his home because police went through neighborhoods warning people to leave as flames neared the city. His home survived, but his neighbors lost their homes.

“Fortunately I was at home when they came by with bullhorns,” he said.

Simmons said agencies that handle emergency phone notifications should send out mail notices telling people how to register.

William and Barbara Everett died in the Waldo Canyon fire, which burned about 28 square miles.

The couple did not receive a reverse notification call to evacuate because they had no landline service or cell phone service registered with the notification system, El Paso/Teller County E911 and Colorado Springs police said.

In March, authorities in Jefferson County launched an investigation after some residents who signed up never got a warning about a fire.

About 12 percent of the people authorities intended to notify didn’t get a warning, sheriff’s spokesman Mark Techmeyer said. Some likely hung up after hearing a pause that precedes the automated message, or their phone lines may have been busy, he said.

The company that handles that system, Baton Rouge, La.-based FirstCall Network Inc., said the process worked exactly as it should have. FirstCall provides the alert service to as many as 200 agencies nationwide.

___

Thousands Of Wildfire Warnings Were Undelivered

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — More than 20,000 evacuation calls were never delivered to residents in the path of a wildfire that destroyed about 350 homes around Colorado Springs last month, records show.

It was the second time in five months that Colorado residents said they didn’t get calls to pack up and run as flames raced toward their homes.

Officials in El Paso and Teller counties were trying to determine why two-thirds of the 32,000 impacted residents did not receive calls during the Waldo Canyon fire that began on June 23.

Cassidian Communications, the reverse notification provider, said some calls were not completed because of heavy volume. Phone company officials said their phones were working fine at the time.

Ben Bills, spokesman for El Paso/Teller County E911, said his agency wants to know why some calls went through and others did not, and he plans meetings to discuss the problem.

Bill Simmons, who lives in Colorado Springs, said Tuesday he never got a warning call because he hasn’t registered with the city for such notifications.

Simmons said he left his home because police went through neighborhoods warning people to leave as flames neared the city. His home survived, but his neighbors lost their homes.

“Fortunately I was at home when they came by with bullhorns,” he said.

Simmons said agencies that handle emergency phone notifications should send out mail notices telling people how to register.

William and Barbara Everett died in the Waldo Canyon fire, which burned about 28 square miles.

The couple did not receive a reverse notification call to evacuate because they had no landline service or cell phone service registered with the notification system, El Paso/Teller County E911 and Colorado Springs police said.

In March, authorities in Jefferson County launched an investigation after some residents who signed up never got a warning about a fire.

About 12 percent of the people authorities intended to notify didn’t get a warning, sheriff’s spokesman Mark Techmeyer said. Some likely hung up after hearing a pause that precedes the automated message, or their phone lines may have been busy, he said.

The company that handles that system, Baton Rouge, La.-based FirstCall Network Inc., said the process worked exactly as it should have. FirstCall provides the alert service to as many as 200 agencies nationwide.

___

Why Russia’s Wikipedia Is Shutting Down Today

MOSCOW (AP) — Wikipedia on Tuesday shut down its Russian-language site for 24 hours to protest a bill that would give the Russian government sweeping powers to blacklist certain sites, the latest in a flurry of legislation that appears aimed at neutering a growing opposition movement that has protested President Vladimir Putin’s rule.

Lawmakers say the bill, which is to be reviewed in parliament Tuesday, is designed to protect children. Supporters say it enables the government to block sites that show child pornography, promote teen suicide, or spread information about drugs. But critics argue it gives too wide a scope for the government to subjectively select which sites to blacklist.

The Kremlin has made no public comment on the bill, but lawmakers from Putin’s party were among those who wrote the legislation, and it is likely to pass. It follows other recent laws that have targeted groups Putin views as rivals or bad influences: A law imposing heavy fines for protesters was quickly pushed through parliament in June, and a bill that would label NGOs receiving foreign aid as “foreign agents” was approved just last week.

Russia’s Internet has until now been relatively unrestrained by government restrictions or firewalls. While anti-government activists or media have often been the victims of hacking attempts in recent years, the government has largely left the Internet an unregulated space for political discussion.

So the new bill has provoked a flurry of protest online, with many expressing support for Wikipedia’s actions. Three of the top Twitter hash tags in Russia on Tuesday were “RuWikiBlackout,” ”Wikipedia,” and “Law No. 89417-6,” all of which refer to the legislation.

Human rights activists and opposition leaders also loudly criticized the bill. The Presidential Council of Human Rights urged parliament not to pass the legislation in its current state.

Others were more skeptical about the actual restrictive power of the law, asserting that it was designed to test the Russian public’s reaction and serve as a warning against anti-government activity online.

Anton Nossik, media director of Internet holding company SUP, which runs Russia’s most popular blogging platform, wrote that there “won’t be any immediate consequences if this law is passed.”

But, he added, “the reality is that they are testing to see how to adopt such measures in the future … For the past 12 years I was sure that the Russian government was smart enough not to censor the Internet. Now they are scattering any doubt that Russia is on the path of government regulation that is senseless and ruthless,” he wrote.

