Tag Archives: technology

Rosina Samadani: Hope Springs for Women Entrepreneurs in Healthcare

I walked into the Soho-based offices of Blueprint Health, a co-work space and accelerator for the healthcare technology companies, last month to meet with one of their interns. The office is a dynamic, somewhat noisy loft space with the normal activity you’d expect in any open work environment. A meeting occurring over there between three animated people, a demo going on over here with another two people hunched over a screen while a third mans the controls, others strolling around seemingly having conversations with themselves, but in reality, engaged in some intense conversation via their mobile phone’s headset.

After about a 45-minute stint in our own intense conversation, I noticed something. There wasn’t a woman in sight, other than myself. All the people in meetings, working away at their desks, conversing on their headsets, were men. Here I was, in mid-2012, in a NYC-based gathering place for healthcare-focused startups, and of the 40 or so people I’d seen or encountered… not a single female. I got back to my desk and out of curiosity visited the Blueprint Health website. I wanted to learn more this odd place that I had visited. Scanning through all the photos, I saw one woman among several dozen men.

Perhaps most people wouldn’t find this odd. After all, this is a work space for technology startups, two domains that do not necessarily have a natural proclivity for attracting women. However, this is also a healthcare startup space, and the healthcare industry has a healthy percentage of women in its ranks — across hospitals, payers, and industry players. Entering classes at medical schools hover around 50 percent women, according to the American Association of Medical Colleges. In 2005 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported that the percent of women in Pharmaceutical and Medical Manufacturing was close to equal at 48.8 percent vs. 52.1 percent male. (This does change when one looks at higher-ranking positions, where the percent of women decreases to 36.4 percent, and even more so if one looks at minority women, who only comprise 7.2% percent.) Even taking healthcare out of the analysis and looking at data on women in science and engineering, the NY Times in an article published on February 23, 2012, cited the Census Bureau’s annual Current Population Survey, stating that “Among college graduates 65 or older, only 23 percent of those with degrees in science or engineering majors are women; among people 40 to 64, the proportion of women rises to 36 percent; among those 25 to 39, 45.9 percent are women.” The argument could be made that there should be a better representation of women than I had witnessed that afternoon, i.e., that it was, indeed, odd.

Following that experience, I decided to talk to a few women in the healthcare startup ecosystem — three entrepreneurs in healthcare accelerator programs and the Chief Evangelist at health tech incubator Rock Health. Despite the odd dearth of women in the loft that day, these women give me hope for women entrepreneurs in healthcare.

Catherine Montgomery is in Blueprint Health’s current accelerator group of nine companies. Her company, daisyBill, is co-founded with Sarah Moray. They are the only women in the Blueprint’s group of 23 founders. Ms. Montgomery owned a medical billing company for nine years and founded daisyBill, a workers’ compensation billing company, last year. It is in beta currently and will be launching on October 18th, timed to take advantage of the California law requiring workers compensation claims to be submitted electronically.

Startup Health is an accelerator focused on healthcare technology startups, based in New York. One of the ten companies in its inaugural group has a female founder and another has a female on its founding team. Bronwyn Spira is the founder of FORCE Therapeutics, which has created a physical therapy app by which patients can view exercises, and progress is tracked via visually appealing charts. She describes the development as an “evangelical move” for her field because in her opinion physical therapists are not very tech-savvy. They launch their iPad and iPhone apps in a few months.

Cora Scott is part of the husband-and-wife team that started Brainpaint, a software program that has automated evidence-based protocols to provide Electroencephalography (EEG) feedback to participants in real time. The core to their technology is that the brain can be trained to change a person’s behavior, for example with ADD or addiction. They are currently being used at a handful of institutions and are building their case.

(The next group of entrepreneurs entering Startup Health were just announced. The group has three female founders, including this author.)

Leslie Ziegler is Chief Evangelist (love the title) of Rock Health and is one of the six women behind the hip health-tech accelerator that officially began in 2010. Rock Health, the brainchild of Halle Tecco, has a noticeably better ratio of women to men than other health tech accelerators and incubators, perhaps in part due to its all female management team. Five of the thirteen teams in its current group in Silicon Valley are women-led (only one of the seven founders in its Boston group is a woman, reflecting a different set of attitudes on the east coast). Rock Health has also started, as Ms. Ziegler calls it, a “monthly dinner that is now really a movement,” xxinhealth, a group of women at the intersection of entrepreneurship and healthcare.

I asked these entrepreneurs why they thought there were so few women in these programs. They, as I, didn’t understand it — or perhaps don’t care to think about it too deeply as the reasons are unnerving in these times. Claire Cain Miller for the New York Times wrote on July 18, 2012 that in the technology startup ecosystem, “There remain distressingly few women… for reasons including the tech industry’s girl-repelling image problem, the tiny number of powerful women role models and the insular Silicon Valley deal-making boys’ club.” With a lack of role models, women need to be a little bolder than the average entrepreneur. Catherine Montgomery of daisyBill has two daughters, one of whom is a computer science major at NYU, and hopes that other parents like herself will “raise women to be bold in this field, to take steps forward without inhibitions.”

There is a great opportunity for the healthcare startup ecosystem to be a role model for other industries. Just as Ms. Miller argues in the aforementioned article that “With some effort, [the Valley] could become a model for other places,” so does the healthcare startup ecosystem have an opportunity to be a role model for other industry verticals — with its representation of women. Healthcare is an industry where women are reasonably well represented in established companies. It can also be an industry where women entrepreneurs thrive.

To that end — or really I prefer to say beginning — I’d like to suggest three things that could be done to mitigate the odd dearth of women entrepreneurs in healthcare:

1. Select outward. The next time you’re in a position to make a decision about who will fill a seat, take a look at the type of person who has never filled this seat before. Look sideways for a different type of face. For example, wouldn’t it be great to have a woman as the next Health and Human Services Chief Technology Officer? Role models matter. All else being equal, for this and other key roles, let’s encourage/suggest/nominate the selection of a woman.

2. Connect. The next time you see an effort to make women more visible, think about the next practical step needed to help that effort stick. For example, let’s connect the women who answered Dave McClure’s (a San Francisco-based entrepreneur and angel investor, who founded and runs the incubator 500 Startups) issued a Challenge on July 18th on TechCrunch to make three investments of $5,000 or more to a female founder of a startup. The Challenge site is difficult to find even if you try to Google it. I’d love to see a link to it front and center on the AngelList’s home page and have it easy to search the site for female founders.

3. Notice. This requires the least amount of effort but could have the greatest effect. If you do one thing, this is the one I ask of you. The next time you’re listening to a panel, attending a conference, walking into an incubator space, browsing a website (maybe even your own website), take a moment and notice if it feels diverse. There isn’t necessarily a need to dwell on it too much, to raise a cry right then and there, to take a stand at the expense of working with an organization or a group, but noticing it is fundamental, will become second nature, will acknowledge the oddness at a personal level — and that is the first step to a meaningful change.

Silicon Valley Vet: This Is How You Grow

A startup is a company designed to grow fast. Being newly founded does not in itself make a company a startup. Nor is it necessary for a startup to work on technology, or take venture funding, or have some sort of “exit.” The only essential thing is growth. Everything else we associate with startups follows from growth.

If you want to start one it’s important to understand that. Startups are so hard that you can’t be pointed off to the side and hope to succeed. You have to know that growth is what you’re after. The good news is, if you get growth, everything else tends to fall into place. Which means you can use growth like a compass to make almost every decision you face.

Silicon Valley Vet: This Is How You Grow

A startup is a company designed to grow fast. Being newly founded does not in itself make a company a startup. Nor is it necessary for a startup to work on technology, or take venture funding, or have some sort of “exit.” The only essential thing is growth. Everything else we associate with startups follows from growth.

If you want to start one it’s important to understand that. Startups are so hard that you can’t be pointed off to the side and hope to succeed. You have to know that growth is what you’re after. The good news is, if you get growth, everything else tends to fall into place. Which means you can use growth like a compass to make almost every decision you face.

The Wearable, Automatic Camera Designed To Capture Your ‘Hidden’ Life

A new automatic, wearable camera is promising to “change the way we think about photography” – and potentially privacy – by taking the photographer out of the process.

The Autographer is a hands-free, digital camera that automatically takes thousands of photographs a day and stores them for review on a smartphone app.

Designed to be worn constantly, the camera takes pictures as a user goes through their daily lives – however ordinary or extraordinary.

It will cost £399 when released for sale in November.

Housed in a relatively small, discreet black case, the camera is designed to be worn on a necklace lanyard, or on the strap of a bag.

It has five on-board sensors to detect changes in temperature, light, motion, direction and colour, and uses those cues to take shots with its wide-angle lens.

The camera has a 136-degree field of view, meaning it can capture more of a scene than a typical camera phone.

It also features 8GB of memory and takes 5-megapixel images, allowing it to store many days’ worth of pictures.

Thanks to a Bluetooth chip on board the device can interact with your smartphone via a bespoke app, letting users manage their photos, export video files and GIFs and delete specific images if an unwitting subject objects.

OMG Life, who announced the device on Monday, said users would be able to “watch their ‘unseen’ moments unfold through natural, unpredictable images”. It said the images and videos revealed by the camera would show “a surprising new take on their world”.

The idea emerged from similar devices used to help the treatment of Alzheimer’s and dementia, OMG said.

OMG said those devices, based on Microsoft’s SenseCam technology, have proven popular as a way to help sufferers of those illnesses manage their daily lives and cope with the trauma of impaired memory.

The Autographer is an all-new consumer device, however, which OMG is pitching at artists and creatives who want to capture images in new and unpredictable ways.

autographer

The camera has been designed with a bright, yellow ring around the lens, intended to let you know if someone wearing an Autographer has it turned on or off.

Ideas such as wearing one to a festival or one a night out have been pitched as potential uses – but OMG is hoping to be surprised by the creative ways early adopters find to use one.

Simon Randall, managing director of OMG Life, told the Huffington Post UK that he is are aware some people may not want to be part of the wearer’s experiment, but is confident it will attract the “creatives” and “image makers” prepared to adopt the new technology early.

Michael B. Fishbein: The Future of Venture Capital (Part 2)

My last post was about some recent trends in the venture capital industry and my predictions about how it will change. In this post I wanted to highlight three companies taking a new approach to starting and funding technology startups: Betaworks, Casual Corp, and Innovation Endeavours.

The underlying themes are 1) the view of a startup as a search for a repeatable and scalable business and a focus on top-notch teams who can execute that search istead of a focus on ideas, 2) a focus on a designed and repeatable process for searching and scaling, 3) providing more than just financing — young entrepreneurs need operating expertise and education (and not a business school education!) as well as a community of people who can help, and 4) investing outside of the common venture capital criteria — identifying under-funded opportunities where valuations are more appropriate.

Betaworks

Betaworks is a hybrid investment fund and incubator. According to their website, “We are not a fund and we are not an incubator; we are betaworks. We are makers. Creating companies, scaling germs of ideas, crafting the future of the social web.”

Investments have included OMGPop, GroupMe and Groupon. The company recently acquired deeply distressed, Digg. Once valued at over $160 million, Betaworks acquired it at a price of about $500,000 with the objective of a turnaround. Bitly was started within Betaworks out of a need that their companies had. Bitly recently raised $15 million funding.

John Borthwick, Founder and CEO of Betworks described its unique approach: “The venture capital structure is banking on finding that one super-duper winner, and there’s nothing wrong with that, But our goal is to create a network of companies with lots of connections between them that increases the likelihood of success between all of them.”

Casual Corp

Casual Corp is a social product studio that builds companies out of a series of “little bets” and rapid iteration.

“We use our expertise of driving social engagement at scale along with a shared technology platform and repeatable product development patterns to validate new product concepts very rapidly.” – Thor Ernstsson, Founder of Casual Corp

Once a concept is demonstrably viable and a path to scale is validated, independent resources and management team grow it as a company separate from Casual Corp.

Products are developed internally via Casual Corp’s Entrepreneur in Residence program and through co-development partnerships with Fortune 500 companies. We enable corporate and aspirational entrepreneurs to leverage the Casual model and platform to identify and solve a problem.

The first generation of products on the Casual platform are Send Your Best, Mogo, Momental, and Giftorious, with more in development.

Innovation Endeavours

Founded in 2010 by Google Chairman Eric Schmidt and Dror Berman, Innovation Endeavors invests in and supports companies at the earliest stage. Runway Program is a nine-month “venture creation” program. “Runway is pre-team and pre-idea. We lower the barrier to high-impact entrepreneurship by helping you form a multi-disciplinary team and giving you a structured exploration process to challenge existing business models, discover future market needs, and prototype solutions in areas of your choice.”

When teams start the Runway Program, they go through a three-week kick-off focused on building a solid process and team foundation. They then incorporate their company and Innovation Endeavors invests in them with a convertible note.

More

Additional companies to check out include Science Inc, Soho Tech Labs, and 500 Startups and K2 Media Labs (as described in part 1).

Apple Loses Patent Case Against Android Rivals

FRANKFURT (Reuters) – A German court ruled against Apple Inc in two patent cases against Samsung Electronics and Motorola Mobility, owned by Google.

The Mannheim court ruled that Samsung and Motorola didn’t infringe a technology related to touch-screen functions.

The ruling came as customers queued at Apple stores across the world to buy the new version of the company’s iPhone.

The touch-screen technology is used in a number of applications running on Google’s mobile platform Android. Industry analysts had feared a ruling in favor of Apple could have a wider impact on the smartphone industry.

Samsung said in a statement it welcomed the ruling, while Apple declined to comment.

Motorola could not immediately reached for comment.

Last month Apple scored a landmark legal victory over Samsung when a U.S. jury found the Korean company had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

Technology companies have invested billions of dollars in buying up patent portfolios that they can use against rivals and have also ploughed money into litigation in the United States and Europe.

Germany has become a major battleground in the global patent war between makers of mobile phones, tablet computer devices and their operating software, as court actions there have proved to be relatively cheap and speedier than in other jurisdictions.

Last week a court in Munich ruled that Motorola had infringed Apple’s “overscroll bounce” technology patent, which enables users to move documents over the screen of their device and let them bounce back to the center after releasing their fingers.

(Reporting by Harro ten Wolde in Frankfurt; Additional reporting by Miyoung Kim in Seoul; Editing by David Holmes)

New Military Binoculars Can See Brainwaves

If we were to pick the hottest area of technology research so far in 2012, it would have to be brainwaves. We’ve already seen them being used to move robotic exoskeletons for stroke victims and pilot drone aircraft, and their applications just keep evolving. Case in point: A new battlefield binocular system that will let soldiers determine hostile activity from miles away by using their subconscious thoughts in conjunction with a computer.

Rabbi Laura Baum: iPhone 5, I-It And I-Thou

Tishrei is the month in the Jewish calendar that has more holidays than any other: Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkot and Simchat Torah are the main ones. But in this Tishrei of the new year 5773, there is an additional holiday. It’s a day that many people around the world are looking forward to, including me. On the 5th of Tishrei, corresponding to Sept. 21, there will be a special day which I’ve dubbed Yom Release of the Apple iPhone 5.

I love technology and am looking forward to my iPhone upgrade. Recent studies show that most young adults feel happier when they travel with their electronic devices, and more people worry about losing their mobile computing devices than their wedding rings.

Technology is an amazing tool. But there are also concerns about technology. There are those who worry that young people today will not have the long-lost skills of making eye contact or writing in full sentences (and without emoticons). Concerns about technology are not new. There were people in previous generations who worried that their latest technologies, whether the alphabet, the printing press or the television, would erode people’s ability to speak and/or think.

Long before there were iPads or iPhones, and even before there were iPods and iTunes, there was something called I-It and I-Thou. These were two different types of relationships, as described by philosopher Martin Buber in his 1923 book.

An I-It relationship is not a transformative or deep relationship. I-It often describes a relationship between a person and an object, but it can also occur between two people. In these interactions, the “it” generally doesn’t make us feel bad, doesn’t criticize us and doesn’t interrupt us. But that also means the “it” cannot hold our hand when we are sick, help us when we are frail or comfort us when we cry.

Those kinds of relationships require what Buber calls an I-Thou relationship. Rather than an objectified “it,” there’s a living connection, openness and honesty. This is a deeper and more transformative type of relationship in which a person is willing to do something for another with no expectation of receiving something in return.

This framework of I-It and I-Thou is useful in thinking about how we approach many parts of our lives, including technology. We cannot have a deep I-Thou relationship with our espresso machines, our television sets or even an iPhone 5. Even if we sometimes become so enamored with our technology that we treat it as a “thou,” we must not expect the technology to “thou” us back.

Fears about technology often go hand in hand with a concern that we’re focused too much on things (the “its” of life), and not enough on ourselves and each other (the “thous”). Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, writing in 1951, expressed concern that people were too focused on “technical civilization” and therefore might miss out on appreciating the splendor of other experiences and relationships. He wrote that “things are the shore, the voyage is in time.”

The Jewish New Year gives us the opportunity to focus not just on the shore, but also on the voyage. The holiday reminds us to not just be distracted by what gives us instant gratification, but to consider what really matters to us.

When technology helps us have better I-Thou relationships, it’s a phenomenal tool. I’ve seen the power of using technology to build a global online Jewish community. At OurJewishCommunity.org, tens of thousands of people from dozens of countries tune in for streaming High Holiday services. Each Shabbat, people from around the world participate in a video-streamed Shabbat experience and join the conversation by chatting in via computer. Here, technology is not used for its own sake but rather as a means to building an evolving and dynamic Jewish community.

In moments where I am able to celebrate Judaism with people from around the world, I see the value in technology. When I watch my young nephews who live several hundred miles away from me blow out their birthday candles on Skype, I see the value in technology. When I am able to keep in touch with friends I haven’t seen in years on Facebook, I see the value in technology. In these types of examples, technology allows for better I-Thou relationships in our lives.

At other times, though, we may be hiding our noses in technology and avoiding deeper relationships. While technology enhances our lives in so many ways, there are also times to put it down so that we can be fully present in other areas of our lives.

Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are about being fully present. They are holidays built into the yearly cycle that give us an opportunity to reflect on the year just ending and the year ahead. We do the difficult work of focusing on ourselves, so that we can then have better relationships and be more present for ourselves and others.

Among my wishes for the New Year is that we can strive to find focus throughout the year. When technology helps us be present and connect to others, it’s a wonderful tool. But we also must be mindful of when we’re using technology simply for its own sake and evaluate whether it is standing in the way of deeper connections.

And, yes, my other wish is for a new iPhone 5!

Please join us throughout the Jewish High Holidays, on the HuffPost Religion live-blog, updated daily with spiritual reflections, blogs, photos, videos and verses. Tell us your story.

Teresa Rodriguez Williamson: Zuckerberg, Chef Mina and Vegan Porcini Ragout

What do you get when you add the power and passion of a woman like Randi Zuckerberg (yes, the Facebook family) with the creativity and innovation of famed Chef Michael Mina? You get one of the most dynamic dinner parties in Silicon Valley. Invited to this special event were titans of technology and social media mavens. I’m still not sure how I ended up on the VIP list.

Randi hosted 25 really smart people at her Creative Lounge event. Among the guest were a few of her college buddies who helped launch Facebook. My favorite conversation of the night:

Me: “What do you mean this new app is your pet project?”
He: “Well, I helped build Facebook. I don’t need to sell another app.”

Got it.

The dinner was a social experiment created by Randi for her latest endeavor on Facebook called The Creative Lounge. She is bringing together the greatest minds of Hollywood, technology, and media and letting the magic flow, while giving access to anyone on facebook to comment, post questions, and interact with the event in real time.

2012-09-17-RandiandMinacuttingbeef.jpg

First, Chef Mina showed us how to make Hay-Smoked Ribeye. He spoke about the “tasting” being the key to cooking: “Understand what you are tasting, think about balance. The four flavors that need to be balanced are acid, sweetness, spice and fat.”

2012-09-17-2012082919.14.12.jpg

The goal of the event was to inspire, educate, and create new relationships. What I found fascinating in how Randi Zuckerberg has created a space that is both intimate as well as accessible to everyone in the world who has a smart phone or computer. So often, the giants of innovation cut themselves off from the rest of the world and create myopic bubbles where they safely play with their cohorts. At these Creative Lounges, people are invited to ask, share, comment, and join the conversation. True, the dinner was uber private and very intimidating to a rookie like me. But it was pretty cool watching the questions come in and see how technology is bridging the gap between our celebrity social icons and the general population.

2012-09-17-saladandwine.jpg

Guests were encouraged to tweet, blog, and Instagram their photos of the night. Questions for Chef Mina came in from around the world. I got a question from one of my Twitter followers @flySolo from India. He wanted to know if Michael Mina created vegan dishes. The answer is yes, and here, Chef Mina shares his recipe for Porcini Ragout on Whipped Polenta. Enjoy!

2012-09-17-20120905MINAPolentawithMushroomRagoutlg2.jpg

Porcini Stock

Ingredients:

1 pint Madeira cooking wine
5 quarts Water
2 Bay leaves
20 Thyme sprigs
1 whole garlic head, split
2 White onions
2 lbs. Mushroom buttons
½ lbs. Dried Porcini mushrooms

Method of Preparation

1. Take half of the dried porcinis and steep them in the water that has been heated up to 180F for 20 minutes. Reserve the water and porcini’s separately for later use.
2. In a 350F oven, roast the button mushrooms until golden brown around 30 minutes. Make sure they are not over crowded on the sheet tray.
3. In a stock pot sweat out the onion, garlic, thyme, bay and button mushrooms until the mushrooms are tender.
4. Add in the other half of the dried porcini’s and turn up the heat. Cook until there is some caramelization forms on the bottom of the pot.
5. Deglaze with the Madeira and reduce 95 percent of the way.
6. Cover with the reserved porcini water and bring to a simmer. Let simmer for 40 min.
7. Strain, cool and reserve

Porcini Ragout

Ingredients:

1 lbs. Porcini, fresh, small diced
1 oz Kuzu starch
2 Bay leaves
25 Sprigs thyme
2 lbs Cremini, mushrooms, small diced
1 pint Madeira
8 Medium shallots, diced small
1 Large onion, white, small diced
1 Cup rehydrated porcini, small dice
3 Quarts Porcini stock

Method of Preparation

1. Sear the mushrooms in oil, a little at a time to get a good sear on them. Strain off any excess fat and reserve.
2. In a large pot, cook off the onions, shallots, and the thyme and bay and the reserved porcinis from the porcini stock. Cook on high to caramelize well. The thyme and bay should be tied together with butchers twine so they can be removed once done cooking.
3. At that point add the mushrooms and stir well, then deglaze with the Madeira and reduce 95 percent of the way.
4. Add the porcini stock and bring to a simmer.
5. Remove a little of the cooking liquid and mix it with the kuzu starch and then pour that back in to the pot and cook for another 10 minutes stirring well.
6. Remove the thyme and bay, and it is ready to serve.

Vegetable Stock

Ingredients:

1 Large white onion, diced
1 Tablespoon black peppercorn
3 Bay leaves
4.5 Quarts cold water
3 Garlic cloves crushed
1 Large tomato, diced
1 Large Turnip, diced
1 Large carrot, diced
3 Stalks Celery, diced
1 Medium Leek, diced
20 Thyme sprigs

Method of Preparation:

1. In a large pot add all vegetables and the water.
2. Bring to a boil and skim any impurities from the top of the pot, then turn down to a slow simmer.
3. Simmer for one hour and then strain.

Whipped Polenta

Ingredients:

1 Quart Polenta, fine
5 quarts Vegetable stock
Salt to taste
Pepper to taste

Method of Preparation:

1. Bring vegetable stock to a simmer in a large pot and stir in the polenta.
2. Season with salt and let cook (stirring often) until the polenta is very tender about 25 to 30 minutes on a low heat, being sure not to let the bottom burn.
3. Remove from pot and start to blend in a vita prep, while still very hot, until smooth.
4. Pass through a chinois.
5. While still hot put contents in a ISI gun(Whipped Cream NO-charged gun) and charge with 2 chargers. Make sure to test the ISI before use.

Your Burning ‘Revolution’ Questions Answered

After watching the first episode of “Revolution,” you may have questions. With any luck, some of those questions are answered in this interview with the show’s executive producer and showrunner, Eric Kripke.

“Revolution,” which also counts J.J. Abrams and “Iron Man” director Jon Favreau among its executive producers, takes place 15 years into the future, in a world in which all electricity — anything that can throw a spark or carry a charge — doesn’t work any more. The country has been taken over by various factions and militias, and in Monday’s premiere, the Matheson family was torn apart by Captain Neville (Giancarlo Esposito), a high-ranking officer doing the bidding of those running the Monroe Republic.

According to the producers, we’ll see flashbacks to the early days of the blackout in upcoming episodes, and Esposito, who talked about playing Neville in a recent interview, says viewers will learn more about the hardscrabble lives of average citizens and the “world of ease” occupied by high-ranking Monroe Republic officials. Fellow cast member Elizabeth Mitchell promised lots of “swashbucking sword action” in this interview.

But the ultimate task of the show’s writers, according to Kripke, is to flesh out and develop the show’s main characters, which include Charlie Matheson (Tracy Spiridakos), her ex-Marine uncle Miles (Billy Burke), her kidnapped brother Danny (Graham Rogers) and other survivors, including the nerdy Aaron (Zak Orth) and the mysterious Nora (Daniella Alonso).

Deepening the characters is an excellent — and necessary — goal, but it’s one that sometimes conflicts with the overall goal of most broadcast networks, as viewers have often seen on genre dramas. (Networks usually want to give viewers unambiguous characters to root for.) As I noted in my conflicted “Revolution” review, the show’s premise is alluring, but the networks have created so many failures in the sci-fi arena in recent years that it’s hard not to feel gun-shy about this latest “what if” venture.

So how dark can “Revolution” and its characters get? It is, after all, set in a post-apocalypse America, in which we see entire cities that have emptied out thanks to the violence and chaos that engulfed the nation after the blackout. But NBC clearly doesn’t want another “Walking Dead,” despite the AMC show’s hit status. Judging by the “Revolution” pilot and the remarks the show’s producers have made to the press, the network wants a much more hopeful tale, one in which the good guys go on a heroic quest and chalk up a bunch of wins in the course of an epic road trip.

Kripke has some experience in this arena, having created and run “Supernatural,” the tale of road-tripping brothers on a long-term quest to fight many different varieties of evil. Fans of that show know how consistently Kripke created believably complex emotional stakes and suspenseful scenarios for the Winchester brothers — all on a CW budget.

But “Revolution,” an ensemble drama, is a different animal, and CW ratings won’t fly on NBC. In the interview below (which assumes you have seen the “Revolution” pilot so spoiler-phobes, beware), Kripke talks about what “Supernatural” skills are transferable to this new drama, the mistakes other shows have made in the high-concept arena and what he sees as the show’s ultimate goals.

The broadcast networks keep trying to do these ensemble shows with genre elements and overarching mythologies, and these are obviously shows that the networks want to be broad hits. I feel like there are a lot of things in these two kinds of shows — a compelling mythology-driven drama and a broadly accessible hit — that are in conflict. You know, the fans might want the dark, scary scenarios, but I can see networks getting nervous about anything too pessimistic. That might be why those shows usually last only one or two seasons — a bunch of different shows in the past few years have had trouble balancing those conflicting agendas. How is your show going to do that?
There’s no question that the landscape is littered with genre ensemble shows that didn’t work, and I also realize that people have loved and lost so many times that they’re growing skeptical. What you hope for and what I’m confident that we’ll have is the right combination of ingredients, and letting it come from a coherent voice with a coherent vision. I like to think that’s what I’m providing. I feel like one, I learned a lot from those shows in terms of the potholes that they hit, and two, I also have my own take on the type of show I want to make.

I think some of those shows were far more focused on the concept than on the characters. One of the reasons I wanted to be in business with [J.J. Abrams' production company] Bad Robot is because “Lost” is the gold standard of genre ensemble storytelling. I was a huge fan of “Lost,” and I was interested in the island, up to a point. I wanted to know why they were there or what was going on, but I was far more taken with those characters and how they were going to interact in that environment.

For me, moving forward with this series, it’s character first. I’m not going to short-shrift the mystery, but my emphasis is not on the mystery, my emphasis is on these characters, and the journey they’re having as they’re struggling to reunite their family and eventually battle against this dictator. That’s why the show’s called “Revolution.” So [the idea is to] focus on the characters and hope that the genre concept at the heart of it is a really grounded and relatable one.

Maybe even a preferable one.
Yeah, exactly. We talk about the world [the audience sees in "Revolution"] not as a bad or harrowing place — we talk about it with a lot of wish fulfillment. Like, “Wouldn’t it be great to live that simple life and be with your family and be connected?” I’d be dead on Day 2, by the way. [Laughs.] But hardier people would find it a very romantic place to live. [We're] hoping that that concept resonates with people, because we all sort of feel in our guts that we’re over-extended as a technological society. Beyond all our Blackberries and iPhones, we’re dangerously separated from our food and water supplies. And this idea — where hopefully everyone asks, what would they do in that world and how would they survive and realizing how reliant we all are on technology — it’s hopefully a way in that makes people think, as that’s happening in the background of what is really a character drama.

And then the last part is, I didn’t show up with my pitch as, “I’m going to learn from the mistakes of ‘The Event’ and ‘FlashForward.’” I came to this as, “I want to do ‘Lord of the Rings’ on the American highway.” I didn’t approach it [thinking] “Here’s this insidious mystery that I’m going to tease out over seasons.” I came in with, “I want to tell an epic saga on the American road, and I want to tell a story about characters that are on this grand journey over this transformed American landscape, where there’s swords, and magic and secrets and royalty …”

There’s magic?
Well, there’s technology. A woman with a Commodore 64 [which we saw at the end of the "Revolution" pilot] in this world is magic.

She’s Gandalf.
In a way she kind of is. I wanted to tell this grand, sweeping saga, where I wasn’t beholden to procedural elements. In “Supernatural,” the myth has all of that [saga material], but there was also a very specific procedural responsibility we had every week. [With "Revolution,"] I was just interested in, “What about the epic journey of it?” The pure Joseph Campbell myth, this grand saga. Let’s do “Star Wars,” lets do “Lord of the Rings,” let’s do “The Odyssey,” let’s do “The Wizard of Oz.” Let’s tell just a grand journey where I have 12 or 13 or hopefully 22 episodes to really flesh it out and expand it.

The technological breakdown and the reasons for that — do you want to get that out of the way sooner rather than later?
Yeah, you know, for me, why the power went off isn’t nearly as interesting as whether they can turn it back on. And that’s not to say it’s not an important part of the mystery. People love a good mystery, I understand that. But it’s not my taste to be too precious with that.

With “Supernatural,” you would usually wrap up one big piece of mythology before you turned to another. Is that the approach here?
It is my taste to have clarity in mythology. The short answer is, yes, I would like to translate a lot of the things, and am in the process of translating a lot of the things I thought worked about “Supernatural,” in terms of an aggressive mythology, a mythology that was clear and straightforward, a mythology that doesn’t take seven years to reveal, but once it’s revealed, it opens the door to a bigger and scarier world.

Bad Robot is famous for long-term mythology and I would argue that they’re the best in the business at mystery. And J.J.’s been invaluable about [things like] “It we drop in this little piece, plant this little element, we can pay it off later.” Between the two of us, our sensibilities are combining in a way that hopefully the whole is bigger than the sum of its parts. And it’s not going to take forever to get through this mythology, but that there is an intriguing mystery and what-if at the heart of it.

Can you talk about the process of deepening the characters, given that …
That’s what the show’s going to be about? They’ve all got really interesting backstories and histories, and I just like making shows about families. This is a show about a family. Charlie and Miles are related by blood, and the other ones aren’t necessarily related by blood, but family is where you find it. It’s about this de facto family that is traveling across this very dangerous American landscape, and they are stuck together and they irritate each other.

Miles and some of the characters who are a little bit older, they have tragic and interesting backstories. They’re on journeys of salvation and redemption. You just start revealing more and more of the dimensions of who these people are, let them really coalesce as a unit, make them really feel like a unit, make the audience’s hearts go out to them. That’s the best I know about how to make a successful show.

Does that apply to the militia people as well?
To a certain extent. There’s no question that they’re bad guys, because you need a clear dichotomy in this world. You need good guys and bad guys. The reference I use a million times in making this show is “Star Wars,” and you can’t open with the personal story of Jim the Storm Trooper and how he really just wants to make it home for his daughter’s wedding. You can’t start with that story, you have to start with, “They’re bad badasses!”

That’s not to say you can’t eventually get to [the part of the story where] Darth Vader has a mystery and is torn by familial obligation. That’s not to say that Captain Neville doesn’t reveal interesting facets of who he is and certain members of the militia can have very complicated stories as they’re wrestling with the good and evil of it. But for now, we just need to establish the good guys and the bad guys.

And then from there — and this is why making it a TV show and not a movie makes sense — you present these characters and then you start delving into their dysfunctions and what makes them human and what makes them lovable and maddening. You meet Miles Matheson in [the pilot] and he seems like Han Solo, but once you start scratching beneath the surface, there’s an endless depth of heroism and dysfunction and good and bad. You start really investigating these characters, much like I did in “Supernatural” — that’s what I’m really interested in doing here.

Along those lines, I get why NBC wants a big, broad hit. But those don’t often allow for a lot of ambiguity.
No, and the good news is I have very red-blooded movie tastes. I’m not down to make the Abel Ferrara movie, I’m down to make the Spielberg-Lucas-Zemeckis movie. I like accessible; I think accessible and smart are not mutually exclusive, by any means. Look at [executive producer] Jon [Favreau's] work in “Iron Man” and J.J.’s work. I want accessible.

But I’ll say this, we’re a couple scripts in and we have a bunch of outlines turned in to the network, and Bob [Greenblatt, NBC entertainment chairman] and Jen [Salke, NBC entertainment president] are really committed to changing things up. And I’m the first to complain about the suits, believe me. But they are really committed to changing things up, and they are amazingly supportive about a really character-driven storyline, where these characters are complicated and nuanced. They just keep asking for more of it. They have not been pulling us back; if anything, they’ve been pushing us forward.

“Revolution” airs Mondays at 10 p.m. ET on NBC.

Patrick Mott: It’s a Connected World

It’s true: Everywhere we turn there’s technology, and truth be told, we can’t escape it. Think about it — I bet there isn’t one place you can think of where there isn’t technology. We’re just a connected society. We constantly want to be in touch. Smartphones, Twitter and Facebook don’t make it easy for us to disconnect either.

But what happens when we do disconnect? Well, it happened to me and let me tell you, you don’t know fear until technology breaks down (OK, maybe that’s a stretch!). But recently, Apple’s iCloud mail service went down, affecting about one percent of all users. As luck would have it, I was part of that one percent — my email was down and sheer panic set in. Some people may say that’s a bit of an overreaction, but it’s a legitimate fear (‘FOMO,’ or fear of missing out). So what does happen when we, much to our dismay, are forced to disconnect? There is a constant fear that we will miss out on something. And in your head, you can’t stop thinking of what you may miss out on.

But that just isn’t healthy. For almost 48 hours while my email was down, I was in constant fear that I would miss something. As NBC New York reports, depression and anxiety many times can be attributed to FOMO. We live in a world where news is constantly evolving and changing — one minute it’s about the iPhone 5, the next it’s about Britney Spear’s debut on “X Factor.” This is why social media, especially microblogging sites such as Twitter, can be very dangerous. We’re so used to being connected and ‘with it’ that when we’re not, something seems extremely wrong.

So why is it that some can’t just check Twitter for something to do? It turns into a compulsive activity where we constantly need to know and be a part of what’s going on. While some may argue that knowledge is power, getting to the point where you almost have a panic attack when your email is down is just plain ridiculous. Yahoo! News recently reported that nearly 40 percent of 2,000 social media users surveyed stated they would rather do any of the following than give up social media:

Wait in line at the DMV
Read War and Peace
Do their taxes
Give up an hour of sleep each night for a year
Run a marathon
Sit in traffic for four hours while listening to polka music
Get a root canal
Spend a night in jail
Clean the drains in the showers at the local gym
Give up their air conditioner/heater

You may be thinking, “Is disconnection really possible?” Well, a on a five-day vacation, a self-proclaimed social media addict and CNN journalist, Kiran Khalid, gave up social media. Not surprisingly, by disconnecting from obsessively tweeting and checking social media, she really did enjoy her trip.

Here are some quick tips to help you disconnect:

Start by telling your followers that you plan on taking a break or are limiting your use
Set limits on when you’ll use it. For instance, you could set a daily limit of how many times you’ll check social media.
Avoid it — well, not entirely. But many teens have their social networks on their smartphones; keep your phone away from you for a bit so you’re not tempted!
Be realistic. Social media is meant to be fun and informative, so try and keep it that way!

The bottom line is this:In a digital age, we’re connected in so many ways. But remember that it’s not the end of the world if you miss out on being the first to retweet Kim Kardashian’s tweet or the first to know that the iPhone 5 was unveiled. Remember to take the time to disconnect from the world. We all need it, even when we think we don’t. So next time you’re on vacation and you see a beautiful ocean, enjoy it — don’t Instagram it.

Eric Kuhn: Democratizing Democracy

Social media has forever changed the way politicians and constituents interact and
communicate. Now that social media is here to stay, everyone is looking for the “next big
thing” in politics and technology. Here are five startups hoping to impact the political
process.

POPVOX
Politicians and their offices receive too many tweets, Facebook messages, phone calls
and emails and letters from constituents to read them all or make sense of what people are
saying. PopVox — known as the “Legislative LinkedIn” — is an online advocacy platform
that displays every piece of legislation in Congress. Individuals and organizations can
oppose or endorse the bills and leave comments directed toward their representatives.
PopVox will then verify the users’ address and deliver every message (guaranteed).
Congressional offices are receptive to PopVox information because it’s both their
constituents speaking out and because it’s relevant to specific bills.

ELECTNEXT
ElectNext is commonly referred to as the “eHarmony for elections.” The company tries
to help voters determine which is the best candidate (locally and nationally) to vote
for by matching the voter’s feelings on issues to a candidate. Users are asked to choose
issues that are most important to them and then are asked a follow-up of at least ten more
questions. ElectNext combs its database of over 15 million data points on over 4,500
Federal-level candidates to compute which are the most aligned with the voter. The site
aggregates the information from news reports, interest groups and direct quotes. If the
user is so inclined, he or she can donate or sign up to volunteer for the candidate directly
through ElectNext.

AMICUS
Last year, nonprofits spent $60 billion in fundraising costs to raise $300 billion. Cold
calls and paper mail are still the primary ways to request donations. Amicus is a platform
that allows volunteers from a nonprofit to ask their friends for donations. The technology
matches up names to their volunteers’ Facebook friends and assigns each volunteer the
name of a person to reach out to, but only if there is a personal bond. The four-month-old
company, which has grown 80 percent month-over-month since launching, uses social
media to streamline and optimize nonprofit fundraising.

Amicus can also be used for political fundraising and PACs. For example, it’s powering
all outreach efforts for Worker’s Voice, the AFL-CIO’s political action committee.

VOTIZEN
Votizen leverages social networks to bring registered voters together to effect change.
The platform identifies voters on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn and allows them
to find other like-minded individuals. Votizen also enables candidates to identify and
speak directly to voters in their districts. Campaigns can use Votizen to authenticate
who their actual constituents are, thereby allowing a precise and measurable form of
communication between politicians and voters.

Recently, Votizen unveiled a new tool tailored specifically for field directors and
social media managers on campaigns to turn casual social media supporters into active
volunteers — by identifying registered voters in the specific district and giving them a
meaningful task to help the campaign. Though people might “like” or follow a candidate’s
Facebook or Twitter page, that doesn’t equal votes. When someone joins Votizen,
it confirms that the person is a registered voter and then asks if the person wants to
volunteer for a campaign (federal, state and local races), sends a message to his or her
friends, and asks if they want to contact other voters in their social network to support the
candidate.

SOCIAL TEETH
Social Teeth has been called the “Kickstarter for political ads.” Since most politically-
minded people have no access to PAC money, Social Teeth provides a vehicle for
everyone to submit an ad and have the possibility of seeing it next to corporate-funded
commercials and political ads. Anyone can summit an ad, decide the demographic that
it should target and then open it up for people to make small donations. Social Teeth has
partnered with Aegis Media, a major media and digital communications firm. Once the
target amount is raised for the advertisement, Aegis will decide where the best markets
are to get the biggest reach.

Tarun Wadhwa: The Next Privacy Battle: Cameras That Judge Your Every Move

2012-08-30-rncpolicestate2.jpeg

In Tampa, Florida, just outside of the building where the Republican National Convention took place, vigilant observers were perched high above, working day and night to spot suspicious activity. They were not police officers — they were surveillance cameras equipped with “behavior recognition” technology that constantly studied each person to determine whether he or she is the next security threat. By “learning” patterns of behavior, these devices monitor large crowds to alert authorities, within seconds, when something out of the ordinary occurs.

High-tech security measures might have been expected at large politically charged gatherings. But cameras capable of real-time, sophisticated data mining are starting to appear everywhere.

It may soon be the case that it is no longer necessary to have a human being actively monitoring the screens. Computers will be able to do a better job and for a fraction of the cost. Legal protections from surveillance cameras currently focus on where a camera can be placed. This will shift to what types of analysis the camera is capable of performing, and for what purpose.

The reason for the quick adoption of these cameras is simple: human beings are not good at attentively watching large amounts of video for very long. In the United States, it is estimated that there are 30 million surveillance cameras, which create more than 4 billion hours of footage every week. At best only a small portion of this footage will ever be reviewed. London, for example, has close to 500,000 surveillance cameras. But this has only helped police in solving three percent of all street robberies.

Instead of trying to solve crimes after they have happened, advances in camera technology can spot problems as they are occurring. On Liberty Island, home to one of the nation’s most famous landmarks, surveillance camera data are brought together and analyzed in order to spot when somebody abandons a bag or tries to stay on the island after hours. This technology can alert police to the appearance of an imminent fight. Across the Bay, in Manhattan, surveillance cameras can track a person’s general description. If there is a report about a suspicious person wearing a red shirt, for example, every person wearing a red shirt in sight of any of their thousands of cameras can be displayed together — in an instant.

It’s not just law enforcement that has taken note of this. Retail outlets such as Macy’s, Babys ‘R’ Us, and CVS have installed systems in some of their stores that can spot shoppers who do unusual things — such as remove many items from a shelf at once, open a case that is normally locked, or walk suspiciously through the aisles. Pathmark grocery stores have implemented similar technology that will quickly alert managers of potential shoplifting and employee fraud — as it takes place.

These systems are programmed to assume that everybody is a potential shoplifter, terrorist, or criminal. In addition to issues related to presumption of innocence, this raises many questions about privacy. The idea of a person closely watching our movements is unsettling. Does it “feel” different if it’s just a computer rather than a human being?

WikiLeaks cables released earlier this month revealed a widespread use by local and federal agencies in the U.S. of TrapWire, a technology that aggregates incident reports and camera feeds to try to detect potential terrorist threats. Understandably, there was uproar over the lack of public disclosure. These same features are being used in other parts of the world to combat dissent. In China, security cameras are commonly used to count the number of people in crosswalks. These alert the authorities if a crowd forms at an unusual time–which could be sign of unsanctioned protest. Around the world, companies like Sony, Kraft, and Adidas are also installing cameras to target ads to consumers based on their physical features.

The last two decades have largely settled the question of where a security camera can be placed. The promise of increased safety has trumped the right to remain anonymous. In the near future, not having behavioral detection systems present will be seen as a danger and liability, especially as the cost of monitoring technology drops and advanced surveillance becomes even more affordable.

So far, there has been little consequence to this because nothing is usually done with the footage. But that is going to change. There will, undoubtedly, be concerns arising related to how these datasets can be combined with personally identifiable information to track not only our locations and activities, but our feelings and state. You can expect these to be the next privacy battles in the courts. One would expect the Republicans — who often consider themselves to be the defenders of free speech and liberty — to lead the charge against these technologies.

Instead, at the Convention in Tampa, cameras worked overtime alongside police officers to make sure that things ran smoothly. If the protests had turned violent, as they did at the 2008 Convention in St. Paul, the authorities would have known when and where to react. Going forward, it will be interesting to see how the need for domestic security will be balanced against individual rights and our need for privacy.

This piece was originally published on Forbes. Photo courtesy of PublicIntelligence.net

Apple Explains Missing iPhone 5 Feature

By Alistair Barr and David Henry

SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK (Reuters) – EBay Inc Chief Executive John Donahoe often quotes a merchant saying NFC stands for “Not For Commerce” – and dismisses the prospects of Near Field Communication technology used to turn cellphones into mobile wallets.

He got some support this week from Apple Inc, which did not embed NFC chips into the iPhone 5.

NFC proponents had hoped Apple would endorse the technology, which passes encrypted data between devices at close range without contact. So instead of swiping a credit card, shoppers can simply wave their phones at a checkout terminal to pay for their goods.

The technology is backed by the largest U.S. carriers and credit card companies, but has failed to take off in America because merchants have been reluctant to spend money to upgrade their checkout terminals until NFC is more widely adopted.

“Anyone hoping NFC would be a reality soon is disappointed,” said Sanjay Sakhrani, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. “Many in the industry were hoping inclusion in the iPhone would be a springboard for more adoption. This takes the impetus away.”

NFC technology, which has uses beyond mobile payments, is backed by Isis, a mobile wallet joint venture between Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc and T-Mobile USA. Isis’ financial services partners include American Express, JPMorgan Chase and Capital One Financial.

Like many new technologies, NFC is hampered by a chicken-and-egg problem. Mobile phone makers like Apple are reluctant to take on the extra cost and engineering effort of embedding NFC chips because many merchants can’t accept payments this way yet. Meanwhile, merchants won’t install NFC until more consumers have the technology on their phones.

Isis said on Thursday that it was delaying the launch of its NFC mobile payments service for the second time this year.

“Isis has placed a massive bet on NFC,” said David Evans, founder of Market Platform Dynamics and an adviser to companies in the payments business. Apple’s decision “is another reason to believe that Isis doesn’t have much promise of getting off the ground.”

Apple did not include NFC because it is not clear the technology solves any current problem, marketing chief Phil Schiller told AllThingsD on Wednesday.

APPLE: WE’LL PASS

Instead of embracing NFC, Apple is developing Passbook, a mobile app that pulls together loyalty cards, tickets and coupons on the new iPhone. Many analysts consider this an early version of a digital wallet, except Passbook does not let users link their credit and debit cards yet.

Other digital wallets have already been developed by companies including eBay’s PayPal, Google Inc and Visa Inc. These wallets aim to bring together credit and debit cards, bank accounts, loyalty cards, rewards and coupons in one place, letting shoppers pay for purchases mostly online, but increasingly in physical stores too.

NFC’s advocates argue it eliminates plastic and cash and can be more secure than magnetic strips. But that alone will not persuade consumers to stop using credit cards in stores because plastic is already so convenient, experts say.

“It is a new technology and one that is unfamiliar to users. So that opens up new possibilities for abuse and naiveté,” said Charlie Miller, principal research consultant with Accuvant. But he said NFC allows for interesting security options that traditional credit cards don’t, such as account numbers that change dynamically.

PayPal is betting that other services that make digital wallets more useful will encourage consumers to switch – it is designing a digital wallet that helps consumers do as many things as possible from one place, including buying flight or movie tickets, sending money to other people and tapping coupons, rewards and loyalty cards.

“Technology is not what’s going to win this digital wallet war. It’s going to be about the consumer value proposition,” said Carey Kolaja, senior director for PayPal’s product team.

Others argue NFC still has potential, partly because merchant incentives from Visa and MasterCard are expected to spark a wave of payment terminal upgrades in coming years. These upgrades will include NFC capability.

“It is difficult to buy a new terminal that doesn’t already have NFC technology, and soon it will be impossible,” said Rick Oglesby of consulting firm Aite Group.

But the software and service providers behind the terminals will also have to be ready to accept and process payments that come with coupons, loyalty cards and rewards programs.

At the moment, most terminals can handle the amount of the transaction and the card number and not much else, Oglesby said.

Until this is all sorted out, Apple will likely wait to enter the payments business aggressively, Oglesby and others said. Apple took a similar approach to 4G LTE wireless technology, waiting until coverage was wide enough this year to unveil an iPhone that uses it, Oglesby noted.

“They won’t do something until they know a lot of their customers will use the service,” he said.

(Reporting By Alistair Barr in San Francisco and David Henry in New York; additional reporting by Jim Finkle in Boston and Sinead Carew in New York; Editing by Edwin Chan, Tiffany Wu and Phil Berlowitz)

Alex Counts: Mobile Phones and the Rise of the Microentrepreneurs

The simple idea that people can improve their livelihoods when provided with the right tools and opportunities has been transformative in developed and emerging markets alike. A simple and widely available tool — the mobile phone — is creating substantial impact in the developing world, changing the lives of low-income individuals, especially in rural communities. Cellphone use has experienced its greatest growth in emerging markets, where much of the community has bypassed traditional land-line telephones. Today, six billion mobile phones are being used throughout the world, with approximately 75 percent of users living in developing countries. Mobile technology provides unparalleled opportunities to break the cycle of poverty by providing access to markets, information, financial services and viable business opportunities that were previously unavailable.

Not only is the pervasiveness of cell phones striking in the developing world, but so too is the way they are being used. Consider Indonesia, where 80 percent of the population uses a cell phone and 96 percent of those users text regularly — even though nearly 75 percent of citizens live on less than $2.50 per day. Many people in rural Indonesia are embracing mobile technology as a strategic business tool. Farmers are now able to access information about weather conditions and market pricing for their cash crops, the unemployed can search for job opportunities electronically, and the unbanked can engage in secure financial transactions. In this way, mobile phones are empowering users to gain control of often volatile financial conditions, particularly in informal markets.

Recognizing the opportunity offered by this technology, Grameen Foundation and eBay Foundation began working together this summer to build solutions that address market challenges facing microentrepreneurs in Indonesia. Our joint effort will support Grameen Foundation’s Mobile Microfranchise initiative, which currently works with a network of more than 10,000 women microentrepreneurs, heavily concentrated in the West Java region. A 2010 study found that 47 percent of participants in the Mobile Microfranchise program doubled their income by their fourth month of participation.

The success of this initial endeavor led Grameen Foundation to explore ways to drive even greater impact. In the same way that mobile has been critical to the development of Grameen Foundation’s initiatives in Indonesia, it has been a core area of focus for eBay as well. In 2011 alone, eBay transacted $5 billion through mobile devices and 60 percent of mobile purchases came from outside the U.S. We quickly realized this remarkable shared strategy and alignment of need and expertise between our two organizations. Our subsequent conversations led to a $750,000 grant from eBay Foundation and a concept to develop the Mobile Transaction Platform and the Mobile Marketplace, as well as a commitment to engage eBay staff throughout the life of the project.

Through these two new applications, we aim to extend the existing efforts of Grameen Foundation’s technology platform to give Indonesia’s rural poor a wider range of services and opportunities to improve their lives. We expect our work will contribute to the growth of the Indonesia-based network from 10,500 to 60,000 entrepreneurs over the next three years. And the microfranchisees — a majority of whom are women who sell airtime minutes in their communities — will soon be able to provide an estimated 4.5 million customers with access to a mobile marketplace and transaction platform.

Through our efforts, microentrepreneurs will gain access to the tools and opportunities needed to support their enterprises and gain greater financial independence. By combining our unique areas of expertise — eBay’s mobile capabilities with Grameen Foundation’s poverty alleviation strategies — we are able to achieve much more than either of our organizations could individually. Not only are we able to expand Grameen Foundation’s impact as the organization works to build technology solutions that empower the poor and end the cycle of poverty, but we are also able to provide a powerful new blueprint for engaging with pro-poor organizations moving forward. In fact, other collaborations have already begun in India, the Philippines and Kenya.

We believe that by bringing together the right mix of resources, expertise, and employee talent, we will be able to make remarkable progress in Indonesia and beyond. We look forward to all the positive impact we will be able to drive together through the development of these new mobile technologies, and we hope this program will serve as an example for future collaborations between the private sector and social innovators.

Alex Counts is the President and CEO of Grameen Foundation.

Lauren Moore is the Head of Global Social Innovation, eBay Inc., and President, eBay Foundation.

How To Save Your Movie Night From Certain Disaster

It’s happened to all of us. Comfy on the couch (or futon) and with popcorn popped, we’re leaning in for a little snog time when the DVD starts skipping. Luckily, it happens less with streaming movie technology, but that means it’s most likely to happen to those DVDs we love the most.

Rather than spending the rest of the night bemoaning the loss of a classic while gluing together sparkling plot points like a Mother’s Day elbow macaroni-on-construction-paper masterpiece, take a tip from Austin Pohlen here. He’s Chow.com’s genius intern from Boston University, who’s offering HuffPost College some tips on surviving the mini fails of college life.

WATCH: Gorgeous Short Film Shot Entirely With Google ‘Glasses’

Google Glass — the eagerly-anticipated, Internet-connected tech-specs being developed by Google — have been all over the place in the past few months: They’ve gone skydiving; they’ve been trampolining; they’ve even strutted their stuff on the catwalk during New York Fashion Week.

Now, we can add one more venture to the Google Glass activity log: cameraman.

Google has released a short film about Diane von Furstenburg — the legendary fashion designer who incorporated sets of Google Glass into her Fashion Week show last week — which uses only footage recorded on the Glass camera before, during and after the DVF NYFW show.

You can watch the video below (and look out for the Sergey Brin cameo!):

Says Google about the film in the YouTube (natch) description:

Experience the DVF Spring 2013 show at New York Fashion Week through the eyes of the people who made it happen—the stylists, the models and Diane von Furstenberg herself. All the footage you see here was filmed using only Glass, Google’s latest technology that lets you capture moments from a unique, new perspective. See what happens when fashion and technology come together like you’ve never seen before.

Though DVF seems enchanted by Google’s Glass, others are more skeptical: A high-profile early review of the next-gen spectacles in the Wall Street Journal by Spencer Ante this past week notably called the futuristic glasses “not ready for the real world yet.”

Google Glass is scheduled for release to the public by the end of 2013, so Sergey Brin and company have time to fix some of the problems Ante found. Google will ship prototype “Explorer Editions” sets to developers in early 2013; those sold for $1500 apiece, though the company says that Glass will be far cheaper when it goes on sale in stores.

You can view more photos and videos of Google Glass below:

Geekiest President Ever?

Looks like our Commander-in-chief has a little bit of a nerdy side.

“We came in when the economy was tanking and our first priority wasn’t redecorating,” President Barak Obama recently told Vanity Fair. But since settling in, Obama’s made at least one interesting adjustment to his official White House workspace.

Obama stated in the interview that previous administrations “had a bunch of plates” lining the Oval Office shelves. “I’m not a dish guy,” he told Vanity Fair. Instead, he swapped the china out for famous patents and models, including Samuel Morse’s 1849 patent for the first telegraph. “This is the start of the Internet right here,” he told the magazine.

After learning of Obama’s decorations in the Oval Office, The Atlantic dubbed him our “geek in chief” — and maybe that catchy title holds true.

Obama was one of the first presidential candidates to truly embrace social media, resulting in an overwhelming response from potential voters during the 2008 election. Since then, contenders from both sides of the political spectrum have embraced Facebook Fan Pages and the Twittersphere to reach out to prospective voters. But Obama still has clout in the digital world: During the 2012 Democratic National Convention, the President’s speech prompted 52,756 tweets per minute, a new Twitter record for a politician.

Obama also recently hosted an “Ask Me Anything” session on social news site Reddit, spurring record traffic to the site and prompting questions about everything from the drug war to the economy.

Still, even a “geek in chief” has occasional technology snafoos. Just this past week, Obama couldn’t quite seem to operate an iPhone while campaigning in Florida. “See, I still have a BlackBerry,” the president quipped to journalists after struggling with the iPhone for a moment.

Is Obama our geekiest president ever, or does he still have a lot to learn about technology?

Man Accused Of Illegally Taking Military Tech Secrets To China

NEWARK, New Jersey (AP) — A Chinese man illegally took data on military-related technology from his New Jersey company back to his home country and lied to authorities about it upon his return, prosecutors charged Wednesday in the first day of his federal trial.

Nonsense, Sixing Liu’s attorney told jurors during his opening statement. The attorney, James Tunick, characterized Liu as a diligent and conscientious worker who was ill-informed about import-export laws and merely downloaded the information to work on outside the office.

Liu was arrested last year at his home in Deerfield, Illinois, and was charged with exporting defense-related data without a license, lying to authorities and possessing stolen trade secrets. The secrets dealt with technology that could be used for target locators and other military applications.

Liu, a legal permanent U.S. resident, was living in New Jersey and working at New Jersey-based Space & Navigation, a division of New York company L3 Communications that develops navigation devices and other components for the Department of Defense.

According to the indictment, Liu took a personal laptop computer to conferences on nanotechnology in Chongqing in 2009 and Shanghai in 2010 and, while there, gave presentations that described the technology he was working on, in violation of U.S. laws that prohibit exporting defense materials without a license or approval from the Department of State.

A customs agent at Newark Liberty International Airport noticed a VIP badge from the Shanghai conference when Liu returned home in November 2010. When questioned, Liu lied about the Shanghai conference, Assistant U.S. Attorney Gurbir Singh Grewal said in his opening statement.

Liu knew his company’s rules that prohibit taking work home without a supervisor’s OK and illegally took the data as a way to help him get a job in China, Grewal said.

“It’s not about taking work home,” he told jurors. “This is not an environment where you can do that.”

Tunick contended that Liu’s taking of the information occurred when he downloaded emails on his laptop so he could see them without requiring Internet access. He said the conference in Shanghai was attended by professors from many countries, including the U.S.

“Is the fact he went to his alma mater and spoke some sort of motive in this case?” Tunick asked. “There was nothing nefarious about this conference. He wasn’t looking for work in China. There was no motive in this case because there was no crime.”

Liu’s training in the laws governing the export of defense materials consisted of 15 minutes on his first day of work, between sessions on employee benefits and sexual harassment guidelines, Tunick said.

An expert in military technology testified early in the afternoon, and a computer forensics specialist was expected to testify.

One juror was dismissed after opening statements but before testimony began after she expressed concern that she might know one of the scheduled witnesses.

Is The iPhone 5 A Victim Of Its Own Success?

It may have been the worst kept secret in technology history. So much so that when the iPhone 5 finally made its debut on Wednesday in San Francisco, many observers were disappointed because there were no surprises.

The much-ballyhooed device — on sale in Canada through Bell, Rogers, Telus and their sub-brands on Sept. 21 — is packed with everything that was expected: a four-inch screen that’s half an inch bigger than its predecessors and slightly sharper, an A6 processor that’s twice as fast as the iPhone 4S, and long-term evolution (LTE) cellular connectivity that will make for much zippier downloads.

It’s also got a slightly better camera that can now take panoramic photos, and it’s thinner and lighter too — about 20 per cent less weighty than the 4S.

On the software side, the iPhone 5 will have better email organization, FaceTime video calling over cellular connections, easy photo stream sharing, a new Maps app and a nifty folder called Passbook, where all sorts of electronic tickets, boarding passes and coupons can be stored.

All told, virtually every specification and feature had been leaked, pieced together by tech detectives or shared by Apple prior to the event. So why the disappointment?

Victim of its own success

Apple has, in many ways, become a victim of its own success. Over the past five years since the launch of the original iPhone, it has grown into the biggest company in the world by market capitalization. Its product launches are thus the most heavily scrutinized — and hyped — events in the technology world.

With each successive event, onlookers grow increasingly curious as to whether the company will again hit a home run, or whether there will be signs that its golden touch might finally be running out, like it eventually has to. Against that backdrop, it’s difficult to surprise people.

In some ways, the iPhone 5 is playing catch-up. Some of its capabilities are already found in other phones that have been on the market for months. Several Android devices, for example, do panoramic photos and run on LTE networks.

Other devices are using near-field communication, a wireless technology that lets phones share photos or make mobile payments simply by touching them to a sensor. Apple obviously decided to forego NFC with this version, but that’s evidence that the infrastructure for mobile payments is not yet sufficiently developed, according to Forrester Research analysts Frank Gillett.

When mobile payments start to gain traction, as they could over the next year, Apple will then add the capability, he added. It’s a wait-and-see approach.

So, will consumers rush to snap up the iPhone 5, despite the lack of surprises? Many analysts believe so. One report earlier this week suggested the new gadget could singlehandedly boost the U.S. economy.

3.6 million iPhones in Canada

According to Toronto-based tracking firm Solutions Research Group, there are approximately 3.6 million iPhones in circulation in Canada, accounting for about a third of all smartphones. Over the next 12 months, the company expects about 1.5 million new iPhone users to come into the fold, the vast majority of whom will be buying the latest device.

Based on surveys gauging buying intent, this coming Christmas period is going to be the biggest season for smartphones in some time.

“[Apple] are very well positioned to break records come February when they announce what happened during the Christmas season,” says Solutions Research Group president Kaan Yigit. “My vote is it will do very well.”

So what exactly is it about the iPhone 5 that will have people lining up? After spending some time with the new device at a hands-on session after the press conference, it’s clear that its weight — or, more specifically, lack thereof — will be a big selling point. The new phone is touted as being 20 per cent lighter than the 4S, but when holding the two at the same time, it’s easy to think it’s even lighter than that.

The main material is now anodized aluminum, with a lot less glass involved, which takes away a lot of the heft. The A6 processor is also smaller than its predecessor, so that’s also saving weight.

Other than that, the iPhone 5 represents a series of incremental improvements. There’s nothing earth-shattering, which is disappointing to those who want to be surprised, but it’s evidently going to be enough for the millions of consumers looking for a new phone.