Tag Archives: way

Hugh Evans: Technology to End Extreme Poverty

Using an iPhone in downtown New York, or typing at a keyboard in suburban Houston, you’re a long way, physically and emotionally, from the more than one billion people on our planet who live on less than $1.50 each day.

The world’s extreme poor — concentrated largely in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia — are out of sight and out of mind, except for the occasional pang of guilt we feel when glimpsing their lives on TV.

Increasingly though, these barriers are breaking down, and the world’s poor are becoming visible in our lives. Technology is changing the way we interact with people on the other side of the world who, though we may never meet, are impacted every day by our actions.

From the bananas we buy in the supermarkets, to the clothes we pick up at the mall, or the investments that grow our pension funds, the world’s poor are part of the same supply chains and systems as us. Their livelihoods are directly impacted by the decisions we make each day.

They’re using technology that was pioneered in countries like the U.S. to fight poverty themselves. M-Pesa, a mobile money transfer service for people without bank accounts, has more than 17 million customers across sub-Saharan Africa. Ipaidabribe.com has crowd-sourced more than 20,000 reports of officials who demanded bribes in India, and has now expanded to Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan and Zimbabwe.

Closer to home charities, campaigners and fundraisers are using technology to create a generation of global citizens, who alongside being American, Cubs fans and New Yorkers, also see themselves as part of the wider world, and people who will stand up and use their money, their networks, and their voices to ensure that we create a world without extreme poverty.

It’s in this vein that we recently launched Global Citizen, a new platform for people here in the U.S. and around the world to learn more about the progress that’s being made in international development and take action to build the movement to end extreme poverty forever. Combining articles, videos and infographics about the issues with actions like signing petitions, sharing to social networks and donating, Global Citizens can earn points for taking action, and, over time, get access to rewards that recognize their contributions.

Since the launch of Global Citizen 42 days ago, it is clear that the issue of global poverty resonates with everyday Americans. More than 70,000 users have signed up to take action and earn tickets to the Global Citizen Festival on September 29. There have been more than 61,000 tweets using the hash-tag #GlobalCitizen in the past three weeks.

For us, Global Citizen is about giving people the opportunity to go on a journey. Fighting extreme poverty is a complex and messy process, and it’s going to take a lot more than just signing a petition to end it. But, when we give people the opportunity to learn about the issues, see how they connect together, navigate their own way to action, and then take it to scale, we have a tool that can and is already starting to shift attitudes and actions.

As one user, Patrick, wrote on our Facebook wall recently, “At first it was really a lot about winning. But after watching these videos it became a lot more than that. It became about awareness and inspiration!” And anther Sharon Singleton wrote “Such an incredible cause and reality is if I hadn’t had the website handed to me, I wouldn’t have done so much research. This has opened my eyes.”

Awareness by itself isn’t much use, but linked into a broader story with clear actions, it’s vital. Research by the Kaiser Family Foundation recently found that the American public think that 27 percent of the federal budget is spent on foreign aid. In reality, it’s around 1 percent. Public awareness about foreign aid shapes what our politicians say and do, and combined with actions to make our voices heard, it can have a big impact.

By itself technology doesn’t end poverty, but it allows us to create the connections and relationships that together can break down the systems that keep people poor.

Hugh Evans and Simon Ross are the Co-founders of the Global Poverty Project and Executive Producers of the Global Citizen Festival

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Hugh Evans: Technology to End Extreme Poverty

Using an iPhone in downtown New York, or typing at a keyboard in suburban Houston, you’re a long way, physically and emotionally, from the more than one billion people on our planet who live on less than $1.50 each day.

The world’s extreme poor — concentrated largely in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia — are out of sight and out of mind, except for the occasional pang of guilt we feel when glimpsing their lives on TV.

Increasingly though, these barriers are breaking down, and the world’s poor are becoming visible in our lives. Technology is changing the way we interact with people on the other side of the world who, though we may never meet, are impacted every day by our actions.

From the bananas we buy in the supermarkets, to the clothes we pick up at the mall, or the investments that grow our pension funds, the world’s poor are part of the same supply chains and systems as us. Their livelihoods are directly impacted by the decisions we make each day.

They’re using technology that was pioneered in countries like the U.S. to fight poverty themselves. M-Pesa, a mobile money transfer service for people without bank accounts, has more than 17 million customers across sub-Saharan Africa. Ipaidabribe.com has crowd-sourced more than 20,000 reports of officials who demanded bribes in India, and has now expanded to Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan and Zimbabwe.

Closer to home charities, campaigners and fundraisers are using technology to create a generation of global citizens, who alongside being American, Cubs fans and New Yorkers, also see themselves as part of the wider world, and people who will stand up and use their money, their networks, and their voices to ensure that we create a world without extreme poverty.

It’s in this vein that we recently launched Global Citizen, a new platform for people here in the U.S. and around the world to learn more about the progress that’s being made in international development and take action to build the movement to end extreme poverty forever. Combining articles, videos and infographics about the issues with actions like signing petitions, sharing to social networks and donating, Global Citizens can earn points for taking action, and, over time, get access to rewards that recognize their contributions.

Since the launch of Global Citizen 42 days ago, it is clear that the issue of global poverty resonates with everyday Americans. More than 70,000 users have signed up to take action and earn tickets to the Global Citizen Festival on September 29. There have been more than 61,000 tweets using the hash-tag #GlobalCitizen in the past three weeks.

For us, Global Citizen is about giving people the opportunity to go on a journey. Fighting extreme poverty is a complex and messy process, and it’s going to take a lot more than just signing a petition to end it. But, when we give people the opportunity to learn about the issues, see how they connect together, navigate their own way to action, and then take it to scale, we have a tool that can and is already starting to shift attitudes and actions.

As one user, Patrick, wrote on our Facebook wall recently, “At first it was really a lot about winning. But after watching these videos it became a lot more than that. It became about awareness and inspiration!” And anther Sharon Singleton wrote “Such an incredible cause and reality is if I hadn’t had the website handed to me, I wouldn’t have done so much research. This has opened my eyes.”

Awareness by itself isn’t much use, but linked into a broader story with clear actions, it’s vital. Research by the Kaiser Family Foundation recently found that the American public think that 27 percent of the federal budget is spent on foreign aid. In reality, it’s around 1 percent. Public awareness about foreign aid shapes what our politicians say and do, and combined with actions to make our voices heard, it can have a big impact.

By itself technology doesn’t end poverty, but it allows us to create the connections and relationships that together can break down the systems that keep people poor.

Hugh Evans and Simon Ross are the Co-founders of the Global Poverty Project and Executive Producers of the Global Citizen Festival

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

The Wearable, Automatic Camera Designed To Capture Your ‘Hidden’ Life

A new automatic, wearable camera is promising to “change the way we think about photography” – and potentially privacy – by taking the photographer out of the process.

The Autographer is a hands-free, digital camera that automatically takes thousands of photographs a day and stores them for review on a smartphone app.

Designed to be worn constantly, the camera takes pictures as a user goes through their daily lives – however ordinary or extraordinary.

It will cost £399 when released for sale in November.

Housed in a relatively small, discreet black case, the camera is designed to be worn on a necklace lanyard, or on the strap of a bag.

It has five on-board sensors to detect changes in temperature, light, motion, direction and colour, and uses those cues to take shots with its wide-angle lens.

The camera has a 136-degree field of view, meaning it can capture more of a scene than a typical camera phone.

It also features 8GB of memory and takes 5-megapixel images, allowing it to store many days’ worth of pictures.

Thanks to a Bluetooth chip on board the device can interact with your smartphone via a bespoke app, letting users manage their photos, export video files and GIFs and delete specific images if an unwitting subject objects.

OMG Life, who announced the device on Monday, said users would be able to “watch their ‘unseen’ moments unfold through natural, unpredictable images”. It said the images and videos revealed by the camera would show “a surprising new take on their world”.

The idea emerged from similar devices used to help the treatment of Alzheimer’s and dementia, OMG said.

OMG said those devices, based on Microsoft’s SenseCam technology, have proven popular as a way to help sufferers of those illnesses manage their daily lives and cope with the trauma of impaired memory.

The Autographer is an all-new consumer device, however, which OMG is pitching at artists and creatives who want to capture images in new and unpredictable ways.

autographer

The camera has been designed with a bright, yellow ring around the lens, intended to let you know if someone wearing an Autographer has it turned on or off.

Ideas such as wearing one to a festival or one a night out have been pitched as potential uses – but OMG is hoping to be surprised by the creative ways early adopters find to use one.

Simon Randall, managing director of OMG Life, told the Huffington Post UK that he is are aware some people may not want to be part of the wearer’s experiment, but is confident it will attract the “creatives” and “image makers” prepared to adopt the new technology early.

desktunes Music at your fingertips! ... Desktunes offers free music streaming within a simple set up and an elegant design. You can build your own playlists and view your ?ow Playing?track and album art. You?l have live radio at your fingertips with hundreds of radio stations. Keep your music on your desktop and download Desktunes now ?for free! click here Free music streaming - Stays on your desktop - Simple set up and elegant design - Build your own Playlists - Keep your Now Playing track visible

Apple’s Lost Mapportunity: How Did A Tech Star Lose Its Way?

Apple’s mojo over the years has come from its knack for releasing products that aren’t the first, but are the best.

Its highly anticipated new Apple Maps offering is neither.

Apple’s latest mobile operating system, iOS 6, has replaced Google Maps with Apple Maps, which many users gripe is an inferior product that misplaces airports, omits entire towns, loses buildings and has even renamed Berlin. It’s the opposite of what’s come to be expected from a company known for taking its time to launch products that, though late to market, boast intuitive, beautifully designed features that “just work.”

So what went wrong? How did Apple lose its way with Maps?

Experts attribute Maps’ shortcomings to the Cupertino company’s reliance on a patchwork of mapping data culled from myriad sources, noting also that Apple may have underestimated the challenge of mapping the world’s lanes and landmarks. The “half-baked” Apple Maps still needs more time, more people and better information, analysts say. Whether it will get those ingredients is another question.

Apple acknowledges that its maps service is “a major initiative” that it is “just getting started with,” yet the risk for Apple is that Maps has only so many chances to help users find their way before they tell it to get lost.

“This could backfire on [Apple] and could create all kinds of consumer resentment,” said Yankee Group analyst Carl Howe. “They’re really going to have to get the ship righted quickly because there are so many alternatives for users.”

Mike Dobson, founder of mapping consultancy TeleMapics, sums up Apple Maps’ problem with one four-letter word: data.

Like a designer trying to create a single garment out of pieces from a dozen different creators, Apple has tried to stitch together a cohesive map using information and services licensed from some 20 sources, each with varying degrees of accuracy and their own system for classifying locations. What one company considers Palo Alto, another might call San Jose. Ultimately, it’s the user who’s left confused.

“Because Apple has licensed data from companies, not created it, they have to do the mixing [of the data], and it’s in mixing that data that mis-associations have occurred,” said Dobson. “They’re taking data from disparate sources, who haven’t classified the data in the same way and may not have had the correct geographic location, and they’re blending them together in the hope that by attaching one map to someone else’s map, it’ll all fit together. It just doesn’t.”

“It appears to me that they seriously underestimated the size of this challenge,” Dobson added. “It’s obvious to me that the first time humans ever saw parts of Apple’s maps is when users looked at it in iOS 6.”

Google tried the same mixing method when it first created its own map service, but quickly realized that building reliable, up-to-date maps required Google to be the source of its own data, notes Dobson. Google launched a fleet of Street View cars, trikes and snowmobiles to drive the roads it showed on its maps and ensure the maps’ appearance matched the streets’. Five million miles of driving have gone into Google Maps and the Street View team updates its information regularly.

Knowing that no single company can match the manpower of millions of users, Google built an infrastructure through which to crowdsource information from its users, who have mapped remote areas for Google using Google Map Maker and send Google thousands of corrections a day.

So long as Apple outsources its data collection and relies on software rather than real-world scanning and human analysis, Apple Maps will fall short of Google Maps, Dobson predicts.

“Apple needs to learn what Google learned a long time ago: They also started down the algorithmic path…but Google had an awakening and realized it needed Street View and human operatives to be sure things were where they were supposed to be on the map,” said Dobson. “You have to have, in some way, boots on the ground.”

Apple is already angling to turn its millions of iPhone users into “boots on the ground.” People can report errors directly to Apple via the Maps app, and GPS data from their phones can help Apple monitor the status of streets.

“Maps is a cloud-based solution and the more people use it, the better it will get,” an Apple spokeswoman said in a statement. “We appreciate all of the customer feedback and are working hard to make the customer experience even better.”

While that GPS data might detect one-way streets, detours and skinny alleyways, Dobson said it can’t provide the same detailed information Street View collects about everything beside the road, from street signs and addresses to speed limits and business locations.

At the same time that it seeks to turn users into data-gatherers, Apple is also aggressively trying to hire maps engineers: There are 18 openings for maps engineers listed on Apple’s website. Tellingly, 15 of those positions were posted this summer.

By comparison, Google relies on hundreds of people to map a single country.

Some analysts say Apple should be out shopping rather than staffing up. Though Apple, which has never made a multi-billion dollar acquisition, has historically preferred buying small companies, experts suggest the company should buy a mapping service rather than attempt to build one. With over $117 billion in cash, it can certainly afford to do so.

“Trying to reinvent the wheel with in-house talent and some acquired talent is a long road,” said Chris Silva, an analyst with the Altimeter Group. “And if they were concerned about getting Maps to market in a rapid fashion, then an outright acquisition might have been the way to do that.”

An element of corporate hubris may be hindering Apple’s mapping service, and tech entrepreneur and blogger Anil Dash argues Maps’ troubled debut stems not only from a dearth of data, but a lack of concern for the user.

“Apple made this maps change despite its shortcomings because they put their own priorities for corporate strategy ahead of user experience. That’s a huge change for Apple in the post-iPod era, where they’ve built so much of their value by doing the hard work as a company so that things could be easy for users,” wrote Dash in his blog.

Even if Apple users might have trouble finding their way to Paddington Station or Stratford-upon-Avon (Both are absent from Apple Maps.), it’s doubtful that will keep them from the Apple Store.

Michael Gartenberg, research director at the Gartner Group, predicts Apple Maps’ shortcomings won’t decrease demand for the iPhone 5, and counters Apple Maps is actually an upgrade from Google Maps for some users (particularly drivers who can use its turn-by-turn navigation tool).

People are “still lining up around the block to buy the iPhone 5,” said Gartenberg. “It [Apple Maps] doesn’t strike us as something that will have a lot of impact, especially when Apple says, ‘hey, it’s our first stab at it and we’re going to get better.’ Apple does have pretty good track record of introducing things and improving on them quickly.”

John Paul Caponigro: Strengthen Your Creativity With Cell Phone Photography

2012-09-21-01_Vavilov.jpg

These images were all made in the space of 45 minutes spent wandering the decks of the Russian research vessel Akademik Sergey Vavilov during an arctic cruise from Svalbard to Greenland and Iceland.

I love the spontaneity inherent in cell phone photography. Having a cell phone camera constantly at your side changes the way you see the world. You become more aware of the world around you, taking notice of people, places, things and events that might pass you by unconsidered. You tune in – creatively. If you want to live a more considered life I highly recommend trying cell phone photography. You can quickly and easily capture the moments in between moments. Cell phone photography offers an invitation to celebrate the ‘smaller’ events in between the ‘larger’ events of your life. There may be a little Zen spirit at work here sometimes it is first shot best shot.

These accumulated moments add up. Over time the products of these stolen moments build something larger. Unintended bodies of work may materialize unexpectedly. The constant pull of brief episodes of creativity may even prepare the way for extended bursts of creativity.

Exercising creativity is like exercising a muscle; the more you practice the stronger you get.

Follow John Paul Caponigro on Google+, Facebook, and Twitter.

John Paul Caponigro is an environmental artist and author, who leads workshops, seminars, and lectures internationally. Learn more at www.johnpaulcaponigro.com.

Arianna Huffington: Timeless Truths

Our idea with Huffington was to create a different kind of reading experience — with longer pieces, deeper reporting and beautiful images. Each issue is meant to be taken in over time, instead of gulped down on the way to work. In our hyper-connected world, it’s easy to know the facts, data and statistics about a story, but facts are different than truth.

And one way to get at deeper truths and meaning is by the kind of long-form reporting we’ve been featuring at Huffington since the first issue, with reporters putting flesh and blood on the data being thrown at us. But there’s also a kind of truth that you can only get through untruth — through fiction. And that’s why we’re now adding fiction and poetry to our menu at Huffington.

As practically any fact in the world has become more and more easily available to us, the timeless truths have become more elusive. So each section in our fiction issue will have a timeless theme, and explore that theme in different ways through stories and poetry. This issue’s themes will be explained in our editors’ letter here.

This piece appears in the Literary Issue of our FREE new weekly iPad magazine, Huffington, in the iTunes App store.

Our Robot World: How Close Are We To Building The Ultimate Robot?

Dr Chris Jones is Director for Research Advancement and Senior Principal Investigator for iRobot Corporation.

Yes, he has a job title right out of a Isaac Asimov short story. And, if life was as narratively just as fiction, he would be either a megalomaniac building giant robot spiders for his own twisted delight, or a doomed visionary destined for ruin at the hands of an automaton militia.

He is neither. Instead he is a thoughtful, practical R&D scientist, who just happens to have been building commercially successful robots for more than a decade.

Yes, that’s a thing now. And in a way, it’s even cooler than fiction.

irobot roomba 780 1

Above: The Roomba 780 Vacuum Cleaner

Robotics is an area of tech that like voice control, 3D video and virtual reality, still seems like a futuristic dream – even though it has existed in practical forms for many years. Hollywood still busies itself by inventing robot fairytales for blockbuster movie, but you can actually go to Curry’s today and buy a robot for a couple of hundred quid to do your housework — and then drive it home in a car that was probably built by one.

If you do, there’s a good chance that robot will have been made by iRobot.

For more than a decade iRobot has sold its highly successful Roomba series of robotic vacuum cleaners, to the point where total sales now number more than 8 million units. The newest Roombas have come on a long way in ten years. The latest models are able to clean floors more effectively than ever, as well as being quieter and more intelligent than before. iRobot has also found success building land and sea robots for the military and first responders, which have recently been used in the wreckage of the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan. Its underwater robots were also used in the Gulf of Mexico after the BP oil spill.

Still, Jones admits that there is still a gulf between the robot we all know should exist, and the robots that do – and actually have a reason to.

“It’s just not all that productive if you’re going to sit in the lab and try to build the ultimate robot,” Dr Jones told the Huffington Post UK. “But to take what you’ve got now and understand how you might apply it, in a valuable practical way, while in parallel continuing to develop more advanced capabilities that in future iterations you could roll out, that’s useful.

“Perhaps to satisfy the dreams of what a robot should be in a lot of people’s minds, that’s a complex problem that is going to take time,” he said.

“But I would point out for example that a robot doesn’t have to look like a person to be useful. Solving a problem where you have a robot with two legs that has to balance, and walk around and all that, is difficult. But at the same time people like iRobot have things like the Roomba, which operates on its own and doesn’t look anything like a person but is very practical.

You don’t have to satisfy the ultimate vision of a robot that looks, acts and smells like a person, you need to focus on what is the task you want it to do and what is the most practical solution.”

Which is not to say that robotics in general – or companies like iRobot in particular – are not making progress. There are a number of strange and interesting areas where technology is constantly pushing back the boundaries of robotics and finding new solutions.

For instance, if a robot is to act intelligently in the real world it has to be able to look around it and know what it’s seeing. It used to be thought it was possible to just show a robot a bunch of pictures of various objects, and have it learn to recognise them by blunt force. It turns out that isn’t good enough. In a moving environment, with a standard camera and limited power and processing, a robot has to be able to recognise objects on its own and decide what they are for itself. And like it or not, that isn’t easy.

“Having the robot be able to sense, understand and really respond to a variety of situations beyond what the products can do today,” Jones said.

The best research iRobot has done is getting close to that practical reality, but it’s still a long, long way off from anything like the perceptive ability of a human.

“Right now we have a system on the research side …[that can] recognise about 10 different object classes. For example an object class might be ‘car’, ‘horse’, ‘person’ – and the system is trained to recognise that class. Beforehand you’d train the subject by showing the system a large number of pictures of the object… but there are other additional challenges you have to address.”

var src_url=”http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?playList=517342767&height=411&width=570&sid=577&relatedMode=2&relatedBottomHeight=60&companionPos=&hasCompanion=false&autoStart=false&colorPallet=%23FFEB00&videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&shuffle=0&continuous=true”; src_url += “&onVideoDataLoaded=HPTrack.Vid.DL&onTimeUpdate=HPTrack.Vid.TC”; if (typeof(commercial_video) == “object”) { src_url += “&siteSection=”+commercial_video.site_and_category; if (commercial_video.package) { src_url += “&sponsorship=”+commercial_video.package; } } document.write(”);

Another area being looked at inside iRobot’s labs right now is how to make a robot act in a way that is not just useful, but, well, pleasant

“When you think about it psychologically – how can robots be the most adaptive operating around people, having them act in ways that people find to be natural and accepted. That becomes even more difficult.”

Part of that effort is building robots in different ways. Jones says iRobot is working actively to build robot arms and limbs out of inflatable materials rather than heavy metal, so that in an industrial environment they can work alongside humans more safely. Other companies are looking at this too.

When it comes to iRobot’s work with military and first response robots, it’s surprising to learn that there is actually a lot of crossover between the two arenas.

Did you know, for instance, that the algorithm which tells a robot vacuum cleaner where to check for dust derives from one which swept fields? For mines?

irobot 510 packbot 4

Above: the iRobot 510 PackBot

“That approach directly inspired the coverage software that the Roomba uses to vacuum your floor,” Jones says.

“There’s always fun stuff to do! I’ve been working in robotics R&D for over 15 years and it continues to be interesting. The ultimate vision is a ways out. There is a lot of practical stuff we can do along the way but there is always more to do.”

But what about that ultimate robot he mentioned earlier. Surely Jones has a picture of what that might be?

I ask him and he takes a long, long pause. You can almost seethe shining, brilliant masterpiece in his head before it vanishes in a puff of reality.

“That’s a hard question to answer,” he said. “I’m looking forward to seeing robots and building technologies that are important for the long term. You know, making the robots smarter – that’s something that is a hard problem and we’re going to continue to work on it.”

Kayley Kravitz: Farewell to Facebook

I’ll admit it: when I originally deactivated my Facebook account in fall 2011, I did it to hide. I’d chickened out of graduate school abroad. My first “serious” relationship had come to a spectacular end. Explaining myself to almost everyone I had ever known was a terrifying prospect. In my own small way, I chose to emulate my teenage hero Richey Edwards and simply disappeared.

It’s been almost a year and I can’t say that I miss Facebook one bit. Sure, I lost touch with some acquaintances but that was inevitable when I moved to the other side of the country. I have a new found appreciation for emails and Gchat. Certain friends I converse with almost daily on Gchat; others I hear from every few weeks in the form of a lengthy email or old-fashioned phone call. I’m still in contact with my closest friends. I’ve got Twitter (under a pseudonym) to keep me abreast of interesting things happening in San Francisco.

While it has been debated, studies have shown that Facebook contributes to depression and feelings of extreme loneliness. Even some of my most well adjusted friends have commented on the constant stream of engagement and wedding photos making them question their own life choices. How could it not? Instead of being happy with our own lives and focusing on personal timelines and milestones, we’re constantly bombarded with the news of our friends’ accomplishments. While we can be happy for them, it’s exhausting when we feel like we have to keep up.

Our online identities are carefully crafted. We choose only our most attractive photos to display on our profiles. We write status updates about the exciting things we’re doing, places we’re going and people we’re with. When you’re sitting alone in your room on a Friday night listening to Morrissey, it’s easy to forget that your Facebook news feed is only a tiny fraction of what is happening in your friends’ lives. It’s only what they choose to share. Most people don’t share the bad stuff. I know it’s silly but I fell for the Facebook fiction. I felt like everyone had these fabulous, fulfilling lives while I was on the outside looking in.

Horror stories have been published about employers asking for job applicants’ Facebook passwords. Recently, psychologists discovered that employers frown upon applicants without a Facebook presence. The lack of a profile raises many red flags: is this person anti-social? Was once tagged in too many party photos? Is he or she just pretentious?

It’s clear that the work/life balance we once had is gone. Most employers used to respect an employee’s personal life. Now, it can make or break your chances of being hired. In 2010, I landed my first post-college job. My boss joked that he almost didn’t hire me because my Facebook page was unsearchable. Now I think he may have actually been serious.

With all of the negative press against Facebook (going public, anyone?) I can’t help but wonder if it’s slowly but surely going the way of MySpace. Facebook is no longer just a social media tool; it’s overrun with advertisements and games. I loved Facebook while I was in college. It was a great way to keep in touch with my friends at different universities. It made organizing campus events a breeze. Now that I’m in the real world, Facebook just grates on me. Like Noel Gallagher once sang, “Am I cracking up or just getting older?” I don’t think I’m alone in my feelings as it’s gradually becoming cool to not be on Facebook.

Deactivating Facebook is incredibly freeing. I still have an Internet presence — you can find me on LinkedIn and if you dig hard enough, even Twitter and Tumblr. I’m not trying to pretend like I was a Facebook saint when I had it. It’s embarrassing now but I was the queen of “vaguebooking.” A combination of passive aggression and sad song lyrics, I never wanted to directly address things that made me upset. It’s a typical mindset when you’re 22. Without Facebook I have more time to cultivate close friendships with people, even ones on the other side of the world. While I still maintain an Internet presence, I can focus on my professional appearance rather than my social one.

Kayley Kravitz: Farewell to Facebook

I’ll admit it: when I originally deactivated my Facebook account in fall 2011, I did it to hide. I’d chickened out of graduate school abroad. My first “serious” relationship had come to a spectacular end. Explaining myself to almost everyone I had ever known was a terrifying prospect. In my own small way, I chose to emulate my teenage hero Richey Edwards and simply disappeared.

It’s been almost a year and I can’t say that I miss Facebook one bit. Sure, I lost touch with some acquaintances but that was inevitable when I moved to the other side of the country. I have a new found appreciation for emails and Gchat. Certain friends I converse with almost daily on Gchat; others I hear from every few weeks in the form of a lengthy email or old-fashioned phone call. I’m still in contact with my closest friends. I’ve got Twitter (under a pseudonym) to keep me abreast of interesting things happening in San Francisco.

While it has been debated, studies have shown that Facebook contributes to depression and feelings of extreme loneliness. Even some of my most well adjusted friends have commented on the constant stream of engagement and wedding photos making them question their own life choices. How could it not? Instead of being happy with our own lives and focusing on personal timelines and milestones, we’re constantly bombarded with the news of our friends’ accomplishments. While we can be happy for them, it’s exhausting when we feel like we have to keep up.

Our online identities are carefully crafted. We choose only our most attractive photos to display on our profiles. We write status updates about the exciting things we’re doing, places we’re going and people we’re with. When you’re sitting alone in your room on a Friday night listening to Morrissey, it’s easy to forget that your Facebook news feed is only a tiny fraction of what is happening in your friends’ lives. It’s only what they choose to share. Most people don’t share the bad stuff. I know it’s silly but I fell for the Facebook fiction. I felt like everyone had these fabulous, fulfilling lives while I was on the outside looking in.

Horror stories have been published about employers asking for job applicants’ Facebook passwords. Recently, psychologists discovered that employers frown upon applicants without a Facebook presence. The lack of a profile raises many red flags: is this person anti-social? Was once tagged in too many party photos? Is he or she just pretentious?

It’s clear that the work/life balance we once had is gone. Most employers used to respect an employee’s personal life. Now, it can make or break your chances of being hired. In 2010, I landed my first post-college job. My boss joked that he almost didn’t hire me because my Facebook page was unsearchable. Now I think he may have actually been serious.

With all of the negative press against Facebook (going public, anyone?) I can’t help but wonder if it’s slowly but surely going the way of MySpace. Facebook is no longer just a social media tool; it’s overrun with advertisements and games. I loved Facebook while I was in college. It was a great way to keep in touch with my friends at different universities. It made organizing campus events a breeze. Now that I’m in the real world, Facebook just grates on me. Like Noel Gallagher once sang, “Am I cracking up or just getting older?” I don’t think I’m alone in my feelings as it’s gradually becoming cool to not be on Facebook.

Deactivating Facebook is incredibly freeing. I still have an Internet presence — you can find me on LinkedIn and if you dig hard enough, even Twitter and Tumblr. I’m not trying to pretend like I was a Facebook saint when I had it. It’s embarrassing now but I was the queen of “vaguebooking.” A combination of passive aggression and sad song lyrics, I never wanted to directly address things that made me upset. It’s a typical mindset when you’re 22. Without Facebook I have more time to cultivate close friendships with people, even ones on the other side of the world. While I still maintain an Internet presence, I can focus on my professional appearance rather than my social one.

Did Abe Lincoln Use Emoticons?

Was Abraham Lincoln one of the first people to use the playful ;) emoticon?

Though the text symbol for “winking,” used in our emails, tweets, texts and instant messages, was officially introduced in 1982, the ;) appears in a copy of a speech President Lincoln delivered way back in 1862.

The New York Times wrote in 2009 that a newspaper specialist working for archival company Proquest had spotted a sideways “face” in one of Lincoln’s speech transcripts, printed in the Times on August 7, 1862. The symbol appeared after the word “laughter.”

The sentence in question reads thus:

“… but it is also true that there is no precedent for your being here yourselves, (applause and laughter ;) and I offer, in justification of myself and you, that I have found nothing in the Constitution against.”

(Visit the New York Times site to see a scanned copy of the speech containing the apparent emoticon.)

How is this possible? According to the Times, the “winky face” may have been the work of a typesetter, who would have been responsible for arranging the semicolon and single parenthesis bracket before the transcribed speech was printed. Experts found themselves split: Some suggested the semicolon could be attributed to grammar that was characteristic of the 1800s; others argued the use of a Linotype machine meant each key would have to be assembled, making it difficult to accidentally add extra characters and spaces.

Whether or not this ;) was meant to appear in Lincoln’s speech, it is generally accepted that the birthday of emoticons is September 19th, 1982. In a email sent at 11:44 a.m. on that date, Carnegie Mellon University Professor Scott Fahlman explained to his students how he wanted them to use the symbols to distinguish between sarcasm and serious comments in digital communications, according to The Independent.

“I propose the following character sequence for joke markers: :-) Read it sideways,” he wrote.

An excerpt from Fahlman’s 1982 email is below, taken from the Carnegie Mellon Computer Science Department page:

emoticon 30 birthday linclon

Professor Fahlman also spoke with the New York Times about his thoughts on Honest Abe’s possible emoticon. One explanation he came up with was that the typesetter was “having his own little joke.”

Fahlman has admitted he’s no fan of the new-fangled Emoji, or animated versions of emoticons. “I think they are ugly, and they ruin the challenge of trying to come up with a clever way to express emotions using standard keyboard characters,” he said in a recent interview. “But perhaps that’s just because I invented the other kind.”

Do you think an emoticon was purposely inserted into President Lincoln’s speech after the word “laughter”? Do you use Fahlman’s modern emoticons in digital conversation? Sound off in the comments section of tweet us [@HuffPostTech]. Then read up on what other languages call the @ symbol, or check out Skype’s integration of the emoticon’s more humanistic counterpart, the Humoticon.

Motorola RAZR HD announced for Germany, launches in October

Motorola RAZR HD announced for Germany, launches in October

A few days ago, Motorola announced that its latest RAZR HD smartphone will launch in Germany sometime in October.  For German citizens, this is significant because another great Android smartphone is headed your way.  For American consumers, this is potentially significant because the DROID RAZR HD and DROID RAZR MAXX HD could launch in October as well.  It would be surprising to see Motorola’s flagship device launch in Germany before America, especially considering it was announced here first.

At the very least, the DROID RAZR HD/DROID RAZR MAXX HD should launch in Germany and the United States at the same time, which would be October.  During the American unveiling, Motorola reaffirmed it would launch before the Holidays, so October sounds like a solid target date.

As always, we will have to wait until official confirmation from Motorola or Verizon, but hopefully October will see the launch of the DROID RAZR HD and RAZR MAXX HD.

[Motorola] [Droid-Life]

Krugman: Believe In The iPhone Stimulus? Then Believe In Government Spending

Are you, or is someone you know, a gadget freak? If so, you doubtless know that Wednesday was iPhone 5 day, the day Apple unveiled its latest way for people to avoid actually speaking to or even looking at whoever they’re with.

The Worst Out-Of-Office Message Ever?

The important thing to remember about out-of-office replies is that no one is ever happy to receive them. An out-of-office reply is your way of saying, to anyone who emails with a request, “You’re out of luck, motherfucker – I’M GONE.” Use them to list the dates you’ll be gone and the name of an alternate contact person. Do not use them to trick people into reading all about your exciting life.

R.I.P. Apple’s Headphones, 2001-2012

At its event in San Francisco on Wednesday, Apple introduced “earpods,” a set of newly-designed headphones that will replace its iconic “earbuds” of old, which will come bundled with all Apple mobile devices from now on. Because this represents the end of The White Earbud Era, I thought I’d say a few words, to mourn the passing of Apple’s stalwart headphones.

What will I miss about Apple’s earbuds? It would be easy to answer “Absolutely nothing are you kidding me?”: The sound quality was bad; they wouldn’t stay put in my ears; they were more prone to tangles than a box of Christmas tree lights; it took almost no force at all to bust them open and render them inoperable. But on reflecting upon this, the day the iconic white headphones will disappear forever, I did come up with a few things I will miss. For example:

- I’ll miss the extra exercise I would get when I made the mistake of trying to go running with my Apple earbuds. Because they were so poorly shaped, the buds would constantly fall out of my ears, so that every three steps I would have to lift up one of my arms to shove the dangling bud back into my auditory canal, making it stick for at least another five seconds, until it would inevitably fall out again. This doubtless built up much-needed muscle mass in my biceps.

- I’ll miss being able to listen hip-hop and jazz without hearing any bass whatsoever.

- I’ll miss having to wait to listen to music for ten minutes while I painstakingly attempted to untangle the incredible knot my headphones had managed to get themselves into while sitting at the bottom of my bag, a tangle so incredible it was as though little gremlins in my backpack had deviously tied everything together while I wasn’t looking.

- I’ll miss the way that accidentally falling asleep with an earbud in my ear inevitably meant an earache so painful that even a light breeze the next day would send a shock of agony throughout my entire body.

- I’ll miss the way that the rigid earbuds would stretch the entrance to my ear canal, perhaps permanently distending the very architecture of my ear.

- I’ll miss the way that, whenever anyone said “earbud,” it would immediately remind me of “Air Bud,” a movie from my childhood about a dog who was really good at basketball. I loved that movie, and I love dogs, too. Just think about a golden retriever dribbling a basketball, and you’ll smile, too. Dogs can’t play basketball!

Apple’s upgrade to these new “earpods” is, in other words, fantastic for the ears of iPhone and iPod owners everywhere, and quite possibly the most exciting announcement I heard come from San Francisco. At its heart, the iPhone 5 represents an incremental upgrade that should have been made last year, with a much-needed boost in display size, the addition of the more current 4G LTE connectivity, and what appears to be a meaningful speed increase in the processor. The iPods Touch and Nano that Apple introduced are enticing, but the dedicated MP3 player feels like an afterthought in 2012, a dying breed of gadget that may not be around much longer. The changes to iTunes, meanwhile, make it a real competitor with WinAmp to top my list of Best Desktop Music Apps of 2003. (Here’s hoping that, at the very least, iTunes 11 loads faster than iTunes 1-10).

The earpods, though: The earpods are genuinely exciting. There aren’t very many phone manufacturers that include headphones with their phones anymore: It’s a bygone perk. Samsung does, though its buds are as equally low-quality as Apple’s old ones; HTC phones were shipping with Beats headphones for awhile, but that is apparently out of the plan. It’s a small advantage, almost immeasurable, but given the early positive reviews its earpods are receiving, it’s a nice one to have. Apple now appears to be the only company sending out quality headphones with its phone; given that most people use their smartphones as a dual phone/MP3 player, count this as a tiny but meaningful upgrade to the iPhone package, and really good news for the tender, tender ears of Americans everywhere (not to mention the audio quality of the music that is pumped into them).

Adam Kirk Edgerton: Thirty Minutes With Eric Simons

When I asked Eric Simons why he took a one-way flight to Palo Alto instead of going to college, he said, “I wasn’t mature enough to learn for the sake of learning.” And I thought, who ever is?

As teachers, we are tasked to engage, to excite, and to inspire our students. Because often what we have to teach them, as dictated by the standards movement, is not that interesting. I used to love Oedipus Rex, but if I had to drag one more senior through it, I would have gouged my own eyes out.

Most of us aren’t confident enough to bail out of an undergraduate education, especially when we are told that college is The Way. And that’s what I tell my students now – that College, with a capital C, is the only way out of poverty. But it was clear to me that Simons made the right decision when faced with a system that discourages creativity, entrepreneurship and iconoclastic intellect.

Full disclosure: as an East-Coast English teacher, my view of Silicon Valley start-ups has been completely mythologized by Steve Jobs: A Biography and The Social Network. And Simons fits this mold perfectly – young, charismatic, geekily attractive, risk-taking, endearing and hyper-articulate. He spoke about his fledgling company, ClassConnect, and its soon-to-be-released app, Claco, with the same conviction that I heard my Sunday preachers speak about the promise of Heaven, and the certainty of Hell. I took his enthusiasm with a dose of skepticism, but it required a serious, concentrated effort.

Much has been written about Simons’ days squatting in the offices of AOL once his initial investment ran out, so I won’t bother to rehash it. It’s a gimmicky origin story that works well for him, but it’s not what I found most interesting. It’s that instead of an XBox for his thirteenth birthday, Simons asked for six books on programming. When Simons was frustrated by his high school classes, he worked to develop a website that allowed his class to communicate and study in a way that encouraged ownership of their learning. Instead of turning away from the problems in education, Simons turned his talents on them, and now hopes to make the lives of teachers infinitely easier. I hope that he’s able to actually do this for the sake of the profession.

When I open up the Claco beta (which you can apply for), it takes about two clicks for me to open a middle-school social studies binder for an animated video of George Washington. “A lot of pictures of me make me look kind of serious and grumpy,” George bemoans. A few more clicks take me to a detailed second-grade lesson plan on the brainstorming process, perfectly aligned with the new (and much-maligned) Common Core standards. It’s all just starting out, but it shows promise, and it made me realize a part of my educational life didn’t really have to be so hard, or so expensive.

Just as Jobs looked at the MP3 player and realized the pre-iPods were “shit,” Simons has seen the archaic way educators share relevant resources. There are websites, most of them terribly designed, for lesson plans. Some charge exorbitant fees for study questions and crossword puzzles. But there’s nothing right now that educators, in those last-minute panics or late-night, first-year-freakouts, can turn to as a reliable, dependable, free source for teaching material and content. Claco isn’t all of these things yet, but it could be.

Here is the problem that I faced as a first-, and even as a third-year teacher. Let’s say I have to teach literary criticism for Life of Pi. How do I start? Well, first, I Google it. I sift through links and lists of discussion questions. I read the SparkNotes and make assessments around them. And that’s really about the extent of what’s available to me. Then I come up with some ideas of my own, save them to my school network drive, and maybe share them with another colleague. Maybe, if they ask.

So imagine this instead. You’re trying to teach about the Chicago teacher strike, and you can click on a binder where you can “snap” other teachers’ lesson plans into it, then Skype with someone on the front lines. It takes moments, and the interface is uncluttered and clean (think the opposite of what Facebook is now). Not only do we need this, but we need it all in one place, because we don’t have time to go Googling for it.

So although I’m not sure how successful Simons will ultimately be, I wish him and his team the best of luck. Educators need a place where we can share easily and effortlessly, and Simons has a shot at a long-term solution.

Jamie Holmes: The Future of Nostalgia

The delicious new documentary Side by Side is partly a character study in nostalgic and pragmatic temperaments. Written and directed by Chris Kenneally, with Keanu Reeves interviewing the Hollywood talent, the documentary explores the likely end of moviemaking with photochemical film and the ongoing transition to digital. Last year marked an unmistakable milestone, it turns out, as camera makers Aaton, ARRI, and Panavision each stopped production of film cameras.

There’s Christopher Nolan, comparing digital manipulation to a “horrible chemical” that produces “hollow” effects. There are George Lucas and James Cameron, completely cold-blooded–a tool is a tool, after all. There’s Robert Rodriguez, in his cowboy hat, and Martin Scorsese, charming and funny and insightful.

Celluloid is praised for its character, or as Dick Pope, who worked on the The Illusionist, puts it, its “grit and grain and texture.” Film is consistently described as more emotional, and even, by the cinematographer Reed Morano, as a “comforting thing” to hold dear to. “Grains of film,” says David Tattersall, of Star Wars Episodes 1-3, are “just constantly moving…the result is a kind of fuzziness.” Digital, by contrast, is precise. It’s praised for its “immediacy.” Producer Jason Kliot, of Coffee and Cigarettes, remarks that video “occupies a space in your mind” where you think “I’m in that room with them, oh my god is this really happening.” Digital, at least traditionally, isn’t sentimental.

This tension between grainy romance and discomforting immediacy helps drive the documentary’s momentum. It also suggests, in the broader context, a subtle question: could the digital revolution actually change the way we think of nostalgia? If nostalgia is triggered by comforting “fuzziness” and “texture,” then could the digital age alter the way future generations remember the past?

With digital you see the product immediately. We’ve lost the magic of opening that pack of photographs after they’ve been developed, just as cinematographers are losing the magic of viewing “dailies”–or yesterday’s efforts–on the day after shooting. (“They are no longer dailies,” Reeves tells us, “they are immediatelies.”) With digital, the “preciousness” of film is lost. In cinema, you don’t hear the sound of “money running through the camera,” as Morano says. With photography, you don’t have that 24-picture limit anymore. Snap away. And the images don’t degrade, either.

Several days ago I stumbled across two old photos of my father on his dresser. The first was black and white. He’s four or five, it’s the 1950s. His little mouth is open and his eyes are wide in uncertain anticipation of the photo. He’s in a cowboy outfit, with hat, ascot, boots, and holsters, pointing two toy guns at the camera with less than stellar accuracy. The white borders are nearly as wide as the image itself, and the edges are decoratively scalloped. In the other photo, he’s in his early twenties. It’s a Polaroid. His arm is wrapped around my grandmother on a couch. A green hue has dulled all colors. Part of the emotion I get from looking at the photos lies in how they’ve faded, themselves like memories or dreams. They are more symbolic than literal, suggesting long-gone technologies, the multiple “versions” of him that have existed throughout the years, and the relentless march of time. They do not suggest immediacy. Wouldn’t my experience be different if photos never faded, if instead I felt like I was in the room with him?

Nostalgia, or the sentimental longing for the past, is a fascinating emotion, often involving, as the psychologists Xinyue Zhou, Constantine Sedikides, Tim Wildschut, and Ding-Guo Gao wrote in a 2008 study, “the simultaneous expression of happiness and sadness.” By reminding subjects of nostalgic events in their past, they found, people felt more socially supported. Nostalgia, they wrote, is a “psychological resource that protects and fosters mental health.” It counteracts loneliness by making us feel more connected. It’s intensely associated with family and friends, special events, and beautiful scenery. Apparently, according to a 2006 study led by Tim Wildschut, we experience feelings of nostalgia roughly three times a week. Nostalgia softens us. It’s humbling and healthy. Vast oceans and sunsets remind us of how small we all are in space, it seems, as nostalgia reminds us how small we all are in time.

The fuzziness of film, the pictures that fade, the preciousness of printed photos, the obsolete technology–these are all “nostalgia triggers.” What happens when the digital revolution removes some of them? What happens when instead of reminiscing over the distant bittersweet past, all of the past looks basically the same? What happens when it all looks too immediate, too intimate for comfort?

One solution is to recreate the nostalgic triggers digitally.

The overnight success of Instagram, sold to Facebook in a billion dollar deal earlier this year, is a testament to the current longing for nostalgia in the digital age. It’s true product, Ian Crouch recently blogged at the New Yorker, is instant nostalgia. The icon is an old camera, the “gram” echoes telegram, and the filters offer a range of effects that make digital photos look like those in old family photo albums. One of Instrgram’s founders, Mike Krieger, majored in an interdisciplinary program that included coding and psychology. Krieger’s old professor, the New York Times reported in April, described Instagram as “not a technology triumph” but rather a “design and psychology triumph.” Instagram mimics the psychological distance of old photos, or memories themselves, and acts in essence as an instant nostalgia trigger.

The same thing is possible in cinema, certainly. O Brother, Where Art Thou was shot in digital, and employed color manipulation throughout–applying, to make a crude comparison, the equivalent of Instagram’s “Nashville” filter on all of the trees, making them less green and more Mississippi mud while keeping the blues blue.

Professional photography and cinema, to be clear, always manipulated reality for emotional effect, and cinema and photography do far more than provoke nostalgia. The immediacy of digital was perfect, for instance, for Michael Mann’s film Collateral. And of course digital filmmaking is opening up wild new possibilities, as Avatar made obvious. What’s changed in the last several years is that not only are digital cameras capturing more pixels, but they’re also getting better at capturing a wider dynamic range between blacks and whites–at allowing cinematographers to mimic the effects of underexposing or overexposing footage that celluloid allows.

As the actor Greta Gerwig puts it in Side by Side, “They’ve processed digital now to make it look like film, as if film is inherently better.”

The question of what effects the digital revolution will have on memory and nostalgia isn’t merely personal. It’s historical. It will let children in 2150 see long-dead ancestors’ wedding days in perfect HD. It will bring other cultures and countries into our living rooms with discomforting clarity, and seems certain to have the same effect across time. Technology will improve, yes, and nostalgia will adapt to other triggers besides worn photos and grainy films. But there can be no doubt that we’ve reached a tipping point. Unless we choose it to be, the past will never be fuzzy or faded again.

New Documents Reveal How Apple Really Invented The iPhone

Like many of Apple’s inventions, the iPhone began not with a vision, but with a problem. By 2005, the iPod had eclipsed the Mac as Apple’s largest source of revenue, but the music player that rescued Apple from the brink now faced a looming threat: The cellphone. Everyone carried a phone, and if phone companies figured out a way to make playing music easy and fun, “that could render the iPod unnecessary,” Steve Jobs once warned Apple’s board, according to Walter Isaacson’s biography.

Fortunately for Apple, most phones on the market sucked.

Linda Miller: The Headache of ‘Social’ Technology

Here’s my idea of great technology: anything that makes life easier. Give me the product, the platform, the software, or the app that removes a layer of complexity from my daily routine, and I am a fan for life.

I can’t imagine this is news. Think of the relief people must have felt when they realized they’d no longer have to get up in the pre-dawn cold to stoke the fire for breakfast or head down to spend the entire day by the river to beat underclothes clean on a rock. What a luxury all that newfound leisure time must have seemed! More time for family, friends, and the people, hobbies and life you really care about.

But over the last few decades, technology has worked its way from our functional/working lives, and has moved rather aggressively into our social lives. And if the measuring criterion is “anything that makes life easier,” this technology has failed miserably. When it comes to online communication and social technology, I feel like Lucy working at the chocolate factory, scrambling to keep up with an ever-faster conveyor belt, desperate to hold everything together but doomed to failure.

I’m up at dawn answering emails from multiple accounts and feel the pull of Facebook to keep up with friends and family and to let them know I’m paying attention and I care. My Twitter and RSS feeds are full of things I should be reading, following, and responding to. I can’t keep track of who sent me what, where, and when, or who needs to be contacted when, where, and how. Add to that the fact that every day there’s a new technology — one that I’m supposed to know about, check out, learn about. From where I stand, these aren’t “solutions,” just more problems. It’s maddening, and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone.

Instead of introducing more social technology, I’d like to make a simple proposition: How about instead of more, bigger, newer as the goals, we just aim for better?

Here’s what I think real solutions should take on:

Email Overload. Enough. The multiple accounts are a headache. How did I arrive at this insane place with two work accounts, and three social (including the old Yahoo! address that I haven’t had the heart to retire)? But the real mess is all the messages. Hours of my day go to sorting, filtering, trashing and only then getting to actually responding. Then I go and complicate things even further by doing something like accidentally emailing a colleague from my personal account (say goodbye to that hour you spend looking for that email you know you sent but just can’t find any record of, until you finally realize your own human frailty is to blame. Yeah, Lucy, I feel you…). Rare is the day when I’m not barely holding it all together.

Too Many Platforms With Disconnected Purposes. Yes, there’s always an app for that, but then there’s a desktop application for that other thing, and social media channel for that one, and… Why does every relationship and way of interacting have to require a completely new solution to do it? Why can’t I just communicate with people how I want, in one place?

No Way to Get at Priority Information. “Define priority,” you say, right? For work? For family? For my soccer tournament? The very important vacation my friends and I are planning for six months from now? What’s most important to me at any given moment is top of my mind right then, and I would love to just be able to get at that. Give me the most important, most recent, most relevant conversation or information without making me sift, sort, or dig.

The Struggle to Keep Track of People. You’d think with all the different platforms and ways of communicating, we’d all know exactly how to get in touch with each other at any time, right? Right. I’d say that at least once a day I search emails, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter to try to find someone’s contact info, and even then, I’ve been known to come up empty-handed. I can find myself wondering what technology is even for when I try to put together my annual Christmas card mailing list. It makes me nostalgic for the phone book. And that’s saying something.

In a nutshell, I don’t want to be busier. I know there are people who take some sort of perverse pleasure in saying, I’m so busy. I’m not one of them. I want technology that gives me back my leisure time. The idea is to spend less time with my phone, my computer, my tablet, so that I can sit down to dinner with my family, hear about my kids’ day at school, ditch work early for drinks with my girlfriends, take a two-week vacation… you get the idea. But rest assured, I’m making my leisure wish list, and you should be too. The next wave of great technology is going to give us back our time. Facetime!

Gay Bar ‘Flash Mob’ App Hits iOS Store

A new app to help groups of gay people ‘create’ gay bars at any time has hit the iOS App Store.

The Welcoming Committee app is intended to help create gatherings of gay people on the fly, and allow them to “experience all bars, events, and major travel destinations the same way straight people do”.

It works by allowing users to select a local bar at any time, create an event, and then try and get your event enough votes to turn it into a genuine gathering.

The most popular events hit the top of the list, providing other users with a list of what’s happening in a local area. The result is that instead of a few pre-arranged gay bars, gatherings of like-minded people can occur spontaneously, anywhere in a city.

The app’s makers explain:

Simply boot up the app to see which venues in your area are trending gay right now. TWC is entirely anonymous. It’s about making nightlife spaces a little bit gayer.

It’s a neat idea, and it’s available in the UK now.