Alexei Navalny, an opposition leader and anti-corruption blogger, wrote in his blog that the legislation underscored the Kremlin’s desperation to win over an Internet-savvy public. According to Navalny, the legislation is yet another attempt by the government to win the “ideological struggle on the Internet.”

Russians in large cities have become accustomed to unfettered access to the Internet. In an AP-GfK poll released in June, only 10 percent of those polled in Moscow said they did not use the internet. Internet use throughout the country is on the rise, with 38 percent of Russians now using the Internet daily, up from 22 percent just two years ago, according to The Public Opinion Foundation.

Wikipedia’s Russian-language site encouraged users to spread the word about the law and contact their representatives in parliament to lobby against it. The protest comes after a similar shutdown of the English-language site in January to protest the anti-pirating Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. Congress.

Why Russia’s Wikipedia Is Shutting Down Today

MOSCOW (AP) — Wikipedia on Tuesday shut down its Russian-language site for 24 hours to protest a bill that would give the Russian government sweeping powers to blacklist certain sites, the latest in a flurry of legislation that appears aimed at neutering a growing opposition movement that has protested President Vladimir Putin’s rule.

Lawmakers say the bill, which is to be reviewed in parliament Tuesday, is designed to protect children. Supporters say it enables the government to block sites that show child pornography, promote teen suicide, or spread information about drugs. But critics argue it gives too wide a scope for the government to subjectively select which sites to blacklist.

The Kremlin has made no public comment on the bill, but lawmakers from Putin’s party were among those who wrote the legislation, and it is likely to pass. It follows other recent laws that have targeted groups Putin views as rivals or bad influences: A law imposing heavy fines for protesters was quickly pushed through parliament in June, and a bill that would label NGOs receiving foreign aid as “foreign agents” was approved just last week.

Russia’s Internet has until now been relatively unrestrained by government restrictions or firewalls. While anti-government activists or media have often been the victims of hacking attempts in recent years, the government has largely left the Internet an unregulated space for political discussion.

So the new bill has provoked a flurry of protest online, with many expressing support for Wikipedia’s actions. Three of the top Twitter hash tags in Russia on Tuesday were “RuWikiBlackout,” ”Wikipedia,” and “Law No. 89417-6,” all of which refer to the legislation.

Human rights activists and opposition leaders also loudly criticized the bill. The Presidential Council of Human Rights urged parliament not to pass the legislation in its current state.

Others were more skeptical about the actual restrictive power of the law, asserting that it was designed to test the Russian public’s reaction and serve as a warning against anti-government activity online.

Anton Nossik, media director of Internet holding company SUP, which runs Russia’s most popular blogging platform, wrote that there “won’t be any immediate consequences if this law is passed.”

But, he added, “the reality is that they are testing to see how to adopt such measures in the future … For the past 12 years I was sure that the Russian government was smart enough not to censor the Internet. Now they are scattering any doubt that Russia is on the path of government regulation that is senseless and ruthless,” he wrote.

Alexei Navalny, an opposition leader and anti-corruption blogger, wrote in his blog that the legislation underscored the Kremlin’s desperation to win over an Internet-savvy public. According to Navalny, the legislation is yet another attempt by the government to win the “ideological struggle on the Internet.”

Russians in large cities have become accustomed to unfettered access to the Internet. In an AP-GfK poll released in June, only 10 percent of those polled in Moscow said they did not use the internet. Internet use throughout the country is on the rise, with 38 percent of Russians now using the Internet daily, up from 22 percent just two years ago, according to The Public Opinion Foundation.

Wikipedia’s Russian-language site encouraged users to spread the word about the law and contact their representatives in parliament to lobby against it. The protest comes after a similar shutdown of the English-language site in January to protest the anti-pirating Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. Congress.

Police Use Google To Nab Fugitive Wanted In 2010 Double Homicide

The Chicago Police Department are partially crediting their use of a simple Google search in nabbing a double-homicide suspect from New York who had avoided authorities for two years by dressing as a woman.

Ronnell Jones, 24, of Brooklyn, N.Y., was pulled over in a traffic stop on Western Avenue in Chicago on June 10 and subsequently arrested on alcohol and weapons charges and taken into police custody, ABC Chicago reports.

After police Googled Jones’ name, they discovered that the man had quite the back story: He was featured on an “America’s Most Wanted” episode in March as a suspect in a 2010 gang-related double murder in Yonkers, N.Y., according to the Associated Press.

A fingerprint analysis confirmed that Jones, who did not initially offer up his true identity, was wanted in the double homicide.

“We use it just like everyone else,” CPD Gang Enforcement Commander Kevin Ryan told the AP of the officers’ use of Google in Jones’ arrest.

As Jones has no criminal history in Chicago, he would have likely been released had officers not connected the dots of the man’s story, according to Fox Chicago.

Jones was depicted on “America’s Most Wanted” as wearing women’s wigs and large diamond earrings to avoid being taken into police custody in the murders of Kasheem Little and Carlton McLeod.

WATCH Yonkers, N.Y. police announce the capture of Ronnell Jones in Chicago: